salut

2006-03-20 Thread anonymous
[EMAIL PROTECTED] voici le site des carte virtuelle dont je t\'ai parlé: http://www.allopass.com/check/red.php4?CA=X212863LRBR56A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#357927: ITP: freepbx -- web based management tool for asterisk, replacement for amp

2006-03-20 Thread Stephen Birch
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Stephen Birch [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: freepbx Version : 2.0.1 Upstream Author : jason_d_becker, rcourtna, tcourtna, etc * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/amportal/ * License : GPS Description : web

Re: The problem with killfiles, and other musings [Was: Re: removal of svenl from the project]

2006-03-20 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 12:28:14PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: I was going to make a large answer where i was going to denouse the inexactitudes and false claims of this clearly inflamatory mail, but i will refrain from doing so. I wonder if Steve, and others of the 'esteemed' DDs, is

one binary package created by different source packages, will the old source package disappear?

2006-03-20 Thread Frank Küster
Hi, assume the following scenario: - Source package foo creates binary packages libfoo1 and libfoo-dev - source package foo2 creates binary packages libfoo2 and libfoo2-dev Since both versions are API-compatible, libfoo2-dev is renamed to foo-dev, replacing the old binary package from source

Re: one binary package created by different source packages, will the old source package disappear?

2006-03-20 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 12:03:13PM +0100, Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, assume the following scenario: - Source package foo creates binary packages libfoo1 and libfoo-dev - source package foo2 creates binary packages libfoo2 and libfoo2-dev Since both versions are

library for imap (client)

2006-03-20 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello *, Currently I am starting a new project and want to know, if someone know the existence if an imapclient library for C programing? I do not realy want to reinvent the wheel. Or should I steal the routines from other IMAP clients? Greetings Michelle Konzack -- Linux-User #280138

Re: library for imap (client)

2006-03-20 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 03:49:07PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote: Currently I am starting a new project and want to know, if someone know the existence if an imapclient library for C programing? libc-client with some limitations... -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: library for imap (client)

2006-03-20 Thread Steve Greenland
On 18-Mar-06, 08:49 (CST), Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Currently I am starting a new project and want to know, if someone know the existence if an imapclient library for C programing? Michelle, please meet http://www.google.com. Google, meet Michelle. Steve -- Steve Greenland

Re: one binary package created by different source packages, will the old source package disappear?

2006-03-20 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Source package foo creates binary packages libfoo1 and libfoo-dev - source package foo2 creates binary packages libfoo2 and libfoo2-dev Since both versions are API-compatible, libfoo2-dev is renamed to foo-dev, replacing the old binary package from

Re: one binary package created by different source packages, will the old source package disappear?

2006-03-20 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 12:03:13PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: Hi, assume the following scenario: - Source package foo creates binary packages libfoo1 and libfoo-dev - source package foo2 creates binary packages libfoo2 and libfoo2-dev Since both versions are API-compatible, libfoo2-dev

Re: library for imap (client)

2006-03-20 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Michelle! You wrote: Currently I am starting a new project and want to know, if someone know the existence if an imapclient library for C programing? I do not realy want to reinvent the wheel. I've used libetpan[1] in the past for some small projects. It's rather nice, as it has a single

Re: one binary package created by different source packages, will the old source package disappear?

2006-03-20 Thread Frank Küster
Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: N.B.: Such questions are easier to answer (less guessing needed w.r.t. missing information) given a real example. I've noticed that. I thought it was a simple question regarding the infrastructure setup, but it turns out not to be... foo in

shared libraries dependecy problem.

2006-03-20 Thread Grzegorz Bizon
Hi. I have problem with dependecies on shared libraries in my package (tleenx2). Linda complains that: W: tleenx2; A binary links against a library that is not depended on. (By the way - shoudn't it be error rather than warning ?) I have checked binary with objdump and ldd and i got ... simillar

Bug last active indicator?

2006-03-20 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
I am wondering if it would be possible to modify the code for bugs.debian.org to show one additional bit of information. The last item of information shown for a bug summary on a b.d.o page is the age of the bug (that is, how long it has been since the bug was first opened). Would it be possible

Re: dicussion about patches ... ignoring patches make motivation to provide them fall

2006-03-20 Thread Thomas Hood
Russ Allbery wrote: Whenever this topic comes up on debian-devel, the conversation seems to focus on the small minority of maintainers who don't respond to bugs, are still active on their packages, resist any attempt at co-maintainership, and can't be dealt with through the MIA process. Yes,

Re: library for imap (client)

2006-03-20 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2006-03-20 14:33:30, schrieb Bas Zoetekouw: Hi Michelle! I've used libetpan[1] in the past for some small projects. It's rather nice, as it has a single abstract interface to pop, imap, maildir, mbox, etc. I don't know how well it scales to large mail collections, though. [1]

Re: library for imap (client)

2006-03-20 Thread Ricardo Mones
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 14:33:30 +0100 Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Michelle! You wrote: Currently I am starting a new project and want to know, if someone know the existence if an imapclient library for C programing? I do not realy want to reinvent the wheel. I've used

Re: dicussion about patches ... ignoring patches make motivation to provide them fall

2006-03-20 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 20 March 2006 16:04, Thomas Hood wrote: It might not be so simple. Suppose I have taken it upon myself to push change Foo through Debian. The Foo project requires cooperation from several DDs and at the beginning I can't tell whether I will get that cooperation from all of them.

Bug#358003: ITP: ttf-dzongkha -- TrueType fonts for Dzongkha language

2006-03-20 Thread Christian Perrier
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: ttf-dzongkha Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : Chris Fynn [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=115503 * License : GPL

Bug#358009: ITP: rcov -- a code coverage tool for Ruby

2006-03-20 Thread Ari Pollak
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Ari Pollak [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: rcov Version : 0.2.0 Upstream Author : Mauricio Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://eigenclass.org/hiki.rb?rcov * License : Dual GPL/Ruby license, includes a modified

Re: Bug#349693: ITP: gst-fluendo-mp3 -- MP3 decoder plugin for GStreamer

2006-03-20 Thread Florian Weimer
* Josselin Mouette: There is no difference between decoders and encoders. Both require patent licenses. But as I understand it, only the encoding patents are enforceable. I've never seen a compelling argument why this should be the case. The arguments looked more or less like wishful

Re: Bug#349693: ITP: gst-fluendo-mp3 -- MP3 decoder plugin for GStreamer

2006-03-20 Thread Florian Weimer
* Russell Coker: This factor makes it significantly different from the other programs which are afflicted with patent claims. If Thomson has made clear statements about a common use case of software based on their patents in Debian then it's quite different to a battle between Adobe and

Re: First AMD64 Binary Uploaded

2006-03-20 Thread Florian Weimer
* Goswin von Brederlow: Anything that runs from current amd64.debian.net or its mirrors. Both debian-amd64 and debian-pure64? Great, thanks. They are just aliases for the same thing since always. Oh, this wasn't clear from the FAQ. Fortunately, all this is now OBE. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Question about cdrecord developement

2006-03-20 Thread chinlu chinawa
Hi, I've been trying to retrieve from a cdrom as much vendor's info as possible. Thanks of cdrecord source code I can retrieve some of it. However, and although I've been looking where to ask (including any related mailing list within the debian project), haven't seen it. I just wanted to ask

Re: DPL Debate prepared questions list [Debian Policy Sucks]

2006-03-20 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Tuesday 21 March 2006 00:08, Adrian von Bidder wrote: On Saturday 18 March 2006 17:32, Roland Mas wrote: Thaddeus H. Black, 2006-03-18 16:00:11 +0100 : It appears that to have a Enterprise Grade Debian Distribution, we need a SPOC [ed.: Single Point of Contact?] team which can address

Re: Bug#358003: ITP: ttf-dzongkha -- TrueType fonts for Dzongkha language

2006-03-20 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] This package includes fonts that are suitable for the display of the Dzongkha language. May I suggest for rare languages like this that you also mention in the description where the language comes from?

Re: shared libraries dependecy problem.

2006-03-20 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 03:59:04PM +0100, Grzegorz Bizon wrote: I have problem with dependecies on shared libraries in my package (tleenx2). Linda complains that: W: tleenx2; A binary links against a library that is not depended on. (By the way - shoudn't it be error rather than warning ?)

Re: DPL Debate prepared questions list [Debian Policy Sucks]

2006-03-20 Thread Joey Hess
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: So what do you people suggest in such cases: 1) Intel 1000MT NIC sucks, throw it away ? 2) Unh! Why don't you change to Debian Unstable ? 3) Buddy! We are all volunteers. Go and roll your own kernel with the patches ? 4) Wait! That hardware isn't officially

Re: question on hurd-i386 Debian architecture

2006-03-20 Thread Daniel Ruoso
Em Sáb, 2006-03-18 às 23:17 +0100, Pjotr Kourzanov escreveu: Yes. However, I think that 'setting up buildd' is the least difficult of those tasks. It is by far more difficult to produce patches for all 'standard debian packages' that make them first of all, cross-compile correctly, and (only)

Re: dicussion about patches ... ignoring patches make motivation toprovide them fall

2006-03-20 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: So yes, I believe we need to work on the long-term ignored bugs. :) Those are essentially all I work on. It's a good thing I have a thick skin. Some maintainers are genuinely grateful for the assistance, and they're a pleasure to work with. (This includes the X

automatically install -dev packages

2006-03-20 Thread David Griffith
Is there a setting somewhere I can set to cause apt-get and aptitude to always install corresponding -dev packages? The default behavior of not installing them is particularly annoying when dealing with libraries that are installed when the OS itself is installed. -- David Griffith [EMAIL

Re: cross-compiling Debian packages

2006-03-20 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
I hope that my patches (#357629, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] #357658 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED], #357661 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) are proper enough:-) This is incomplete: not only libgcc does not provide -dcv1, but libstdc++ and -dev and -dbg. Would you be so kind to post undeted patches to these

e1000 support in Debian [Was: Re: DPL Debate prepared questions list [Debian Policy Sucks]]

2006-03-20 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 03:39:45PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: So what do you people suggest in such cases: 1) Intel 1000MT NIC sucks, throw it away ? 2) Unh! Why don't you change to Debian Unstable ? 3) Buddy! We are all volunteers. Go and roll your own kernel with

Re: DPL Debate prepared questions list [Debian Policy Sucks]

2006-03-20 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Tuesday 21 March 2006 02:09, Joey Hess wrote: Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: So what do you people suggest in such cases: 1) Intel 1000MT NIC sucks, throw it away ? 2) Unh! Why don't you change to Debian Unstable ? 3) Buddy! We are all volunteers. Go and roll your own kernel with the

Re: DPL Debate prepared questions list [Debian Policy Sucks]

2006-03-20 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Mar 20, Ritesh Raj Sarraf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So what do you people suggest in such cases: If you need a distribution which supports modern hardware, then you should switch to Ubuntu. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: shared libraries dependecy problem.

2006-03-20 Thread Benjamin Seidenberg
Grzegorz Bizon wrote: Hi. I have problem with dependecies on shared libraries in my package (tleenx2). Linda complains that: W: tleenx2; A binary links against a library that is not depended on. (By the way - shoudn't it be error rather than warning ?) Linda seems to be doing this with

Re: DPL Debate prepared questions list [Debian Policy Sucks]

2006-03-20 Thread Don Armstrong
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: On Tuesday 21 March 2006 02:09, Joey Hess wrote: 5) etch beta 2 was released last week with support for your hardware But there might have been many Debian Users who might have discovered this issue earlier. What choice are they given ? They

Re: question on hurd-i386 Debian architecture

2006-03-20 Thread peter.kourzanov
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 05:41:26PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote: Em S?b, 2006-03-18 ?s 23:17 +0100, Pjotr Kourzanov escreveu: Yes. However, I think that 'setting up buildd' is the least difficult of those tasks. It is by far more difficult to produce patches for all 'standard debian packages'

Release Date Update

2006-03-20 Thread Mark Shuttleworh
Guys, you know putting the first freeze date before the end of the summer is foolish. Many people do their best coding during the summer. Debian should make sure The freeze begins after a whole summer of good coding and adding new features, like at the end of August or the begginnig of

Re: Release Date Update

2006-03-20 Thread Michael Banck
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 02:51:25PM -0800, Mark Shuttleworh wrote: [...] Before anybody gets to reply to the body, this is a fake. Mark Shuttleworth doesn't use a hotmail adress to send mail to lists. YHBT, HAND, Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Re: DPL Debate prepared questions list [Debian Policy Sucks]

2006-03-20 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Ritesh Raj Sarraf [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060320 22:14]: RHEL and SLES do a damn good job of Hardware Bug Fixing and Feature Enhancement for the software they ship. Why can't we do it ? Is it just because our policy doesn't allow it ? Can't we revise the policy ? Of course policies can be

Re: Release Date Update

2006-03-20 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 02:51:25PM -0800, Mark Shuttleworh wrote: (In case it wasn't clear, this wasn't Mark Shuttlewor*t*h posting. Please don't feed the troll.) -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Re: DPL Debate prepared questions list [Debian Policy Sucks]

2006-03-20 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 02:43:38 +0530, Ritesh wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tuesday 21 March 2006 02:09, Joey Hess wrote: Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: So what do you people suggest in such cases: 1) Intel 1000MT NIC sucks, throw it away ? 2) Unh! Why don't you change to Debian

Re: Release Date Update

2006-03-20 Thread Joey Hess
someone claiming to be Mark Shuttleworh wrote: Guys, you know putting the first freeze date before the end of the summer is foolish. Many people do their best coding during the summer. Nice troll, but you need to work on your headers. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital

I like the new Release

2006-03-20 Thread Greg Conner
It make be fake but is it a bad idea? A release every year and afterr a good summer of work? Does anybody have a better idea? _ On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice on how to get there!

Re: Release Date Update

2006-03-20 Thread Ron Johnson
On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 23:15 +, Colin Watson wrote: On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 02:51:25PM -0800, Mark Shuttleworh wrote: (In case it wasn't clear, this wasn't Mark Shuttlewor*t*h posting. Please don't feed the troll.) Even so, are his points valid? --

Re: Release Date Update

2006-03-20 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 05:39:23PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 23:15 +, Colin Watson wrote: On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 02:51:25PM -0800, Mark Shuttleworh wrote: (In case it wasn't clear, this wasn't Mark Shuttlewor*t*h posting. Please don't feed the troll.) Even

Re: automatically install -dev packages

2006-03-20 Thread Steve Greenland
On 20-Mar-06, 14:37 (CST), David Griffith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a setting somewhere I can set to cause apt-get and aptitude to always install corresponding -dev packages? The default behavior of not installing them is particularly annoying when dealing with libraries that are

Re: I like the new Release

2006-03-20 Thread Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker
Greg Conner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It make be fake but is it a bad idea? A release every year and afterr a good summer of work? Does anybody have a better idea? FWIW: According to the headers, this mail is sent from the same machine as the original fake. -- ilmari -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: e1000 support in Debian [Was: Re: DPL Debate prepared questions list [Debian Policy Sucks]]

2006-03-20 Thread Olaf van der Spek
On 3/20/06, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 03:39:45PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: So what do you people suggest in such cases: 1) Intel 1000MT NIC sucks, throw it away ? 2) Unh! Why don't you change to Debian Unstable ? 3) Buddy!

Re: I like the new Release

2006-03-20 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote: Greg Conner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It make be fake but is it a bad idea? A release every year and afterr a good summer of work? Does anybody have a better idea? FWIW: According to the headers, this mail is sent from the same machine as the original

Re: DPL Debate prepared questions list [Debian Policy Sucks]

2006-03-20 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On 20 Mar 2006, Ritesh Raj Sarraf said this: So what do you people suggest in such cases: 1) Intel 1000MT NIC sucks, throw it away ? 2) Unh! Why don't you change to Debian Unstable ? 3) Buddy! We are all volunteers. Go and roll your own kernel with the patches ? 4) Wait! That hardware

Re: e1000 support in Debian [Was: Re: DPL Debate prepared questions list [Debian Policy Sucks]]

2006-03-20 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 01:01:28AM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote: On 3/20/06, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 03:39:45PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: So what do you people suggest in such cases: 1) Intel 1000MT NIC sucks, throw it

Re: DPL Debate prepared questions list [Debian Policy Sucks]

2006-03-20 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: Now, there was a known issue with those cards with e1000 driver upto kernel 2.6.11, IIRC. Hmmm, and 2.6.12 panics (bug #327355 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) when I try and use the tape drive on my machine. New versions not only fix bugs, but introduce new ones, too.

Re: DPL Debate prepared questions list [Debian Policy Sucks]

2006-03-20 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Anthony DeRobertis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-20 20:04]: Hmmm, and 2.6.12 panics (bug #327355 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) when I try and use the tape drive on my machine. New versions not only Anthony, do you still see this bug with 2.6.15 or (better yet) 2.6.16? (will be uploaded tomorrow).

So we got caught, so what? But we did the right thing.

2006-03-20 Thread Greg Conner
It must be SCO. They have cleverly disguised themselves as BYU students. :-) -Roberto So we got caught trying to br BYU students. You guys win that battle. But you have to admit at least we care enough about Debian that we are willing to make suggestions. We don't want to offend anyone

Re: DPL Debate prepared questions list [Debian Policy Sucks]

2006-03-20 Thread Rui Silva
UBUNTU realy works, and is stable. I've instaled it on a few servers now, and i'm quite happy with it.but my question is. Why don't you just build your own kernel from source. download the vannilla souces and do it. it's not that hard on debian. it's easier on gentoo, but in debian it's almost

Re: DPL Debate prepared questions list [Debian Policy Sucks]

2006-03-20 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Rui Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-21 01:02]: Since debian is build thru volunteer, why don't you contribute whith something... FWIW, kmuto-san has prepated sarge d-i images with a modern kernel: http://kmuto.jp/b.cgi/debian/d-i-2615.htm And backports.org has modern kernels for sarge. --

Re: DPL Debate prepared questions list [Debian Policy Sucks]

2006-03-20 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
Martin Michlmayr wrote: Anthony, do you still see this bug with 2.6.15 or (better yet) 2.6.16? (will be uploaded tomorrow). 2.6.15, yes. I'll check 2.6.16 when it hits unstable (I'm guessing, though I still need to test, that the ide-tape cleanup in 2.6.9 borked it) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: Release Date Update

2006-03-20 Thread Ron Johnson
On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 23:45 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 05:39:23PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 23:15 +, Colin Watson wrote: On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 02:51:25PM -0800, Mark Shuttleworh wrote: (In case it wasn't clear, this wasn't Mark

Re: one binary package created by different source packages, will the old source package disappear?

2006-03-20 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 03:33:22PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: If foo2 already exists, I'd still go for that solution, but you'll then need to ask for foo2 removal via a bug to ftp.debian.org. That's not possible, I think, unfortunately - we don't want teTeX which currently provides

Re: Release Date Update

2006-03-20 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On 20 Mar 2006, Ron Johnson said: Well, true. I confess to northernhemisphereoentrism. Still, even though Brazil, ANZ South Africa are down under, the vast bulk of the world population lives in the Northern Hemisphere. The premise is also weak. Man, in the summer, I want to be

Re: I like the new Release

2006-03-20 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On 20 Mar 2006, Greg Conner outgrape: It make be fake but is it a bad idea? A release every year and afterr a good summer of work? Does anybody have a better idea? Go for it. Good luck on that. Let us know how it goes. manoj -- VMS must die! Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL

Re: I like the new Release

2006-03-20 Thread Hex Star
Lol...if you're going to impersonate someone...sign up for a free php host and use Hee-Haw PHP mailer...it spoofs the email address and IP...;-) XDOn 3/20/06, Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 20 Mar 2006, Greg Conner outgrape: It make be fake but is it a bad idea?A release every year

Re: So we got caught, so what? But we did the right thing.

2006-03-20 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On 20 Mar 2006, Greg Conner told this: It must be SCO. They have cleverly disguised themselves as BYU students. :-) -Roberto So we got caught trying to br BYU students. You guys win that battle. Not much of a battle. Y'all were pretty pathetic at forgery. But thanks for the

Bug#358080: ITP: pygaim -- python plugin support for gaim

2006-03-20 Thread Michael Spang
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Michael Spang [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: pygaim Version : 1.5.0 * URL : http://pygaim.sf.net * License : GPL Description : python bindings and plugin loader for gaim PyGaim allows the Gaim Instance Messaging

Re: DPL Debate prepared questions list [Debian Policy Sucks]

2006-03-20 Thread Christian Perrier
(dropping -curiosathe raised issue is a real issue) which are known to work with Debian Stable? 5) etch beta 2 was released last week with support for your hardware I'm not sure that many people are seriously considering an etch beta to install as a client's firewall solution. The

Re: shared libraries dependecy problem.

2006-03-20 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Grzegorz Bizon] Linda complains that: W: tleenx2; A binary links against a library that is not depended on. (By the way - shoudn't it be error rather than warning ?) No, because it's sometimes hard to fix and often harmless. We don't like it but error is too strong. I have checked binary

Re: Bug#358003: ITP: ttf-dzongkha -- TrueType fonts for Dzongkha language

2006-03-20 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Drew Parsons ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] This package includes fonts that are suitable for the display of the Dzongkha language. May I suggest for rare languages like this that you also mention

Re: Bruce Perens hosts party at OSCON Wednesday night

2006-03-20 Thread Paul Hedderly
On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 07:38:47PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 01:58:15PM -0300, Humberto Massa Guimar?es wrote: And to boot, an e-mail calling for curriculae for a recruiting party is on-topic to a DEVELOPERS list No. This is why the debian-jobs list exists.

Accepted octave-epstk 2.1-2 (source all)

2006-03-20 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 08:33:24 +0100 Source: octave-epstk Binary: octave-epstk Architecture: source all Version: 2.1-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Octave Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Rafael Laboissiere

Accepted python-f2py 2.45.241+1926-3 (source all)

2006-03-20 Thread Alexandre Fayolle
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 11:13:09 +0100 Source: python-f2py Binary: python-f2py python2.4-f2py python-f2py-doc python2.3-f2py Architecture: source all Version: 2.45.241+1926-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: José Fonseca

Accepted wengophone 0.99+svn4511-2 (source i386)

2006-03-20 Thread Marco Nenciarini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 10:48:01 +0100 Source: wengophone Binary: wengophone Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.99+svn4511-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Marco Nenciarini [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Marco Nenciarini

Accepted fox1.4 1.4.31-1 (source i386 all)

2006-03-20 Thread Torsten Landschoff
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 10:56:59 +0100 Source: fox1.4 Binary: libfox1.4-doc libfox1.4-dev libfox1.4 Architecture: source i386 all Version: 1.4.31-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Torsten Landschoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted libgnomecanvas 2.14.0-1 (source all i386)

2006-03-20 Thread Ondřej Surý
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 11:16:50 +0100 Source: libgnomecanvas Binary: libgnomecanvas2-doc libgnomecanvas2-common libgnomecanvas2-0 libgnomecanvas2-dev Architecture: source all i386 Version: 2.14.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low

Accepted spambayes 1.0.4-1 (source all)

2006-03-20 Thread Alexandre Fayolle
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 11:36:54 +0100 Source: spambayes Binary: spambayes Architecture: source all Version: 1.0.4-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Alexandre Fayolle [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Alexandre Fayolle [EMAIL

Accepted phpmyadmin 4:2.8.0.2-3 (source all)

2006-03-20 Thread Piotr Roszatycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 11:06:09 +0100 Source: phpmyadmin Binary: phpmyadmin Architecture: source all Version: 4:2.8.0.2-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Piotr Roszatycki [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Piotr Roszatycki

Accepted postfix-policyd 1.73-1 (source i386)

2006-03-20 Thread Ondřej Surý
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 11:09:56 +0100 Source: postfix-policyd Binary: postfix-policyd Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.73-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Ondřej Surý [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Ondřej Surý

Accepted curl 7.15.3-1 (source i386 all)

2006-03-20 Thread Domenico Andreoli
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 11:46:25 +0100 Source: curl Binary: libcurl3-dbg libcurl3 libcurl3-dev libcurl3-gnutls-dev libcurl3-openssl-dev libcurl3-gnutls curl Architecture: source i386 all Version: 7.15.3-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency:

Accepted surfraw 2.1.4 (source all)

2006-03-20 Thread Ian Beckwith
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 22:26:37 + Source: surfraw Binary: surfraw Architecture: source all Version: 2.1.4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian surfraw maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Ian Beckwith [EMAIL

Accepted desktop-profiles 1.4.11 (source all)

2006-03-20 Thread cobaco
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 18:38:59 +0100 Source: desktop-profiles Binary: desktop-profiles Architecture: source all Version: 1.4.11 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Bart Cornelis (cobaco) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Bart

Accepted python-ldap 2.0.11-2 (source i386 all)

2006-03-20 Thread Matej Vela
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 12:29:57 +0100 Source: python-ldap Binary: python2.4-ldap python2.3-ldap python-ldap-doc python-ldap Architecture: source i386 all Version: 2.0.11-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Matej Vela [EMAIL

Accepted beagle 0.2.3-1 (source i386 all)

2006-03-20 Thread Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 17:20:49 +0100 Source: beagle Binary: beagle python-beagle beagle-dev beagle-backend-evolution libbeagle0 Architecture: source i386 all Version: 0.2.3-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Jose Carlos

Accepted libmodule-install-perl 0.61-1 (source all)

2006-03-20 Thread eloy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 12:35:42 +0100 Source: libmodule-install-perl Binary: libmodule-install-perl Architecture: source all Version: 0.61-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Perl Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By:

Accepted zlibc 0.9k-1 (source i386)

2006-03-20 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 11:59:35 +0100 Source: zlibc Binary: zlibc Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.9k-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Francesco Paolo Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Francesco Paolo Lovergine

Accepted pango1.0 1.12.0-1 (source all powerpc)

2006-03-20 Thread Jordi Mallach
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 12:11:29 +0100 Source: pango1.0 Binary: libpango1.0-dev libpango1.0-0 libpango1.0-doc libpango1.0-udeb libpango1.0-dbg libpango1.0-common Architecture: source powerpc all Version: 1.12.0-1 Distribution: unstable

Accepted toppler 1.1.2a-2 (source i386)

2006-03-20 Thread Bill Allombert
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 11:45:10 +0100 Source: toppler Binary: toppler Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.1.2a-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted zlibc 0.9k-2 (source i386)

2006-03-20 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 14:16:25 +0100 Source: zlibc Binary: zlibc Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.9k-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Francesco Paolo Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Francesco Paolo Lovergine

Accepted gmetadom 0.2.3-6 (source i386)

2006-03-20 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 00:21:07 -0500 Source: gmetadom Binary: libgdome2-cpp-smart0c2a libgdome2-cpp-smart-dev libgdome2-ocaml-dev libgdome2-ocaml Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.2.3-6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer:

Accepted mesa 6.4.1-0.4 (source i386 all)

2006-03-20 Thread David Nusinow
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 21:46:18 -0500 Source: mesa Binary: libgl1-mesa-swx11-dev libgl1-mesa-glx libosmesa6-dev libgl1-mesa-dev libosmesa6 mesa-swx11-source libglu1-mesa-dev mesa-common-dev libglu1-mesa libgl1-mesa-dri

Accepted denyhosts 2.2-1 (source all)

2006-03-20 Thread Marco Bertorello
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 13:30:34 +0100 Source: denyhosts Binary: denyhosts denyhosts-python2.3 denyhosts-common denyhosts-python2.4 Architecture: source all Version: 2.2-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Marco Bertorello

Accepted libimage-librsvg-perl 0.07-2 (source i386)

2006-03-20 Thread eloy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 14:59:42 +0100 Source: libimage-librsvg-perl Binary: libimage-librsvg-perl Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.07-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Perl Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By:

Accepted pbuilder 0.150 (source all)

2006-03-20 Thread Junichi Uekawa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 23:31:26 +0900 Source: pbuilder Binary: pbuilder Architecture: source all Version: 0.150 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian pbuilder maintenance team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Junichi Uekawa

Accepted libsigsegv 2.2-4 (source i386)

2006-03-20 Thread Peter Van Eynde
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 14:50:21 +0100 Source: libsigsegv Binary: libsigsegv-dev Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.2-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Peter Van Eynde [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Peter Van Eynde [EMAIL

Accepted user-mode-linux 2.6.15-1um-1 (source i386)

2006-03-20 Thread Stefano Melchior
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:40:54 +0100 Source: user-mode-linux Binary: user-mode-linux Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.6.15-1um-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Stefano Melchior [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Stefano

Accepted zsh-beta 4.3.2-dev-1+20060317-1 (source sparc all)

2006-03-20 Thread Clint Adams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 21:20:37 -0500 Source: zsh-beta Binary: zsh-beta-static zsh-beta-doc zsh-beta Architecture: source sparc all Version: 4.3.2-dev-1+20060317-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Clint Adams [EMAIL

Accepted fail2ban 0.6.1-1 (source all)

2006-03-20 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 23:11:53 -0500 Source: fail2ban Binary: fail2ban Architecture: source all Version: 0.6.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Yaroslav Halchenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted firebird2 1.5.3.4870-3 (source i386)

2006-03-20 Thread Damyan Ivanov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 11:55:19 +0200 Source: firebird2 Binary: firebird2-utils-classic libfbclient1 firebird2-super-server libfbembed1 firebird2-dev firebird2-server-common firebird2-utils-super firebird2-examples

Accepted libcatalyst-modules-perl 0.11 (source all)

2006-03-20 Thread eloy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 16:25:28 +0100 Source: libcatalyst-modules-perl Binary: libcatalyst-modules-perl Architecture: source all Version: 0.11 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Catalyst Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted libcli 1.8.6-1 (source i386)

2006-03-20 Thread Jonathan McDowell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 16:47:49 + Source: libcli Binary: libcli-dev libcli1 Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.8.6-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Jonathan McDowell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Jonathan McDowell

  1   2   >