Bonjour,
Ca fait déjà quelque temps que je teste des systèmes de contrôle
de version (SCM) distribués mais je n'arrive pas à me fixer sur
un en particulier (le sujet n'est pas ici le pour ou contre
les SCM distribués).
J'ai déjà laissé tomber tla trop complexe pour les tâches à
accomplir et son
Le Mar 11 Avril 2006 16:23, Jérôme Marant a écrit :
Bonjour,
Ca fait déjà quelque temps que je teste des systèmes de contrôle
de version (SCM) distribués mais je n'arrive pas à me fixer sur
un en particulier (le sujet n'est pas ici le pour ou contre
les SCM distribués).
J'ai fait le même
Julien Danjou [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 04:23:04PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
mercurial: efficace, interface simple, écrit en python
Mais: pas de support merge+rename, pas de partage efficace par HTTP
sauf via un serveur défié
Les checkout sont aussi tres
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Jérôme Marant wrote:
git/cogito: efficace, partage efficace par HTTP via packed objects,
référentiel très compact
C'est vrai référentiel très compact ? De ce que j'avais compris, git a
commencé comme un simple archivage
Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Le Mar 11 Avril 2006 16:23, Jérôme Marant a écrit :
Bonjour,
Ca fait déjà quelque temps que je teste des systèmes de contrôle
de version (SCM) distribués mais je n'arrive pas à me fixer sur
un en particulier (le sujet n'est pas ici le pour ou contre
Le Mar 11 Avril 2006 22:01, Jérôme Marant a écrit :
Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Le Mar 11 Avril 2006 16:23, Jérôme Marant a écrit :
Bonjour,
Ca fait déjà quelque temps que je teste des systèmes de contrôle
de version (SCM) distribués mais je n'arrive pas à me fixer sur
Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mal à la tête ? Pour tla, je te l'accorde. Mais darcs est plutôt
très simple, non ?
oui, et non. pour mes dotfiles, c'est parfait. Mais lorsque tu veux
gérer des branches, ça fait mal à la tête. développer à plusieurs avec
est sans doute
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 09:55:54PM +0200, J??r??me Marant wrote:
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, J??r??me Marant wrote:
git/cogito: efficace, partage efficace par HTTP via packed objects,
r??f??rentiel tr??s compact
C'est vrai r??f??rentiel tr??s compact
Jérôme Marant wrote:
Julien Danjou [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 04:23:04PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
mercurial: efficace, interface simple, écrit en python
Mais: pas de support merge+rename, pas de partage efficace par HTTP
sauf via un serveur défié
Les
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
Really? I get spam addressed to ftp, cyrus (the Cyrus IMAP system),
postfix, apache, daemon, etc etc all the time. Those are very common
user names, and (even better for the spammers) their mail is typically
aliased to a group of people. They're
Eduard Bloch wrote:
Yep. WRT you said above, what abot renaming WindowManagers/Modules to
$wm Modules (one level above WM starters and indicating which
modules are meant by that).
One more thing to consider is that if we will have to to move/rename
modules in the future (current situation is
Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Le Lun 10 Avril 2006 19:41, Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
Anthony Towns a écrit :
Hi,
This is a reject of the new -bin packages (both of them).
The issues with the -bin package are that it may cause upgrade
problems, both in that upgrading from
Forwarding to debian-glibc.
Please don't CC debian-devel on replies.
MfG
Goswin
Luo Yong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here's some problem occured when I cross compiling glibc.
==
In file included from ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/libc-lowlevellock.c:21:
Le Mar 11 Avril 2006 11:05, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Le Lun 10 Avril 2006 19:41, Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
Anthony Towns a écrit :
Hi,
This is a reject of the new -bin packages (both of them).
The issues with the -bin package are
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 11:51:26AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Le Mar 11 Avril 2006 11:05, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
I'm assuming libc6 depends on libc-bin and libc-bin depends on libc6
here. The former is needed to always pull in libc-bin on upgrades and
the later is needed to
Dear all!
I am moving out the GFDL documentation from the texinfo package and want
to ask whether the following procedure is the right way to do it:
Current status:
source package: texinfo
orig file: texinfo_4.8.orig.tar.gz
binary packages:texinfo_4.8-8, info_4.8-8
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alberto Furia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: ossec-hids
Version : 0.7
Upstream Author : Daniel B. Cid dcid at ossec dot net
* URL : http://www.ossec.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description :
Le Mar 11 Avril 2006 12:09, Steve Langasek a écrit :
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 11:51:26AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Le Mar 11 Avril 2006 11:05, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
I'm assuming libc6 depends on libc-bin and libc-bin depends on
libc6 here. The former is needed to always pull
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 11:51:26AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Le Mar 11 Avril 2006 11:05, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
I'm assuming libc6 depends on libc-bin and libc-bin depends on libc6
here. The former is needed to always pull in libc-bin on
Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Le Mar 11 Avril 2006 11:05, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
I'm assuming libc6 depends on libc-bin and libc-bin depends on libc6
here. The former is needed to always pull in libc-bin on upgrades and
the later is needed to ensure the minimum version
On Tuesday 11 April 2006 15:08, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
When doing a full upgrade (stable-unstable) could it happen that apt
breaks the libc6-libc-bin depends cycle and put them into seperate
dpkg calls? I don't remember how smart/stupid libapt was there. It
might be best to add apt-get
* Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060411 15:27]:
On Tuesday 11 April 2006 15:08, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
When doing a full upgrade (stable-unstable) could it happen that apt
breaks the libc6-libc-bin depends cycle and put them into seperate
dpkg calls? I don't remember how smart/stupid
Le Mar 11 Avril 2006 15:08, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
right, but that makes a nasty circular dependency I thought we
should avoid at any rate ? Shouldn't libc-bin rather conflicts with
bad version of the libc ?
I think that circle is unavoidable.
right, I forgot about the dpkg
Hi !
I'm creating a meta package for install a lite desktop for old
machines with poor hardware.
I would like to receive opinions about my packages list:
- x-window-system-core
- xfce4 (beautiful!)
- gdm
- gftp
- mozilla-firefox
- mozilla-thunderbird
- menu
- gcalctool (or xcalc)
- evince
- eog
On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 13:44 -0300, André Luiz Rodrigues Ferreira wrote:
Hi !
I'm creating a meta package for install a lite desktop for old
machines with poor hardware.
Great task.
I would like to receive opinions about my packages list:
- x-window-system-core
- xfce4 (beautiful!)
Yeah
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 01:56:50AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
#include hallo.h
* Bill Allombert [Tue, Apr 11 2006, 12:34:45AM]:
Yep. WRT you said above, what abot renaming WindowManagers/Modules to
$wm Modules (one level above WM starters and indicating which
modules are meant by that).
I
Le Mar 11 Avril 2006 18:40, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt a écrit :
I'd like to implement the proposals I made in (2.1) and (2.2) as fast
as possible, especially applying the rules in (2.2) to people already
in the queue waiting for an AM.
I agree both points are a good thing, and should be
On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 13:44 -0300, André Luiz Rodrigues Ferreira wrote:
Hi !
I'm creating a meta package for install a lite desktop for old
machines with poor hardware.
I would like to receive opinions about my packages list:
- x-window-system-core
- xfce4 (beautiful!)
- gdm
- gftp
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 13:44:57 -0300
André Luiz Rodrigues Ferreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi !
I'm creating a meta package for install a lite desktop for old
machines with poor hardware.
That's an admiral goal, however I would be prepared for a
Hello,
What's the general consensus on this?
http://www.eiffel.com/general/news/2006/2006_04_05_pr.html
A good move?
Or dangerous?
Regards,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 06:29:44PM +0800, Katipo wrote:
Hello,
What's the general consensus on this?
http://www.eiffel.com/general/news/2006/2006_04_05_pr.html
A good move?
Or dangerous?
Regards,
There's nothing wrong with that -- MySQL does the very same thing, and
has been doing so
HOLA!!!
Te invito a conocer mi nueva pagina Web con nuevas fotos y nuevos precios!!!
www.perfumes.com.py
Fragancias con la misma calidad de siempre: C. Dior, Carolina Herrera, H. Boss,
C. Kleyn, etc. para hombres y mujeres. Más de 70 variedades. Precios desde Gs
40.000 a Gs 115.000
Solicita
Hello
Just wanted to show you what I did in a few hours. Any comments or
wishes for extensions/changes are welcome. Preferably with patches.
http://io.debian.net/~tar/bugstats/
Cheers,
Gürkan
btw, this runs on debian gnu/kfreebsd.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dear all!
I am moving out the GFDL documentation from the texinfo package and want
to ask whether the following procedure is the right way to do it:
Current status:
source package: texinfo
orig file: texinfo_4.8.orig.tar.gz
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 06:29:44PM +0800, Katipo wrote:
Hello,
What's the general consensus on this?
If Eiffel Studio is under GPL, then it can be included in Debian.
There isn't really much else to it, as far as Debian is concerned.
There is already an ITP on it:
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 01:53:29PM +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
I am moving out the GFDL documentation from the texinfo package and want
to ask whether the following procedure is the right way to do it:
Current status:
source package: texinfo
orig file:
* Andr Luiz Rodrigues Ferreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060411 18:45]:
- x-window-system-core
- xfce4 (beautiful!)
- gdm
[...]
- gnome-ppp
- gnome-utils
Definitions differ, but I'd not call something light pulling in
half of gnome. What about Debian Light Gnome Desktop?
Hochachtungsvoll,
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 01:10:39AM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to upload a new mailman package, but this is failing
utterly. Could someone please help me? Thanks in advance.
I'm uploading the exact packages at
http://people.debian.org/~lmamane/mailman/ with dput to the
Hi,
I'm trying to upload a new mailman package, but this is failing
utterly. Could someone please help me? Thanks in advance.
I'm uploading the exact packages at
http://people.debian.org/~lmamane/mailman/ with dput to the
anonymous queue on ftp-master. The upload goes well, I see them if I
ftp
I've been trying to reach Thorsten Sauter for some time now. I've sent
him a couple emails over the last month and have heard nothing back. I
was recently involved in an NMU of libphp-adodb, which he maintains and
was 6 months out of date and had serveral security problems. There was
even a
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 01:44:57PM -0300, Andr? Luiz Rodrigues Ferreira wrote:
Hi !
I'm creating a meta package for install a lite desktop for old
machines with poor hardware.
I would like to receive opinions about my packages list:
- x-window-system-core
Note that this metapackage, as
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 06:40:34PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
2.1 Multiple advocates
--
Ask for more than one advocate (at the moment, I'm thinking about
two). This should get the number of people advocated with a Errr,
I met him, he seemed nice down. At the
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 06:40:34PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
2.1 Multiple advocates
--
Ask for more than one advocate (at the moment, I'm thinking about
two). This should get the number of people advocated with a Errr,
I met
Hello,
my comments as someone planning to enter NM during the next couple of
month follow.
Overall I find your analysis enlightening. I agree with those points I
do not discuss here.
1.2.1 Add more people
[Marc argues that this is not a long solution]
I disagree here up to a certain point. I
Dear Marc and fellow Debian friends,
Thanks for this cogent and clear summary of the problem as you see it.
It reminds me a bit of the problem of scientific peer-review; for-pay
journals often ask people to donate their limitted time reviewing
other people's work. Although the journal profits,
Sorry, the message was intended for d-p, please do not follow up here.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 19:46:28 -0500
Source: design
Binary: r-cran-design
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0.12-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dirk Eddelbuettel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Dirk Eddelbuettel [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 19:49:17 -0500
Source: misc3d
Binary: r-cran-misc3d
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.3-1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dirk Eddelbuettel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Dirk Eddelbuettel [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:36:11 -0500
Source: x11proto-resource
Binary: x11proto-resource-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debian-x@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:36:08 -0500
Source: x11proto-randr
Binary: x11proto-randr-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.1.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debian-x@lists.debian.org
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:36:23 -0500
Source: x11proto-trap
Binary: x11proto-trap-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.4.3-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debian-x@lists.debian.org
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 22:27:46 -0400
Source: lsb
Binary: lsb-desktop lsb-core lsb-cxx lsb-base lsb-release lsb-qt4 lsb
lsb-graphics
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 3.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Chris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:35:56 -0500
Source: x11proto-bigreqs
Binary: x11proto-bigreqs-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debian-x@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:36:07 -0500
Source: x11proto-kb
Binary: x11proto-kb-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debian-x@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: David
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:35:57 -0500
Source: x11proto-composite
Binary: x11proto-composite-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debian-x@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 19:25:02 -0400
Source: x11proto-render
Binary: render-dev x11proto-render-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2:0.9.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:36:30 -0500
Source: x11proto-xf86dga
Binary: x11proto-xf86dga-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debian-x@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 22:44:24 -0500
Source: libice
Binary: libice-dev libice6-dbg libice6
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:1.0.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debian-x@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:36:02 -0500
Source: x11proto-fixes
Binary: x11proto-fixes-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.0.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debian-x@lists.debian.org
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:36:03 -0500
Source: x11proto-fontcache
Binary: x11proto-fontcache-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.1.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debian-x@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:36:26 -0500
Source: x11proto-xcmisc
Binary: x11proto-xcmisc-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.1.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debian-x@lists.debian.org
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:36:35 -0500
Source: x11proto-xinerama
Binary: x11proto-xinerama-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.1.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debian-x@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:36:37 -0500
Source: x11proto-core
Binary: x-dev x11proto-core-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 7.0.4-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debian-x@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:36:09 -0500
Source: x11proto-record
Binary: x11proto-record-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.13.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debian-x@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:36:01 -0500
Source: x11proto-evie
Binary: x11proto-evie-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 1:1.0.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debian-x@lists.debian.org
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:35:59 -0500
Source: x11proto-damage
Binary: x11proto-damage-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.3-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debian-x@lists.debian.org
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 22:44:22 -0500
Source: libfontenc
Binary: libfontenc-dev libfontenc1-dbg libfontenc1
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:1.0.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:36:31 -0500
Source: x11proto-xf86dri
Binary: x11proto-xf86dri-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.3-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debian-x@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:36:25 -0500
Source: x11proto-video
Binary: x11proto-video-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.2.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debian-x@lists.debian.org
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:36:05 -0500
Source: x11proto-gl
Binary: x11proto-gl-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.4.6-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debian-x@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: David
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 22:44:25 -0500
Source: libsm
Binary: libsm-dev libsm6-dbg libsm6
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:1.0.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debian-x@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2006 13:28:17 -0400
Source: xorg
Binary: xlibs-static-dev xlibmesa-dri xserver-xorg-video-all xserver-xfree86
xserver-xorg x11-common xorg-dev xlibmesa-gl-dev xserver-xorg-input-all
libglu1-xorg-dev libglu1-xorg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 22:44:23 -0500
Source: libfs
Binary: libfs-dev libfs6-dbg libfs6
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2:1.0.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debian-x@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:36:29 -0500
Source: x11proto-xf86bigfont
Binary: x11proto-xf86bigfont-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.1.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debian-x@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:36:32 -0500
Source: x11proto-xf86misc
Binary: x11proto-xf86misc-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debian-x@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:36:00 -0500
Source: x11proto-dmx
Binary: x11proto-dmx-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.2.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debian-x@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: David
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:36:34 -0500
Source: x11proto-xf86vidmode
Binary: x11proto-xf86vidmode-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.2.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debian-x@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 22:44:19 -0500
Source: libdmx
Binary: libdmx-dev libdmx1 libdmx1-dbg
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:1.0.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debian-x@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:36:06 -0500
Source: x11proto-input
Binary: x11proto-input-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.3.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debian-x@lists.debian.org
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:36:28 -0500
Source: x11proto-xext
Binary: x11proto-xext-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 7.0.2-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debian-x@lists.debian.org
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:36:04 -0500
Source: x11proto-fonts
Binary: x11proto-fonts-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debian-x@lists.debian.org
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2006 14:34:09 -0400
Source: x11proto-scrnsaver
Binary: x11proto-scrnsaver-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.1.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debian-x@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 22:44:31 -0500
Source: libxcursor
Binary: libxcursor1-dbg libxcursor-dev libxcursor1
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.1.5.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 22:44:26 -0500
Source: libx11
Binary: libx11-6-dbg libx11-data libx11-6 libx11-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2:1.0.0-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 22:44:30 -0500
Source: libxcomposite
Binary: libxcomposite1-dbg libxcomposite-dev libxcomposite1
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:0.2.2.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 22:44:28 -0500
Source: libxau
Binary: libxau6 libxau6-dbg libxau-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:1.0.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debian-x@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 22:44:29 -0500
Source: libxaw
Binary: libxaw6-dev libxaw-headers libxaw7-dbg libxaw7 libxaw7-dev libxaw6-dbg
libxaw6
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 1:1.0.1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 20:25:03 -0500
Source: xserver-xorg-input-jamstudio
Binary: xserver-xorg-input-jamstudio
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:1.0.0.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 22:44:41 -0500
Source: libxinerama
Binary: libxinerama-dev libxinerama1-dbg libxinerama1
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:1.0.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 22:44:43 -0500
Source: libxkbfile
Binary: libxkbfile1 libxkbfile1-dbg libxkbfile-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:1.0.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 20:24:57 -0500
Source: xserver-xorg-input-elo2300
Binary: xserver-xorg-input-elo2300
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:1.0.0.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 20:25:54 -0500
Source: xserver-xorg-video-siliconmotion
Binary: xserver-xorg-video-siliconmotion
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:1.3.1.5-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 20:25:39 -0500
Source: xserver-xorg-video-i740
Binary: xserver-xorg-video-i740
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:1.0.0.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 20:25:46 -0500
Source: xserver-xorg-video-nsc
Binary: xserver-xorg-video-nsc
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:2.7.6.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 22:44:58 -0500
Source: libxkbui
Binary: libxkbui1 libxkbui-dev libxkbui1-dbg
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:1.0.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 22:44:39 -0500
Source: libxfont
Binary: libxfont1-dbg libxfont1 libxfont-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:1.0.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 19:49:23 -0400
Source: xbase-clients
Binary: xbase-clients
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:7.0.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debian-x@lists.debian.org
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 22:44:33 -0500
Source: libxdamage
Binary: libxdamage-dev libxdamage1-dbg libxdamage1
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:1.0.2.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 22:44:40 -0500
Source: xft
Binary: libxft-dev libxft2 libxft2-dbg
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.1.8.2-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debian-x@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 22:46:31 -0500
Source: libxvmc
Binary: libxvmc-dev libxvmc1 libxvmc1-dbg
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:1.0.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debian-x@lists.debian.org
1 - 100 of 234 matches
Mail list logo
