Re: [DRAFT] resolving DFSG violations

2008-10-23 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 20:24 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 05:52:28PM +, Manoj Srivastava wrote: This is the part I am not comfortable with. I do not think the delegates have the powers to decide when

Re: Include justification in tagging bugs ‘$FOO-ignore’

2008-10-23 Thread Filipus Klutiero
In other words, if a tag indicates a special case, that special case should be justified with a specific explanation. I would like to see such justification expected for every such tag, enforced by the convention that tags with *no* justification provided can be summarily removed by anyone.

Re: Bug Sprint - Oct 25 to Oct 30 - Register and eat cookies

2008-10-23 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 22/10/08 at 20:38 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: Pierre Habouzit wrote: On mar, oct 21, 2008 at 11:57:48 +, Josselin Mouette wrote: Le mardi 21 octobre 2008 à 08:53 -0300, David Bremner a écrit : So downgrading bugs to non-RC severity (with appropriate rationale) does not count

RC bugs in lenny, sorted by maintainer

2008-10-23 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, Here is a list of RC bugs in lenny, sorted by maintainer. If you want to reply to the list to comment on specific bugs, it's fine, but please Cc the bug reports so the information you provide is also available on the BTS. The list can also be found on

Check on DD

2008-10-23 Thread W. van den Akker
Hi, I am trying to get in contact with the DD who maintains the Scid package. From end of may until now he is non-responsive. I want to take over the maintainership of Scid and some other packages because there are new upstream versions available. Can somebody of you DD check if the maintainer of

Check on DD

2008-10-23 Thread W. van den Akker
Hi, I am trying to get in contact with the DD who maintains the Scid package. From end of may until now he is non-responsive. I want to take over the maintainership of Scid and some other packages because there are new upstream versions available. Can somebody of you DD check if the maintainer

Re: Check on DD

2008-10-23 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 3:42 PM, W. van den Akker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can somebody of you DD check if the maintainer of Scid has been active or is inactive. Last activity according to mia-query was October 2006. Besides that I have a non-responsive mia (at) qa.debian.org. Posted 3 mails

Re: RC bugs in lenny, sorted by maintainer

2008-10-23 Thread Michael Meskes
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 09:26:43AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: The list can also be found on http://udd.debian.net/cgi-bin/lenny_rc_ddlist.cgi (generated on the fly from UDD). [T] means affects only testing, [TU] means affects testing and unstable. Wouldn't it make sense to only send [TU]

Re: Bug#502959: general: raff.debian.org uses non-free software

2008-10-23 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 10:53:46PM +, Norbert Preining wrote: On Mi, 22 Okt 2008, Josselin Mouette wrote: In the end, all these discussions showed that many people here don't give a piss for the users. Many? I only see 2 or 3 of them around. Ok, many *loud* voices ... How

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged ???lenny-ignore????

2008-10-23 Thread Luca Capello
Hi there! On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:28:08 +0200, Manoj Srivastava wrote: On Tue, Oct 21 2008, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Manoj Srivastava wrote: acceleration, right? So the box can be installed, and is usable for non-gaming purposes. The drm stuff can possibly be

Re: Check on DD

2008-10-23 Thread Dmitry E. Oboukhov
On 09:42 Thu 23 Oct , W. van den Akker wrote: WvdA Hi, WvdA I am trying to get in contact with the DD who maintains the Scid package. WvdA From end of may until now he is non-responsive. WvdA I want to take over the maintainership of Scid and some other packages because WvdA there are new

Re: Check on DD

2008-10-23 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Dmitry E. Oboukhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for orphan this package :) You must have misread the part of the email where it was mentioned that [EMAIL PROTECTED] is itself MIA and doesn't reply. -- bye, pabs

Bug#503185: ITP: chname -- Utility which runs a command with a new system hostname

2008-10-23 Thread Mikhail Gusarov
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Mikhail Gusarov [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: chname Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : Michael Marineau * URL : http://code.google.com/p/chname/ * License : GNU General Public License v2 Programming Lang: C

Re: RC bugs in lenny, sorted by maintainer

2008-10-23 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 23/10/08 at 10:21 +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 09:26:43AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: The list can also be found on http://udd.debian.net/cgi-bin/lenny_rc_ddlist.cgi (generated on the fly from UDD). [T] means affects only testing, [TU] means affects testing

Re: RC bugs in lenny, sorted by maintainer

2008-10-23 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:40, Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No: in some cases, the maintainer forgot to send an unblock request to -release@, or the fix was inappropriate, and the bug will have to be fixed through a testing-proposed-updates upload. The release team isn't

Re: RC bugs in lenny, sorted by maintainer

2008-10-23 Thread Ana Guerrero
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 09:26:43AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Hi, Here is a list of RC bugs in lenny, sorted by maintainer. If you want to reply to the list to comment on specific bugs, it's fine, but please Cc the bug reports so the information you provide is also available on the BTS.

Re: RC bugs in lenny, sorted by maintainer

2008-10-23 Thread Michael Meskes
Wouldn't it make sense to only send [TU] bugs as these are the bugs we have to fix for the release? [T] normaly means fix just waiting for migration, isn't it? No: in some cases, the maintainer forgot to send an unblock request to -release@, or the fix was inappropriate, and the bug

Re: RC bugs in lenny, sorted by maintainer

2008-10-23 Thread Matthew Johnson
On Thu Oct 23 12:53, Sandro Tosi wrote: On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:40, Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No: in some cases, the maintainer forgot to send an unblock request to -release@, or the fix was inappropriate, and the bug will have to be fixed through a testing-proposed-updates

Re: Include justification in tagging bugs ‘$FOO -ignore’

2008-10-23 Thread Ben Finney
Filipus Klutiero [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In other words, if a tag indicates a special case, that special case should be justified with a specific explanation. I would like to see such justification expected for every such tag, enforced by the convention that tags with *no*

Inactive MIA team

2008-10-23 Thread Mohammed Adnène Trojette
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008, Paul Wise wrote: You must have misread the part of the email where it was mentioned that [EMAIL PROTECTED] is itself MIA and doesn't reply. MIA currently does reply but does not necessarily follows up with action (more than adding hints in the MIA database). However, I

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged ???lenny-ignore????

2008-10-23 Thread Robert Millan
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:23:50PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: On Tuesday 21 October 2008, you wrote: But, in fact, fixes are not welcome from the team. They have raised a major roadblock, allowing only one kind of fix which requires a lot of work, and rejecting anything simpler. Ever hear

Re: RC bugs in lenny, sorted by maintainer

2008-10-23 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Lucas Nussbaum [Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:40:03 +0200]: The release team isn't proactively tracking those AFAIK Except that we... are. Thank you very much. -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at

Re: [DRAFT] resolving DFSG violations

2008-10-23 Thread Robert Millan
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 08:36:24AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: Every kernel upload changing the ABI goes through NEW. Your lack of knowledge of Debian processes sucks (that means: you annoy us (at least me) with your stance and the fanatic way you defend it in public, please stop this

Re: Bug#503096: ITP: alpaca -- GnuPG file handling for Emacs

2008-10-23 Thread Tatsuya Kinoshita
Hi Luca, thanks for the comment. On October 22, 2008 at 7:18PM +0200, luca (at pca.it) wrote: * Package name: alpaca [...] * URL : http://www.mew.org/~kazu/proj/cipher/ I think that a package for one single file is too much. Even so, the Debian package is helpful for

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged ???lenny-ignore????

2008-10-23 Thread Neil McGovern
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 03:51:22PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:23:50PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: On Tuesday 21 October 2008, you wrote: But, in fact, fixes are not welcome from the team. They have raised a major roadblock, allowing only one kind of fix which

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged ???lenny-ignore????

2008-10-23 Thread Robert Millan
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 05:41:05PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote: On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 03:51:22PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:23:50PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: On Tuesday 21 October 2008, you wrote: But, in fact, fixes are not welcome from the team. They have

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged ???lenny-ignore????

2008-10-23 Thread Neil McGovern
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 07:06:14PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 05:41:05PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote: On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 03:51:22PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:23:50PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: On Tuesday 21 October 2008, you wrote:

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged ???lenny-ignore????

2008-10-23 Thread Thilo Six
Luca Capello wrote the following on 23.10.2008 10:53 - *snip* - That should be good enough to install, and then add non-free to sources.list and get the firmware required for the driver to work (absent a non-free debian installer that bundles non-free bits). This is no different

Re: [DRAFT] resolving DFSG violations

2008-10-23 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Wed, Oct 22 2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote: At some point, someone has to decide. Doing a vote for each is impractical. As our choice is _not_ silent, if someones (like usually the reporter who _sees_ such tags happen) disagree, he can raise a discussion. AFAICT it's what is happening

Re: [DRAFT] resolving DFSG violations

2008-10-23 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Thu, Oct 23 2008, martin f krafft wrote: It's all a matter of defining what your priorities are, which brings us back to the Social Contract, which says that these include: - 100% freeness - cater best to the interests of our users Frankly, this mindset infuriates me. It

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged ???lenny-ignore????

2008-10-23 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 18:13 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote: Perhaps I'm mis-reading the above. Which bit of the foundation documents do you think would need overriding for the tech-ctte to rule on which fix to take? One might think that this is the situation: two alternative fixes for the DFSG

Re: [DRAFT] resolving DFSG violations

2008-10-23 Thread Ean Schuessler
- Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Oct 23 2008, martin f krafft wrote: It's all a matter of defining what your priorities are, which brings us back to the Social Contract, which says that these include: - 100% freeness - cater best to the interests of our

Re: Re: Include justification in tagging bugs ‘$FOO-ignore’

2008-10-23 Thread Filipus Klutiero
Filipus Klutiero [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In other words, if a tag indicates a special case, that special case should be justified with a specific explanation. I would like to see such justification expected for every such tag, enforced by the convention that tags with *no*

Re: [DRAFT] resolving DFSG violations

2008-10-23 Thread Thilo Six
Manoj Srivastava wrote the following on 23.10.2008 19:06 - *snip* - Look, I am not proposing we have a GR for every upload. I am saying that non-free bits in main are a bug. A serious bug. A RC bug. It is a big fucking deal. It comes to the core of what Debian is. Now,

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged 'lenny-ignore'?

2008-10-23 Thread Vincent Danjean
Ben Hutchings wrote: On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 11:38 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: The iwl4965 firmware changed 2 times incompatible since the driver exists. That makes me wonder just how separate the driver and firmware are. If they are tightly coupled then the firmware may become subject to

Re: Bug Sprint - Oct 25 to Oct 30 - Register and eat cookies

2008-10-23 Thread Raphael Geissert
Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 22/10/08 at 20:38 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: If everything goes the way I want it to be, it won't be just lucas the one filing reports: I asked lucas if he could do the remove/purge test in lenny I'll do that. Thanks :) and the full install/remove/purge

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged 'lenny-ignore'?

2008-10-23 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 21:13 +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote: Ben Hutchings wrote: On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 11:38 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: The iwl4965 firmware changed 2 times incompatible since the driver exists. That makes me wonder just how separate the driver and firmware are. If

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged ???lenny-ignore????

2008-10-23 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 04:50:23PM -0500, William Pitcock wrote: In the kernel itself, yes. Provided that: * the kernel framework for loading firmware is used for drivers depending on non-free firmware, and * that firmware is available in non-free via firmware-nonfree What if the

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged 'lenny-ignore'?

2008-10-23 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 21:13 +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote: Firmware and driver do not run on the same CPU. There is no 'linkage' between them. With a client/server application, a GPL client does not enforce the server to be GPL, even if client and server are

RC bug for 10 packages

2008-10-23 Thread Francis Tyers
Hi, I'd like to open an RC bug for the following packages, following [1] I am asking the list. apertium-en-ca apertium-en-es apertium-eo-ca apertium-eo-es apertium-es-ca apertium-es-gl apertium-es-pt apertium-es-ro apertium-fr-ca apertium-fr-es apertium-oc-ca apertium-pt-gl apertium-oc-es There

Bug#503241: ITP: bti -- command line micro-blogging tool

2008-10-23 Thread gregor herrmann
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: gregor herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Package name: bti Version : 006 Upstream Author : Greg Kroah-Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL :

Re: RC bug for 10 packages

2008-10-23 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Francis Tyers [Thu, 23 Oct 2008 22:47:20 +0200]: Hi, Hello, Francis. The bug is that the language packages require a specific version of libpcre to function. Could you explain a bit the technical background for this? Do the data files in the language packages embed any data that is

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged 'lenny-ignore'?

2008-10-23 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 22:08 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: The FSF seems to disagree on this[1]: Can I release a non-free program that's designed to load a GPL-covered plug-in? It depends on how the program invokes its plug-ins. For instance, if the program uses only

Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged ???lenny-ignore????

2008-10-23 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 15:51 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 04:50:23PM -0500, William Pitcock wrote: In the kernel itself, yes. Provided that: * the kernel framework for loading firmware is used for drivers depending on non-free firmware, and * that firmware

web site

2008-10-23 Thread Lily Zey
Dear:Debian-devel We can see you have a good site but you could use a significant increase in targeted web traffic. We can review your site for free and show you how you can improve this portion of your online business right away. Email us now at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include your web site

web site

2008-10-23 Thread Lily Zey
Dear:Debian-devel If you're wondering why you're online business is not doing as well as you would like - the answer is web traffic. Basically - you need a lot more visibility. Email us today at [EMAIL PROTECTED] We will take a look at your site and give you an assessment free of charge.

Accepted nullmailer 1:1.04-1.1 (source i386)

2008-10-23 Thread Christian Perrier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 06:16:14 +0200 Source: nullmailer Binary: nullmailer Architecture: source i386 Version: 1:1.04-1.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Norbert Tretkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Christian Perrier

Accepted drbd8 2:8.2.6-4 (source all amd64)

2008-10-23 Thread Norbert Tretkowski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 08:51:09 +0200 Source: drbd8 Binary: drbd8-utils drbd8-source Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 2:8.2.6-4 Distribution: experimental Urgency: low Maintainer: Norbert Tretkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By:

Accepted fntsample 3.0-2 (source amd64)

2008-10-23 Thread Євгеній Мещеряков
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:46:20 +0200 Source: fntsample Binary: fntsample Architecture: source amd64 Version: 3.0-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Євгеній Мещеряков [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Євгеній Мещеряков [EMAIL

Accepted maatkit 2442-1 (source all)

2008-10-23 Thread Baron Schwartz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 17:40:40 -0400 Source: maatkit Binary: maatkit Architecture: source all Version: 2442-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Baron Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Baron Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted b2evolution 2.4.2-3 (source all)

2008-10-23 Thread Xavier Luthi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:39:58 +0200 Source: b2evolution Binary: b2evolution Architecture: source all Version: 2.4.2-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Xavier Luthi [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Xavier Luthi [EMAIL

Accepted toshutils 2.0.1+debian-21 (source amd64)

2008-10-23 Thread Giuseppe Iuculano
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:30:07 +0200 Source: toshutils Binary: toshutils Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2.0.1+debian-21 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Giuseppe Iuculano [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Giuseppe Iuculano

Accepted libbinio 1.4-12 (source amd64)

2008-10-23 Thread Bradley Smith
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:37:15 +0100 Source: libbinio Binary: libbinio1ldbl libbinio-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.4-12 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Bradley Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Bradley Smith

Accepted open-vm-tools 2008.10.10-123053-2 (source i386 all)

2008-10-23 Thread Daniel Baumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:32:00 +0200 Source: open-vm-tools Binary: open-vm-tools open-vm-toolbox open-vm-tools-dbg open-vm-source Architecture: source i386 all Version: 2008.10.10-123053-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium

Accepted ipmasq 4.0.8-7 (source all)

2008-10-23 Thread Daniel Baumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:03:00 +0200 Source: ipmasq Binary: ipmasq Architecture: source all Version: 4.0.8-7 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted ncurses 5.6+20081018-1 (source i386 all)

2008-10-23 Thread Daniel Baumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:28:00 +0200 Source: ncurses Binary: libncurses5 libncurses5-dev libncurses5-dbg libncursesw5 libncursesw5-dev libncursesw5-dbg lib64ncurses5 lib64ncurses5-dev lib32ncurses5 lib32ncurses5-dev lib32ncursesw5

Accepted pyopengl 3.0.0~b6-1 (source all)

2008-10-23 Thread Torsten Marek
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:01:58 +0200 Source: pyopengl Binary: python-opengl python-opengl-doc Architecture: source all Version: 3.0.0~b6-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Python Modules Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted rpm2html 1.9.6-1 (source amd64)

2008-10-23 Thread Michal Čihař
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:33:37 +0200 Source: rpm2html Binary: rpm2html Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.9.6-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Michal Čihař [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Michal Čihař [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted rpm2html 1.9.6-2 (source amd64)

2008-10-23 Thread Michal Čihař
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:53:25 +0200 Source: rpm2html Binary: rpm2html Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.9.6-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Michal Čihař [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Michal Čihař [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted texify 1.20 (source all)

2008-10-23 Thread Morten Hustveit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:12:40 +0200 Source: texify Binary: texify Architecture: source all Version: 1.20 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Morten Hustveit [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Morten Hustveit [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted telepathy-gabble 0.7.12-1 (source i386)

2008-10-23 Thread Simon McVittie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:02:28 +0100 Source: telepathy-gabble Binary: telepathy-gabble telepathy-gabble-dbg Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.7.12-1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Telepathy maintainers

Accepted refit 0.11-5 (source amd64)

2008-10-23 Thread Julien BLACHE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:54:51 +0200 Source: refit Binary: refit gptsync Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.11-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Julien BLACHE [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Julien BLACHE [EMAIL

Accepted jsjac 1.3.1-2 (source all)

2008-10-23 Thread metal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:15:22 -0200 Source: jsjac Binary: libjs-jac Architecture: source all Version: 1.3.1-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian XMPP Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Marcelo Jorge Vieira

Accepted refit 0.12-1 (source amd64)

2008-10-23 Thread Julien BLACHE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:50:55 +0200 Source: refit Binary: refit gptsync Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.12-1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: low Maintainer: Julien BLACHE [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Julien BLACHE [EMAIL

Accepted scratchbox2 1.99.0.27-1 (source i386)

2008-10-23 Thread Riku Voipio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:23:05 +0300 Source: scratchbox2 Binary: scratchbox2 Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.99.0.27-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Riku Voipio [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Riku Voipio [EMAIL

Accepted sntop 1.4.3-4 (source amd64)

2008-10-23 Thread Fredrik Steen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 22:58:55 +0200 Source: sntop Binary: sntop Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.4.3-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Fredrik Steen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Fredrik Steen [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted lire 2:2.0.3-1.1 (source all)

2008-10-23 Thread Christian Perrier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 05:58:08 +0200 Source: lire Binary: lire lire-doc lire-devel-doc Architecture: source all Version: 2:2.0.3-1.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Wolfgang Sourdeau [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Christian

Accepted ecryptfs-utils 61-1 (source i386)

2008-10-23 Thread Daniel Baumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:42:00 +0200 Source: ecryptfs-utils Binary: ecryptfs-utils libecryptfs0 libecryptfs-dev Architecture: source i386 Version: 61-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted libgsf 1.14.10-3 (source all amd64)

2008-10-23 Thread J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:55:22 +0200 Source: libgsf Binary: libgsf-gnome-1-dev libgsf-gnome-1-114-dbg libgsf-gnome-1-114 libgsf-1-114-dbg libgsf-1-dev libgsf-1-114 libgsf-1-common libgsf-bin Architecture: source all amd64 Version:

Accepted ocamlmakefile 6.28.2-1 (source all)

2008-10-23 Thread Ralf Treinen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 20:11:27 +0200 Source: ocamlmakefile Binary: ocamlmakefile Architecture: source all Version: 6.28.2-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Ralf

Accepted otrs2 2.3.2-2 (source all)

2008-10-23 Thread Torsten Werner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 06:49:37 +0200 Source: otrs2 Binary: otrs2 Architecture: source all Version: 2.3.2-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Torsten Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Torsten Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted mysql-dfsg-5.0 5.0.51a-16 (source all amd64)

2008-10-23 Thread Norbert Tretkowski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 08:50:43 +0200 Source: mysql-dfsg-5.0 Binary: libmysqlclient15off libmysqlclient15-dev mysql-common mysql-client-5.0 mysql-server-5.0 mysql-server mysql-client Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 5.0.51a-16

Accepted sbox-dtc 1.11-5 (source i386)

2008-10-23 Thread Thomas Goirand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 04:52:30 +0800 Source: sbox-dtc Binary: sbox-dtc Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.11-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Thomas Goirand [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Thomas Goirand [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted antlr3 3.0.1+dfsg-4 (source all i386)

2008-10-23 Thread Matthias Klose
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 01:32:35 +0200 Source: antlr3 Binary: antlr3 antlr3-gcj Architecture: source all i386 Version: 3.0.1+dfsg-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By:

Accepted dtc 0.29.14-1 (source all)

2008-10-23 Thread Thomas Goirand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 12:21:49 +0800 Source: dtc Binary: dtc-common dtc-core dtc-cyrus dtc-postfix-courier dtc-stats-daemon dtc-toaster Architecture: source all Version: 0.29.14-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Thomas

Accepted dtc-xen 0.3.24-1 (source all)

2008-10-23 Thread Thomas Goirand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:26:08 +0800 Source: dtc-xen Binary: dtc-xen dtc-xen-firewall Architecture: source all Version: 0.3.24-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Thomas Goirand [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Thomas Goirand

Accepted smc 1.6-1 (source all i386)

2008-10-23 Thread Muammar El Khatib
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 00:31:35 -0430 Source: smc Binary: smc smc-data smc-music Architecture: source all i386 Version: 1.6-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Muammar El Khatib [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Muammar El Khatib

Accepted desktop-base 5.0.2 (source all)

2008-10-23 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:23:57 +0200 Source: desktop-base Binary: desktop-base Architecture: source all Version: 5.0.2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Yves-Alexis Perez [EMAIL

Accepted zshdb 0.01git+20081021-1 (source all)

2008-10-23 Thread Clint Adams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 17:10:58 -0400 Source: zshdb Binary: zshdb Architecture: source all Version: 0.01git+20081021-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted ecryptfs-utils 63-1 (source i386)

2008-10-23 Thread Daniel Baumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 06:42:00 +0200 Source: ecryptfs-utils Binary: ecryptfs-utils libecryptfs0 libecryptfs-dev Architecture: source i386 Version: 63-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]