Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Joop Stakenborg pa3...@debian.org
* Package name: xdemorse
Version : 1.3
Upstream Author : Neoklis Kyriazis neoklis.kyria...@gmail.com
* URL : http://5b4az.chronos.org.uk/pages/morse.html
* License : GPL
Programming
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com
* Package name: dicom3tools
Version : 1.0.20081122
Upstream Author : David A. Clunie dclu...@dclunie.com
* URL : http://www.dclunie.com/dicom3tools/workinprogress/
* License
On mar, 2008-12-16 at 13:57 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Description : Tools for handling DICOM files, with conversion
from proprietary formats.
Unix, Mac and Windows (Cygwin) command line utilities for creating,
modifying, dumping and validating files of DICOM attributes, and
Christian Perrier wrote:
(…)
So, I had another idea: open foo-backports at the moment foo is
frozen so that maintainers can upload the latest bleeding edge
versions of their packages there, when using experimental is not
possible for some reasons.
And make backports an official service of
* Russ Allbery [Mon, 15 Dec 2008 11:09:45 -0800]:
Thomas Weber thomas.weber.m...@gmail.com writes:
Am Montag, den 15.12.2008, 10:06 + schrieb Steve McIntyre:
I've been talking with Manoj already, in private to try and avoid
flaming. I specifically asked him to delay this vote until
Le Tuesday 16 December 2008 16:50:52 Adeodato Simó, vous avez écrit :
Where did Steve shorten the discussion period? He did so for the *other*
vote, but I haven't seen a thread where he did for this one. (I may have
just missed it.)
Le Tuesday 16 December 2008 16:52:55 Romain Beauxis, vous avez écrit :
http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2008/11/msg00046.html, no?
I don't read shorten in this link, only start.
Woops, sorry I misread discussion with vote.
The problem with this quote is that it was used to justify the
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:52:53PM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
Didier Raboud schrieb:
?
Something like that, I don't really care about the name. The important
thing is, that unstable is never frozen, but temporarily disconnected
from the unstable testing stable flow.
Another way to
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 08:58:40AM -0600, John Goerzen jgoer...@complete.org
wrote:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:52:53PM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
Didier Raboud schrieb:
?
Something like that, I don't really care about the name. The important
thing is, that unstable is never
Hi,
On Dienstag, 16. Dezember 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
I agree. It's clear that most people don't work on RC bugs instead of
working on their packages: during freezes, they just stop working on
Debian, since it's judged socially incorrect to work on one's packages
in unstable or
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 05:13:59PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
That some people are not interested in making the release happen, is a real
problem IMO. We shouldnt encourage such behaviour ;-)
Then why are you posting to mailing lists instead of releasing lenny?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 2008-12-16 15:58 +0100, John Goerzen wrote:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:52:53PM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
Another way to see it is that unstable is constantly flowing and we're
just forking a stable distribution from it from time to time.
That sounds like ubuntu. But speaking of them,
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 02:21:09PM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
I think this question is nonsense. While the bug-fix rate was more or
less the same since the last two releases,
What was the bug-fix rate for the last two releases? I thought that the
bug fix rate for etch was faster than the
Hi,
Bastian Venthur wrote:
Holger Levsen schrieb:
Hi,
On Montag, 15. Dezember 2008, Bastian Venthur wrote:
Something like that, I don't really care about the name. The important
thing is, that unstable is never frozen, but temporarily disconnected
from the unstable testing stable
On 16/12/08 at 14:21 +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
I think this question is nonsense. While the bug-fix rate was more or
less the same since the last two releases, it looks like in this release
we actually started the freeze with much more RC-bugs than before. So it
was foreseeable that the
Hi
Dne Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:41:17 +0100
Maximilian Gaß m...@cloudconnected.org napsal(a):
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Maximilian Gaß m...@cloudconnected.org
* Package name: lighty-stats
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Daniel Friesel d...@derf.homelinux.org
*
Holger Levsen schrieb:
Hi,
On Montag, 15. Dezember 2008, Bastian Venthur wrote:
Something like that, I don't really care about the name. The important
thing is, that unstable is never frozen, but temporarily disconnected
from the unstable testing stable flow.
That's the way it is.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Maximilian Gaß m...@cloudconnected.org
* Package name: lighty-stats
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Daniel Friesel d...@derf.homelinux.org
* URL : https://derf.homelinux.org/~derf/lighty-stats
* License : ISC
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 04:52:55PM +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote:
Le Tuesday 16 December 2008 16:50:52 Adeodato Simó, vous avez écrit :
Where did Steve shorten the discussion period? He did so for the *other*
vote, but I haven't seen a thread where he did for this one. (I may have
just
On 16/12/08 at 09:46 -0500, Mike O'Connor wrote:
What new graphics cards are supported by xorg 7.4 that arean't already
supported by unstable? the intel, ati, radio, nv drivers don't support
any newer cards afaict.
Intel GM45 (found in laptops shipped since ~ september 2008) is
unsupported
On 16/12/08 at 14:34 +, Neil McGovern wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 03:07:12PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 16/12/08 at 14:21 +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
I think this question is nonsense. While the bug-fix rate was more or
less the same since the last two releases, it looks
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez cor...@debian.org wrote:
On mar, 2008-12-16 at 13:57 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Description : Tools for handling DICOM files, with conversion
from proprietary formats.
Unix, Mac and Windows (Cygwin) command line utilities for
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 03:07:12PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 16/12/08 at 14:21 +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
I think this question is nonsense. While the bug-fix rate was more or
less the same since the last two releases, it looks like in this release
we actually started the freeze
Hi!
Bastian Venthur schrieb:
Another way to see it is that unstable is constantly flowing and
we're just forking a stable distribution from it from time to time.
Sounds like what was done before testing was introduced, which worked even
less, with even longer freeze periods, where you couldn't
Quoting Bastian Venthur (vent...@debian.org):
Is that important? Unstable is frozen for nearly 1/2 year now, that's a
problem we should try to solve if we don't want to degrade ourselves to
a server-only distribution.
While I don't see such a big issues in this, there is maybe room for
Hi,
Bastian Venthur wrote:
What I'd like to see is a solution where unstable is *never* frozen,
maybe by replacing the current frozen unstable with something temporary
and putting it between unstable and testing, where all the fixes go
while all the new stuff can still go into unstable but
2008/12/16 Bastian Venthur vent...@debian.org:
I actually made a suggestion how to avoid a freeze in unstable, since
looking at the length of the freeze times of the last two releases and
the current one it seems that this model doesn't scale very well.
I share your concerns and I support
Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Hi,
Bastian Venthur wrote:
What I'd like to see is a solution where unstable is *never* frozen
Bastian, this is a brilliant idea!! Debian needs those excellent people
like you who have splendid ideas and all ready to implement them!!! You
are the most valuable
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 06:48:08PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Bastian, this is a brilliant idea!! Debian needs those excellent people like
you who have splendid ideas and all ready to implement them!!! You are the
most valuable person in Debian right now! Because you contribute a
2008/12/16 Thomas Viehmann t...@beamnet.de:
Hi,
Bastian Venthur wrote:
What I'd like to see is a solution where unstable is *never* frozen,
maybe by replacing the current frozen unstable with something temporary
and putting it between unstable and testing, where all the fixes go
while all
On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 13:38 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Montag, 15. Dezember 2008, Bastian Venthur wrote:
Something like that, I don't really care about the name. The important
thing is, that unstable is never frozen, but temporarily disconnected
from the unstable testing stable
Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
Didier Raboud wrote:
Yes. But there is a bunch of non-DD people that strongly want to use
Debian and prefer the recent software over the stabilized one.
These are called 'users of unstable' or 'users of testing'.
Fair enough.
On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 18:07 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 16/12/08 at 14:34 +, Neil McGovern wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 03:07:12PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 16/12/08 at 14:21 +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
I think this question is nonsense. While the bug-fix rate was more
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 02:14:29PM +0100, Michael Hanke wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 02:06:40PM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On mar, 2008-12-16 at 13:57 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Description : Tools for handling DICOM files, with conversion
from proprietary formats.
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net (16/12/2008):
Number of distinct posters per month on debian-bugs...@lists.d.o:
[ figures ]
So, the number of people working on RC bugs has significantly
decreased since the beginning of the freeze.
The less RC bugs, the less people working on it. Nice
Romain Beauxis wrote:
Honnestly, this discussion takes place at every freeze.
As many others: firmware, dfsg-freeness, … ;)
First of all, you probably should propose such thing *after* the release,
not now.
Secondly, I'm still wondering what new arguments were brought here. For
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:16:05PM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
I support that request. Not only is unstable quite outdated already
(bleeding edge?) it also becomes more and more a problem since the
kernel and Xorg aren't updated anymore in unstable. That means that
newer hardware
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 11:13:41AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Adeodato Simó d...@net.com.org.es writes:
What does §4.1.7 mean, then? Can't it be read to mean that the DPL may
appoint a new Secretary not at end of term, if there's disagreement
between them?
I believe this only applies
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Didier Raboud wrote:
Romain Beauxis wrote:
You can't get both recent *and* stabilized software. For a solid release
to be done, one needs to hold new improvements for a while.
Yes. But there is a bunch of non-DD people that strongly want to use
Hi,
On Montag, 15. Dezember 2008, Bastian Venthur wrote:
Something like that, I don't really care about the name. The important
thing is, that unstable is never frozen, but temporarily disconnected
from the unstable testing stable flow.
That's the way it is.
Have you fixed an RC bug today
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 02:06:40PM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On mar, 2008-12-16 at 13:57 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Description : Tools for handling DICOM files, with conversion
from proprietary formats.
Unix, Mac and Windows (Cygwin) command line utilities for
On 16/12/08 at 19:15 +0100, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 18:07 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
clear that most people don't work on RC bugs instead of working on their
packages: I don't have any data on that, it's mostly based on
perception. Let's try to gather data on something
Le Tuesday 16 December 2008 14:55:29 Didier Raboud, vous avez écrit :
I think that the three existing flavours of debian already provide more
than is needed to offer comfort for both users with stability needs and
users with desire for new software.
Actually, I would agree if you consider
On mar, 2008-12-16 at 14:12 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Those are extremely well know file format in the medical imaging
world. Next time you go get an MRI / CT, ask for your DICOM CD with
your images (in most countries, you do not get films anymore).
It may be worth adding “medical
Adeodato Simó d...@net.com.org.es writes:
* Russ Allbery [Mon, 15 Dec 2008 11:09:45 -0800]:
Where did Steve shorten the discussion period? He did so for the
*other* vote, but I haven't seen a thread where he did for this one.
(I may have just missed it.)
Miriam Ruiz wrote:
I don't think this kind of attitude helps anyone. Harassing people for
having ideas different than yours will only make people to stop
sharing them. We should seriously reconsider what kind of Debian we
want. Seriously.
Yeah, my post was more than inappropriate.
But while
Le Tuesday 16 December 2008 20:30:22 Thomas Viehmann, vous avez écrit :
But while you bring it up: I want a Debian where every Developer can
cough up a minimal commitment to help with releasing. That is what Have
you fixed an RC bug today is about?. If all developers had fixed one RC
bug in
Alexander wrote:
Hi!
Bastian Venthur schrieb:
Another way to see it is that unstable is constantly flowing and
we're just forking a stable distribution from it from time to time.
Sounds like what was done before testing was introduced, which worked even
less, with even longer freeze periods,
Bastian Venthur wrote:
Holger Levsen schrieb:
I find it very strange to see people complaining about the long freeze,
instead of working on making it shorter.
I actually made a suggestion how to avoid a freeze in unstable, since
looking at the length of the freeze times of the last two
Steve McIntyre schrieb:
Alexander wrote:
Hi!
Bastian Venthur schrieb:
Another way to see it is that unstable is constantly flowing and
we're just forking a stable distribution from it from time to time.
Sounds like what was done before testing was introduced, which worked even
less, with
Romain Beauxis wrote:
I think you completely forgot about the fact that this project is run by
people who aren't payed for that.
And, yes I didn't fix any RC bug today, nor yesterday. I even have now 3 on
mediawiki for which I won't be able to take much time.
How about once per year?
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 08:30:22PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
But while you bring it up: I want a Debian where every Developer can cough up
a minimal commitment to help with releasing. That is what Have you fixed an
RC bug today is about?. If all developers had fixed one RC bug in the months
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 09:34:39PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Romain Beauxis wrote:
I think you completely forgot about the fact that this project is run by
people who aren't payed for that.
And, yes I didn't fix any RC bug today, nor yesterday. I even have now 3 on
mediawiki for
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:29:21AM +0100, Didier Raboud wrote:
Look for example at the upcoming KDE4.2 : KDE4.0 (public beta) went out in
january 2008. Since then and 'because' of the unstable-to-testing pipe,
KDE4.0 has only lived in experimental with the big fat blinking
red WARNING sign
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 09:27:55PM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
Actually, I don't know since I'm not long enough involved to know what
happened back then.
It's called research.
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 10:17:13PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 09:27:55PM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
Actually, I don't know since I'm not long enough involved to know what
happened back then.
It's called research.
It's called manners.
--
Noah Slater,
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 09:27:55PM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
Steve McIntyre schrieb:
I'm curious about that myself. We've tried that in the past, and a
3-year release cycle was what happened. Experience tells us that we
have much too big a system to suddenly one day declare release
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:55:40 -0500
Kevin Mark kevin.m...@verizon.net wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 09:34:39PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Romain Beauxis wrote:
I think you completely forgot about the fact that this project is
run by people who aren't payed for that.
And, yes I
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:41:58 +
Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 10:17:13PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 09:27:55PM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
Actually, I don't know since I'm not long enough involved to know
what happened back
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 09:57:15PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:41:58 +
Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 10:17:13PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 09:27:55PM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
Actually, I don't
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 09:27:55PM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
What I see *now* is that the freezes during the last two and the current
release are getting longer and longer (~1,5 months, ~4 months and for
Lenny at least 5 months). For me this seems to be a serious problem we
should not
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 09:46:41PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
Of course, these problems would all also apply to a frozen distribution
like we used to have. My recollection of those times is that the long
freezes we had back then had pretty similar effects on general
development - the win from
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:58:52 +
Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 09:53:58PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
I get criticised for being rude or direct - well here's the news: I
don't care if people think I'm rude, deal with it. At least I do
what I can to fix
Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org wrote:
Hi,
suit. This inevitably causes a chain reaction of rudeness and flames. As a
community, we would do well to be a little more tolerant of others, and that
includes their mistakes.
And that includes cutting some slack to people when they vent off, as
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 03:55:40PM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 09:34:39PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Romain Beauxis wrote:
I think you completely forgot about the fact that this project is run by
people who aren't payed for that.
And, yes I didn't fix any RC
Jan Hauke Rahm i...@jhr-online.de wrote:
Hi,
Reading this (and following the idea of not introducing new stuff or
archives but releasing faster) it sounds as simple as testing needs
to be more strict and rigorous in accepting packages to be *indeed*
always in a seriously better shape than
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 06:07:25PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
clear that most people don't work on RC bugs instead of working on their
packages: I don't have any data on that, it's mostly based on
perception. Let's try to gather data on something relevant:
Number of distinct posters per
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 09:53:58PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
I get criticised for being rude or direct - well here's the news: I don't care
if people think I'm rude, deal with it. At least I do what I can to fix stuff,
I apologise when I do make mistakes and I do not recommend something I
On Tuesday 16 December 2008 10:06, Romain Beauxis to...@rastageeks.org
wrote:
Is that important? Unstable is frozen for nearly 1/2 year now, that's a
problem we should try to solve if we don't want to degrade ourselves to
a server-only distribution.
You can't get both recent *and*
On Tuesday 16 December 2008 23:38, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org
wrote:
I find it very strange to see people complaining about the long freeze,
instead of working on making it shorter.
If we decouple the freeze from development in unstable, the result will
that less people will be
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:22:29PM +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote:
Being stricter wrt testing migration is hardly going to help. What
will help is having more people actually use unstable so bugs are
uncovered before they hit testing.
Sounds reasonable... so, we have to encourage (competent) users
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Parent math.par...@gmail.com
* Package name: php-kolab-filter
Version : 0.1.3
Upstream Authors :
* Gunnar Wrobel (Lead)
* jarosch (Lead)
* chuck (Lead)
* Jan Schneider (Lead)
* URL :
Ana Guerrero wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:29:21AM +0100, Didier Raboud wrote:
Look for example at the upcoming KDE4.2 : KDE4.0 (public beta) went out
in january 2008. Since then and 'because' of the unstable-to-testing
pipe, KDE4.0 has only lived in experimental with the big fat
2008/12/17 Luca Niccoli lultimou...@gmail.com:
But I use XFS, which seems to have some problems with d_type [1]
I'm not really sure this is the source of the problem, but I thought
it was worth giving a try...
A second after posting I thought I could try mounting ~/.ssh on tmpfs
for a test,
2008/12/16 Luca Niccoli lultimou...@gmail.com:
I can't really see what I'm doing wrong...
Maybe I have a clue:
++file_filter(const struct dirent *dir)
++{
++ return (DT_REG == (DT_REG dir-d_type)) ||
++ (DT_LNK == (DT_LNK dir-d_type)) ;
++}
But I use XFS, which seems to
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 09:31:13AM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
On Tuesday 16 December 2008 10:06, Romain Beauxis to...@rastageeks.org
wrote:
Is that important? Unstable is frozen for nearly 1/2 year now, that's a
problem we should try to solve if we don't want to degrade ourselves to
a
Luca wrote:
2008/12/16 Luca Niccoli lultimou...@gmail.com:
I can't really see what I'm doing wrong...
Maybe I have a clue:
++file_filter(const struct dirent *dir)
++{
++ return (DT_REG == (DT_REG dir-d_type)) ||
++ (DT_LNK == (DT_LNK dir-d_type)) ;
++}
But I use XFS, which
Le mardi 16 décembre 2008 à 23:55 +, Tzafrir Cohen a écrit :
Fedora: a somewhat equivalent of Debian Testing. The rules for updating
a package even after a version is released are way more laxed than
Debian Stable.
For what I’ve seen, Fedora rawhide is more similar to Debian
experimental
Le mardi 16 décembre 2008 à 23:22 +0100, Julien BLACHE a écrit :
Also new users have a tendency to go with testing and don't use
unstable much these days.
The net effect is that there aren't enough people left using unstable
to uncover enough problems. Hence bugs silently make it to testing.
Romain Beauxis to...@rastageeks.org (16/12/2008):
I think you completely forgot about the fact that this project is run
by people who aren't payed for that.
They aren't paid for repeatedly ranting about the fact we have not
released yet, either. Which is something Bastian does, and which is
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 01:17:33AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mardi 16 décembre 2008 à 23:55 +, Tzafrir Cohen a écrit :
Fedora: a somewhat equivalent of Debian Testing. The rules for updating
a package even after a version is released are way more laxed than
Debian Stable.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org wrote:
Le mardi 16 décembre 2008 à 23:22 +0100, Julien BLACHE a écrit :
Also new users have a tendency to go with testing and don't use
unstable much these days.
The net effect is that there aren't enough people left using
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 12:57 AM, Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com wrote:
Luca wrote:
2008/12/16 Luca Niccoli lultimou...@gmail.com:
I can't really see what I'm doing wrong...
Maybe I have a clue:
++file_filter(const struct dirent *dir)
++{
++ return (DT_REG == (DT_REG dir-d_type)) ||
++
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 2:11 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES
roucaries.bast...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 12:57 AM, Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com wrote:
Luca wrote:
2008/12/16 Luca Niccoli lultimou...@gmail.com:
I can't really see what I'm doing wrong...
Maybe I have a clue:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008, Ben Finney wrote:
Romain Beauxis to...@rastageeks.org writes:
Unfortunately you forgot to also mention this bug for instance:
http://bugs.debian.org/494120
Which has been prematurely archived on 2008-08-15 while in
mid-discussion, by one party in that discussion.
The other way round works, too: Removing people who don't have that
minimal commitment from the project and their packages from the archive
would also allow us to release (a lot less) in a timely fashion.
Right... And it would also help releasing timely to remove all buggy
packages.
--
That works both ways - those who do contribute and help Debian across a
wide range of areas should be valued and supported, even if they show
that frustration from time to time. Everyone makes mistakes but why
must the most active contributors be the first target of criticism when
they criticise
The single largest factor in making the atmosphere unpleasant is people who
aren't contributing to Debian running their mouths on our development lists.
I disagree, though I know relatively well how much people contribute.
I'd rather blame the mailing lists if simple enthusiasts caused too
Don Armstrong d...@debian.org writes:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008, Ben Finney wrote:
Romain Beauxis to...@rastageeks.org writes:
http://bugs.debian.org/494120
Which has been prematurely archived on 2008-08-15 while in
mid-discussion, by one party in that discussion.
Uh... it was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:24:27 +1300
Source: moodle
Binary: moodle
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.8.2.dfsg-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Moodle Packaging Team moodle-packag...@catalyst.net.nz
Changed-By: Francois
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 06:50:06 +0100
Source: network-manager-applet
Binary: network-manager-gnome
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.7.0-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Utopia Maintenance Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 06:17:55 -0600
Source: gsl
Binary: libgsl0ldbl libgsl0-dev gsl-bin libgsl0-dbg libgsl0-prof
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.12+dfsg-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dirk Eddelbuettel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 20:20:44 +0100
Source: python-soappy
Binary: python-soappy
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.12.0-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Python Modules Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:22:47 +0100
Source: ftp.app
Binary: ftp.app
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Gürkan Sengün gur...@phys.ethz.ch
Changed-By: Gürkan Sengün
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:01:44 +0100
Source: initramfs-tools
Binary: initramfs-tools
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.92m
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian kernel team debian-ker...@lists.debian.org
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:42:38 +0200
Source: libmodule-corelist-perl
Binary: libmodule-corelist-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.15-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Perl Group
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:08:00 +0100
Source: openerp-server
Binary: openerp-server
Architecture: source all
Version: 5.0.0~rc1.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Daniel Baumann dan...@debian.org
Changed-By: Daniel Baumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:19:00 +0100
Source: openerp-client
Binary: openerp-client
Architecture: source all
Version: 5.0.0~rc1.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Daniel Baumann dan...@debian.org
Changed-By: Daniel Baumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:51:00 +0100
Source: openerp-server
Binary: openerp-server
Architecture: source all
Version: 5.0.0~rc1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Daniel Baumann dan...@debian.org
Changed-By: Daniel Baumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:47:17 +0100
Source: xcb-util
Binary: libxcb-atom1 libxcb-atom1-dev libxcb-aux0 libxcb-aux0-dev libxcb-event1
libxcb-event1-dev libxcb-image0 libxcb-image0-dev libxcb-keysyms0
libxcb-keysyms0-dev libxcb-property1
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
