THIS IS AN AUTO-GENERATED MESSAGE - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE
The text block received is bad. Please check the text block you sent for
correctness, and try again.
If the problem persists, please try some other method of registration.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 25 May 2006, Stephen Frost verbalised:
* Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Explanation? What we have here is an act of bad faith, in the guise
of demonstrating a weakness. In my experience, one act of bad faith
often leads to others.
pffft. This is taking it to an extreme. He
Thomas Girard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Selon Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Debian policy says:
| 8.2 Run-time support programs
|
| If your package has some run-time support programs which use the
| shared library you must not put them in the shared library
| package. If you do
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 06:58:08PM -0500, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 06:14:51PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 04:18:44PM -0500, Anthony Towns wrote:
Anyway, the background is that James Troup, Jeroen van Wolffelaar and
myself examined the license
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 06:27:53PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060524 17:54]:
So I guess you can still criticize folks for this if you want to, but I know
that my own ongoing notion of best practices comes from stuff I learned
long ago plus new ideas
On 25 May 2006, Gunnar Wolf said:
Manoj Srivastava dijo [Thu, May 25, 2006 at 02:36:37AM -0500]:
Hi,
It has come to my attention that Martin Kraff used an unofficial,
and easily forge-able, identity device at a large key signing party
recently. This was apparently to belabour the obvious
* Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On 25 May 2006, Stephen Frost spake thusly:
I wasn't making any claim as to the general validity of IDs which
are purchased and I'm rather annoyed that you attempted to
extrapolate it out to such. What I said is that he wasn't trying to
fake
I have seen on the internet that someone wanted to port debian to minix3, but
the report was old. Is there anyone that wants to port? I find it usefull.
I don't have the ability to do it, but if it works I will switch to it [ the
next versionof minix will handle driver crashes(no more nasty fs
On May 25, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In Debian, up until the removal of on-boot depmod, you did NOT have to run
depmod. This is a fact, plain and simple. The fact that this does not hold
Only if you rebooted after manually installing modules, which I think
everybody
Your message dated Wed, 17 May 2006 09:32:04 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Accepted kchmviewer 2.0-1 (source i386)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hello!
/me playing the devil's advocate instead of Enrico...
On Fri, 26 May 2006 08:32:43 +0200, David Moreno Garza wrote:
As an additional bit of security, I asked some people to show their
visa, issued by the Mexican government, or check the Mexican seal
they got on their point of entrance
Le mercredi 24 mai 2006 à 19:18 +0100, Ian Jackson a écrit :
However, it has come to my attention that at least one developer
appears to be reading debian-private at their gmail account.
And at least hundreds of people appear to be reading debian-private on
slashdot news.
--
.''`.
Le jeudi 25 mai 2006 à 02:36 -0500, Manoj Srivastava a écrit :
It has come to my attention that Martin Kraff used an
unofficial, and easily forge-able, identity device at a large key
signing party recently.
FWIW, I'm pretty sure Martin presented me an official German ID card.
But
My memory is horrible, but IIRC James Troup (ie, our keymaster..) did
some similar study at the DebConf5 KSP and ended up with a list of
people whose GPG signtures he didn't trust anymore because of whatever
trick they fell for.
This thread seems entirely blown out of porportion.
--
see shy jo
Le mercredi 24 mai 2006 à 16:01 -0700, Erast Benson a écrit :
Thanks for all replies.
In a private email you sent me, you said you were going to stop posting
on Debian mailing lists. This was just another lie.
Furthermore this email was full of allegations and insults while you
perfectly knew
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ian Jackson wrote:
Kevin B. McCarty writes (Re: sending debian-private postings to gmail):
Ian Jackson wrote:
[snip]
distributed to computers whose owners and operators cannot be expected
to refrain from processing the content in other ways.
Enrico Zini wrote:
However, from the book you don't get the address of madduck's home,
which is what you want when you have to go and drag him to jail if he
willingly uploads some malicious code.
None of my ID documents tell you my address either. Is there any reason
why they should?
This
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% grep-dctrl -F Priority required
/var/lib/apt/lists/storage_debian-amd64_dists_stable_main_binary-amd64_Packages
-s Section | sort | uniq -c
1 Section: admin
36 Section: base
1 Section: devel
12 Section: libs
1
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 04:08:31PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
He didn't try to dupe people and this claim is getting rather old.
Duping people would have actually been putting false information on the
ID and generating a fake key and trying to get someone to sign off on
the fake key based on
On 25 May 2006, Andreas Tille spake thusly:
On Thu, 25 May 2006, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
It has come to my attention that Martin Kraff used an
unofficial, and easily forge-able, identity device at a large key
Is there any reason to revoke my signature I have put on
Martin's key after he
On Thu, 25 May 2006, Enrico Zini wrote:
This prompts me that we should probably be taking trusted notes of birth
dates and birth places, because it's hard to physically trace one person
down just given his or her name.
At this point, it would be best to have all DDs actually enter into legally
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 02:12:25PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On 25 May 2006, Stephen Frost spake thusly:
pffft. This is taking it to an extreme. He wasn't trying to fake
who he was, it just wasn't an ID issued by a generally recognized
government (or perhaps not a government at all,
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 02:12:25PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
He has already bragged about how he cracked the KSP by
presenting an unofficial ID which he bought -- an action designed to
show the weakness of signing parties. So, this was a bad faith act,
since the action was not
#include hallo.h
* Margarita Manterola [Wed, May 24 2006, 11:56:05PM]:
What about using depmod -a instead, how much would it cost? AFAICS it
only needs to walk trough the directories and stat the files without
reading them.
This is what's being done currently, as far as I know, and it takes
Hello Goswin,
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Le mardi 23 mai 2006 à 20:52 +0200, Marco d'Itri a écrit :
So, does anybody mind if I remove depmod from the module-init-tools init
script?
Please go ahead. Anything relying on it is
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Fry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: libjung-java
Version : 1.7.4
Upstream Author : Joshua O'Madadhain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Java
Description
* Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060526 10:17]:
My memory is horrible, but IIRC James Troup (ie, our keymaster..) did
some similar study at the DebConf5 KSP and ended up with a list of
people whose GPG signtures he didn't trust anymore because of whatever
trick they fell for.
I know that
On Thursday 25 May 2006 15:26, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 04:16:24PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The KSP was cracked, People signed a key without ever looking
at proper, official ID. You can try and save face by calling it
whatever you want,
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It has come to my attention that Martin Kraff used an
unofficial, and easily forge-able, identity device at a large key
signing party recently. This was apparently to belabour the obvious
point that large KSP's are events where it is hard
James Troup wrote:
My key was part of the DC4 KSP materials, but I didn't manage to
attend in the end. A couple of people signed my key despite my lack
of attendance and one of them an NM applicant, IIRC. Again from
memory, Martin talked to the NM in question who was very apologetic,
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Hi,
It has come to my attention that Martin Kraff used an
unofficial, and easily forge-able, identity device at a large key
signing party recently. This was apparently to belabour the obvious
point that large KSP's are events where it is hard to
On 5/25/06, Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Le mardi 23 mai 2006 à 20:52 +0200, Marco d'Itri a écrit :
So, does anybody mind if I remove depmod from the module-init-tools init
script?
Please go ahead. Anything relying on it is buggy
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On 25 May 2006, Stephen Frost verbalised:
* Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Explanation? What we have here is an act of bad faith, in the guise
of demonstrating a weakness. In my experience, one act of bad faith
often leads to others.
pffft. This
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 10:07:00AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Say you have a binary package (Multi-Arch: no) firfox and a
library/plugin package firefox-mplayer-plugin.
This could be handled by firefox having a Provides:
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would say, off hand, that section 8.2 is for people who want
to provide a shared library for other packages, with a stable ABI,
and a development package to facilitate linking to their
library. There are certain hoops we must jump in
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually, passports are not really an answer (I have no idea
what the passport of cameroon looke like, for example). Given time,
one can pay more attention to each document (I require at least two
photo ID's issued by the government).
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Enrico Zini wrote:
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 09:42:07AM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
[snip]
People write books in the name of someone else fairly often, actually.
No, I'm not only thinking about the Bible :)
There's professional book writers who
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 285 (new: 3)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 77 (new: 0)
Total number of packages
Marco d'Itri wrote:
So, does anybody mind if I remove depmod from the module-init-tools init
script?
I guess it would be a time-saver to remove the depmod call.
However, since one cannot run depmod properly without the respective
kernel being installed, removing the depmod call will caus harm.
Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Maybe we should just drop holding KSPs, and fall back to the
traditional method of Hey, nice dinner we had yesterday. Say, now
that you know me, my family and my history, would you like to sign my
key as well? - Signing for people you actually know, not just linking
faces
* Manoj Srivastava:
I will not be signing his keys, ever, based on this action of
what I consider to be bad faith. Based on discussion with other
people who seem to find this action amusing, but not unacceptable, I
find that my decision to vaive my personal requirements of two
On May 25, Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about having module-init-tools run depmod when needed and have all
other packages rely on that? That way it would run at most once.
And how would module-init-tools be supposd to know when it would be
needed to run depmod?
--
ciao,
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
and not showing any passports or showing passports:
[...]
- which did not had the *same* spelling as the name in the key (letter by
letter)
will not get a signature from me.
While you're obviously free to set your own standards as to whose keys
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 25 May 2006, Stephen Frost verbalised:
* Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Explanation? What we have here is an act of bad faith, in the guise
of demonstrating a weakness. In my experience, one act of bad faith
often leads to others.
#include hallo.h
* Marco d'Itri [Thu, May 25 2006, 09:36:11AM]:
On May 24, Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about using depmod -a instead, how much would it cost? AFAICS it
We already do.
Eh, typo, should have been depmod -A. I think this is a sufficiently
time-optimized version
Le Thu, May 25, 2006 at 07:29:43PM -0400, Charles Fry a écrit :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Fry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: libjung-java
Version : 1.7.4
Upstream Author : Joshua O'Madadhain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 04:30:07PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On 25 May 2006, Andreas Tille spake thusly:
Is there any reason to revoke my signature I have put on
Martin's key after he showed me his passport?
In my opinion, yes, if you consider subverting the KSP like
that
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On 25 May 2006, Andreas Tille spake thusly:
On Thu, 25 May 2006, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
It has come to my attention that Martin Kraff used an
unofficial, and easily forge-able, identity device at a large key
Is there any reason to revoke my signature I have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello!
Is there somebody in Shanghai from Debian able to check my ID and sign
my key? If there is none, is there somebody in Singapore, where I might
be able to go? I wouldn't be able to go in Hongkong (because of visa
problems) where I could see
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 10:11:55PM -0400, Travis Crump wrote:
Who actually has two forms of government issued picture ID[not counting
a passport which I never take anywhere unless I really need to since it
is really bad to lose it and doesn't fit in a wallet, not to mention my
passport photo
On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 16:16 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On 25 May 2006, Stephen Frost spake thusly:
* Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On 25 May 2006, Stephen Frost spake thusly:
I wasn't making any claim as to the general validity of IDs which
are purchased and I'm rather
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Franz Pletz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: pympd
Version : 0.06.1
Upstream Author : pympd Dev Team
* URL : http://http://pympd.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Frontend
Travis Crump [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Who actually has two forms of government issued picture ID[not counting
a passport which I never take anywhere unless I really need to since it
is really bad to lose it and doesn't fit in a wallet, not to mention my
passport photo isn't a very good
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 5/25/06, Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Le mardi 23 mai 2006 à 20:52 +0200, Marco d'Itri a écrit :
So, does anybody mind if I remove depmod from the module-init-tools init
script?
On May 26, Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, Im asking to have _one_ delay at a defined point instead of X
packages having a delay because they might have to run depmod manualy.
This is not a choice, every package which installs modules must run
depmod or they will not be
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 12:10:09AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
At Debconf Joey Hess and I have integrated support for the graphical
installer into the main build system for d-i. For now the support is for
i386 only, but amd64 [1] and powerpc will follow very soon.
I've integrated the existing
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 11:06:31AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On 26 May 2006, Thiemo Seufer outgrape:
Keysigning isn't for judging behaviour but for confirming identity.
* Michael Meskes:
This may be a silly question but doesn't my signature only state
that I certify this key
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 08:00:23PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
FWIW, I noted down those keys I would *not* sign and didn't tell the people
at the KSP that I would not sign them. I guess his experiment only one in
ten said that they would *not* sign it is moot unless he backs it
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 01:49:20AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
The maintainer, at some point during a private conversation, even
discouraged me to upload to *experimental* a new version of sysklogd
fixing the issues I have prepared. That's why they ended up in my
p.d.o page (they are
* Goswin von Brederlow:
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Goswin von Brederlow:
Doesn't work if the key is ever compromised and a new one has to be
created out of schedule. Or when you spend your x-mas holidays away
from your system and couldn't upgrade before new years eve.
On 26 May 2006, Florian Weimer outgrape:
* Manoj Srivastava:
I will not be signing his keys, ever, based on this action of what
I consider to be bad faith. Based on discussion with other people
who seem to find this action amusing, but not unacceptable, I find
that my decision to vaive my
On 25 May 2006, Goswin von Brederlow uttered the following:
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would say, off hand, that section 8.2 is for people who want
to provide a shared library for other packages, with a stable ABI,
and a development package to facilitate linking to their
On 5/26/06, Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While you're obviously free to set your own standards as to whose keysyou sign and not, I have come to the conclusion that the exact samespelling requirement doesn't make that much sense.As an example, take
Bdale whose real name isn't Bdale, but
On 25 May 2006, Thomas Bushnell told this:
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It has come to my attention that Martin Kraff used an unofficial,
and easily forge-able, identity device at a large key signing party
recently. This was apparently to belabour the obvious point that
large
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 11:20:26PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mercredi 24 mai 2006 à 16:01 -0700, Erast Benson a écrit :
Thanks for all replies.
In a private email you sent me, you said you were going to stop posting
on Debian mailing lists. This was just another lie.
Hmm, Debian
Martin Schulze wrote:
However, since one cannot run depmod properly without the respective
kernel being installed, removing the depmod call will caus harm.
Kernels already run depmod when installed, and module packages would
just need to be changed to call depmod with the right parameters to
Hi,
I think the core issue here is if we deem presenting purchased
identification at an event designed to extend the web of trust
acceptable behaviour.
I check photographs, name, age, and expiry dates on ID
presented. I did not include document verification in that checklist,
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 05:45:42PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Thursday 25 May 2006 15:26, Mike Hommey wrote:
I'm pretty sure we can find official IDs that look so lame that you'd think
it's a fake (the old french ones could be good example, and i know people
who still use that as an
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 09:52:48AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
and not showing any passports or showing passports:
[...]
- which did not had the *same* spelling as the name in the key (letter by
letter)
will not get a signature from me.
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 11:57:09AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 04:30:07PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On 25 May 2006, Andreas Tille spake thusly:
Is there any reason to revoke my signature I have put on
Martin's key after he showed me his passport?
On Thursday 25 May 2006 08:30, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Given time, one can pay more attention to each document (I require at least
two photo ID's issued by the government).
WTF? In Oregon, if you have a driver's license, you cannot get an ID card.
If you have an ID card, you have to
* Michael Meskes:
This may be a silly question but doesn't my signature only state that I
certify this key really belongs to the person it seems to belong to?
Exactly. It does not tell us anything about your views regarding that
person or the purpose of the key itself.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tyler MacDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: mod-bt
Version : 0.0.16
Upstream Author : Tyler MacDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.crackerjack.net/mod_bt/
* License : Apache 2.0
Programming Lang: C,
On 26 May 2006, Wouter Verhelst told this:
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 11:57:09AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
This may be a silly question but doesn't my signature only state
that I certify this key really belongs to the person it seems to
belong to?
That aside, personally, I don't know what
This one time, at band camp, Thomas Goirand said:
Hello!
Is there somebody in Shanghai from Debian able to check my ID and sign
my key? If there is none, is there somebody in Singapore, where I might
be able to go? I wouldn't be able to go in Hongkong (because of visa
problems) where I
On May 26, Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about using depmod -a instead, how much would it cost? AFAICS it
We already do.
Eh, typo, should have been depmod -A. I think this is a sufficiently
time-optimized version of depmod -a.
Yes, this is what the script uses.
--
ciao,
On May 26, Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, since one cannot run depmod properly without the respective
kernel being installed, removing the depmod call will caus harm.
Are you sure that this is still true? I believe that this has been fixed
a long time ago.
It should be
On 26 May 2006, Thiemo Seufer outgrape:
Keysigning isn't for judging behaviour but for confirming identity.
* Michael Meskes:
This may be a silly question but doesn't my signature only state
that I certify this key really belongs to the person it seems to
belong to?
Exactly. It does not
On Fri, 26 May 2006, David Moreno Garza wrote:
That's illegal actually. It is quite often to get your passport sealed
I have no idea about illegal (it might well be against some international
treaty, however), but it is very dangerous for you not to have your passport
stamped. There are very
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 05:45:42PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Thursday 25 May 2006 15:26, Mike Hommey wrote:
[snip]
[0] As long as he doesn't go and vote too, since the people in the voting
table
would
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What would you suggest instead?
Stop signing keys for Debian developers, since purchased ID's
are acceptable in this community? ;) At this point, I am not sure what
my stance is going to be.
What do you think we get by having the signed
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 25 May 2006, Goswin von Brederlow uttered the following:
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would say, off hand, that section 8.2 is for people who want
to provide a shared library for other packages, with a stable ABI,
and a
Hello Sir/Madam
Having recieved your email address iam happy to infrom
you that we are one of the embroiders,supplier and exporters of all kinds of
badges for that last 20 years.we have skilled pattern masters ,designers and
very skilled workers.you plz visit
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 10:07:00AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Only the dpkg:arch is required and that can be done with Provides:
dpkg-arch again.
Right. I wonder if even this should strictly be necessary, though, or if
dpkg shouldn't be able
On Friday 26 May 2006 07:06, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On 25 May 2006, Thomas Bushnell told this:
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Based on this, I strongly suggest that mere signatures on a new
maintainers key from a DD be also not enough, since people have now
effectively proven
Dear Debian-Developers All Over The World!
may i introduce my,
proposal for a more efficient download process
I. the reason why i suggest a patch-oriented download process
II. a brief description
II.A. on the
On 26 May 2006, Matt Zagrabelny spake thusly:
On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 16:16 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Cracking is not a scientific study.
cracking may not be, but determining the average number of people
who spot an unofficial id could be construed to be.
I can honestly state
* Henrique de Moraes Holschuh:
On Tue, 23 May 2006, Florian Weimer wrote:
I suppose it would be preferable to fix the stop target of the init
There is nothing preferable about it. Stop targets *are* to exit with
status 0 if the service is already stopped.
Makes sense. In this case, fixing
Luca Capello wrote:
As a side note, while my passport was valid (re-newed the day before
leaving for Mexico because I forgot it was expired after 5 years and
not 10), I didn't get any Mexican seal when I arrived at Mexico City
airport. As 2 others DDs with me (Aurelien Jarno and Matthias
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 25 May 2006 16:21:35 -0500
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ian Jackson wrote:
Kevin B. McCarty writes (Re: sending debian-private postings to
gmail):
Ian Jackson wrote:
[snip]
David Moreno Garza dijo [Fri, May 26, 2006 at 01:47:15PM -0500]:
As a side note, while my passport was valid (re-newed the day before
leaving for Mexico because I forgot it was expired after 5 years and
not 10), I didn't get any Mexican seal when I arrived at Mexico City
airport. As 2
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 01:47:15PM -0500, David Moreno Garza wrote:
That's illegal actually. It is quite often to get your passport sealed
while leaving your country but it is supposed to be mandatory to get the
seal in the country you are arriving, otherwise you could be thought
you are an
On Sat, 27 May 2006, Penny Leach wrote:
struck me as a little bit silly. Penny is clearly short for Penelope.
Only if you are reasonably well acquinted with the English language and
usual english names and nicknames.
Perhaps this was my bad when I made the key displayed a lack of foresight.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] dijo [Fri, May 26, 2006 at 10:34:50AM -0500]:
know who Martin Krafft is; I've seen him at a number of FOSDEM
instances, and I've seen him last year in Helsinki, where I called
him by his name (to which he reacted), and where literally hundreds
of others did the same.
On 5/27/06, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Only if you are reasonably well acquinted with the English language andusual english names and nicknames.This is true. One of the people at Debconf 5 I was thinking of, whose name I absolutely have no idea of anymore, was either a
Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 19:47:10 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Accepted openbabel 2.0.1-1 (source i386)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thursday 25 May 2006 08:30, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Given time, one can pay more attention to each document (I require at
least two photo ID's issued by the government).
WTF? In Oregon, if you have a driver's license, you cannot get an ID
card. If
David Moreno Garza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Luca Capello wrote:
As a side note, while my passport was valid (re-newed the day before
leaving for Mexico because I forgot it was expired after 5 years and
not 10), I didn't get any Mexican seal when I arrived at
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 07:15:53AM +1200, Penny Leach wrote:
On 5/26/06, Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While you're obviously free to set your own standards as to whose keys
you sign and not, I have come to the conclusion that the exact same
spelling requirement doesn't make that
Your message dated Sat, 08 Apr 2006 06:32:15 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Accepted tcm 2.20+TSQD-3 (source i386 all)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
1 - 100 of 197 matches
Mail list logo
