On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 07:24:15PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
Hello,
I have not attended the "Hijacking packages for fun and profit" BoF at DebConf,
but I would like to share some thoughts on what I read in Steve McIntyre's
report.
It's a good title, that draws attention. :-)
>
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 02:12:41AM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> tools POV). The one _good_ reason for using the aarch64 name is avoiding
> accidental matches with arm* in various bits of configery so leaving
> that alone probably makes sense despite the silly name.
How much of the arm* silliness is the
Hi Steve,
Thanks for the summary of the EFI BoF. If you don't mind, I'm going to
piggy-back on this to provide a bit more info about Secure Boot. Some of
this is just expanding on your notes with clarifications; other bits are new
information I've gleaned while attending the UEFI Summer Summit t
On Sat, 21 Jul 2012, Wookey wrote:
> Arm64 everywhere would have been neater but unless someone is
> volunteering for a massive argument and changing upstream gcc and
No way. it is difficult to do better at this kind of thing than Linus, and
he has already said his piece :-p It won't be aarch64
+++ Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton [2012-07-20 21:27 +0100]:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> > As I've posted during DebConf(*), Maybe OpenBlocks can solve this problem.
> > It has 2GB RAM, reliable production use and we can buy it NOW.
> >
> > *) http://lists.debian.o
+++ Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [2012-07-20 16:55 -0300]:
> On Fri, 20 Jul 2012, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > Naming
> > ==
> >
> > Naming issues: ARM are calling the new 64-bit architecture
> > AArch64. Other people don't like that and various other names have
> > been proposed for use elsewhere
Hi,
I have a spec sheet to devices for English.
I ask whether this can be distributed.
Please wait.
Nobuhiro
2012/7/21 Dr. David Alan Gilbert :
> * Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton (l...@lkcl.net) wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Hideki Yamane wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Thu, 19 Jul 20
Hello,
directing this mail to -dpkg@, which hopefully makes sense.
Steve McIntyre (21/07/2012):
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 09:01:21PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> >Hi!
> >
> >On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 17:19:40 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >> CD sizing problems
> >> ==
> >
> >> Ther
* Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton (l...@lkcl.net) wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 18:35:44 +0100
> > Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >> buildds
> >> ===
> >>
> >> Both armel and armhf are doing well, covering ~96% of the archive. We
> >
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 09:01:21PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
>Hi!
>
>On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 17:19:40 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> CD sizing problems
>> ==
>
>> There has been much discussion about switching packages over to using
>> xz compression instead of gzip by default, inc
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 03:01:37PM -0600, Paul Wise wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
>> Here's a summary of what we discussed in the debian-cd BoF [1] last
>> week (9th July). Thanks to the awesome efforts of the DebConf video
>> team, the video of the session is a
[ Please note the cross-post and Reply-To ]
Hi folks,
Here's a summary of what we discussed in the EFI BoF [1] last week
(9th July). Thanks to the awesome efforts of the DebConf video team,
the video of the session is already online [2] in case you missed
it. I've also attached the Gobby notes th
Dear debian-devel,
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 07:24:15PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Here's a summary of what we discussed in the BoF [1] last week (12th
> July). Thanks to the awesome efforts of the DebConf video team, the
> video of the session is already online [2] in case you missed it. I've
>
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 18:35:44 +0100
> Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> buildds
>> ===
>>
>> Both armel and armhf are doing well, covering ~96% of the archive. We
>> don't have any ARM server hardware yet, so we're stuck using
>> developm
On Fri, 20 Jul 2012, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Naming
> ==
>
> Naming issues: ARM are calling the new 64-bit architecture
> AArch64. Other people don't like that and various other names have
> been proposed for use elsewhere. Debian/Ubuntu developers have already
> picked the name "arm64" in dpk
Hi folks,
Here's a summary of what we discussed in the BoF [1] last week (12th
July). Thanks to the awesome efforts of the DebConf video team, the
video of the session is already online [2] in case you missed it. I've
also attached the Gobby notes that were taken during the session. I'd
like to ex
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sylvestre Ledru
* Package name: libc++
Version : 1.0~svn160132
Upstream Author : Many people (and no, not only Apple)
* URL : http://libcxx.llvm.org, http://libcxxabi.llvm.org
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C++
Des
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Moeller
* Package name: python-biom
Version : 1.0.0
* URL : http://biom-format.org/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Description : observation contingency tables for biological sampleS
The B
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 02:01:04PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
...
>
> i18n/l10n: Moin is not great at supporting these for page content. We
> have proposed solutions to make this better:
>
> Proposal #1 http://wiki.debian.org/DebianWiki/I18n
>
> Proposal #2 http://wiki.debian.org/De
[ Please note the cross-post and Reply-To ]
Hi folks,
Here's a summary of what we discussed in the AArch64 port planning BoF
[1] last week (10th July). Thanks to the awesome efforts of the
DebConf video team, the video of the session is already online [2] in
case you missed it. I've also attached
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 02:01:04PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>[ Please note the cross-post and Reply-To ]
>
> Anti-spam
> -
> Much of the work we've done has been to deal with the ever-present
> spam problem. The main thrust of that is to stop drive-by spammers
> by making it harder
[ Please note the cross-post and Reply-To ]
Hi folks,
Here's a summary of what we discussed in the debian wiki BoF [1] last
week (13th July). Thanks to the awesome efforts of the DebConf video
team, the video of the session is already online [2] in case you
missed it. I've also attached the Gobby
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Moeller
* Package name: trimmomatic
Version : 0.22
* URL : http://www.usadellab.org/cms/index.php?page=trimmomatic
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: Java
Description : flexible read trimming tool for Illu
I agree with Josselin here. There is no point in forking gconf and other
libraries. Even worse, this will increase the incompatibility between
different desktops. For example, an app making use of "gconftool-2" will
not work when there's "mateconftool-2" in the system instead.
If you want to fix a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ole Streicher
* Package name: heasoft-fv
Version : 5.3
Upstream Author : William Pence, Pan Chai
* URL :
http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/software/lheasoft/ftools/fv/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: tcl/tk, C
Desc
25 matches
Mail list logo
