On 05/08/2013 06:30 PM, Peter Samuelson wrote:
# in unstable
Package: bar
Build-Depends: libfoo-dev (= 1.5)
The 'bar' maintainer intended to require the unstable version of
libfoo-dev, but in fact the dependency is satisfied from stable as
well.
Yeah! And this mistake is very
On 2013-05-09 00:48, anarcat wrote:
[...]
In fact, I am of the opinion that we should relax the requirements that
the release team systematically review every diff posted during the
freeze, especially if the freeze is going to last almost a year... That
always seemed to me to be an insane
Hi,
On Wed, 08 May 2013, Holger Levsen wrote:
I actually really like this idea! (Though I suggest Debian Personal
Archive.)
It's really different from what people know as PPAs.
To be fair, Personal is probably not relevant either. I expect many of
those repositories to be maintained by
On 2013-05-09 07:56, Paul Wise wrote:
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
I just noticed that we have the first amd64 package in the archive that
has dependencies on :i386 qualified libraries:
Package: teamspeak-client
It appears that will block it from reaching
Hi,
Without discussing whether adding generalized soft dependencies would be a
good idea or not, let me give you my two cents about the syntax.
Quoting Eugene V. Lyubimkin (2013-05-08 20:51:54)
Soft-Depends: a {90%}, b (= 1.2) {20%}, c (= 4) {99%}, c (= 6) {70%}
Soft-Depends: iceweasel
On 05/07/2013 10:34 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Debian backports offers me *one* repository. I need 3 of them:
I don't see why. The combination of suites we have now should be
enough. Here is what I would do...
- stable -1 (currently OpenStack
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 02:49:57PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Hi,
now might be the right time to start a discussion about release goals
for jessie. Here are some points that come into my mind right now (and
some were already discussed very recently):
* multiarch compatible binNMUs
*
On Thu, 9 May 2013 03:31:30 +0200, m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) wrote:
This is not relevant for what we are talking about because /usr *will*
be required be available to boot the system no matter where the files
currently in /{bin,sbin,lib} will end up.
Yes. That is really bad news and I hate
On Thu, 9 May 2013 03:43:44 +0200, m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) wrote:
Let's assume that at this point there are no files in /{bin,sbin,lib}
which have the same name of a file in /usr/{bin,sbin,lib} but are not
a symlink to them (which I suspect is something that we want anyway).
For each $file
On May 09, Marc Haber mh+debian-de...@zugschlus.de wrote:
That's a hack which is acceptable for single-user home desktops. We're
talking about professional IT here.
Great, if this is the strongest objection you have then looks like it
can be done.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description:
On Thu, 9 May 2013 10:10:01 +0200, Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org wrote:
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 02:49:57PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Hi,
now might be the right time to start a discussion about release goals
for jessie. Here are some points that come into my mind right now (and
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 04:51:14PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
It is good to have it released now, but I think we are all (mostly?)
agreed that wheezy took longer to release than we would have liked.
In particular, the RC bug count didn't drop quickly enough.
Thanks for bringing this up!
I
Hi,
I'm unlikely to be able to do much archive rebuild work in the coming year, so
I would welcome help on that front.
Here is the job description:
- maintain scripts to organize archive rebuilds, parse logs and file bugs
Required skills: basic Ruby knowledge (or willingness to learn)
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 08:43:22AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
On 2013-05-09 07:56, Paul Wise wrote:
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
I just noticed that we have the first amd64 package in the archive that
has dependencies on :i386 qualified libraries:
Package:
Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org writes:
On 05/08/2013 06:30 PM, Peter Samuelson wrote:
# in unstable
Package: bar
Build-Depends: libfoo-dev (= 1.5)
The 'bar' maintainer intended to require the unstable version of
libfoo-dev, but in fact the dependency is satisfied from stable as
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 04:56:04PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 05:35:11PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On May 07, ?? ?? pashev.i...@gmail.com wrote:
What about merging / and /usr ?
An ambitious plan.
I strongly support the everything in /usr scheme,
On 05/09/2013 02:38 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 08 May 2013, Holger Levsen wrote:
I actually really like this idea! (Though I suggest Debian Personal
Archive.)
It's really different from what people know as PPAs.
To be fair, Personal is probably not relevant either. I expect
On 05/07/2013 04:12 PM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
Providing backports doesn't free you from the burden of making sure
upgrades work. Thomas is facing a very large chunk of work to make sure
upgrades from the no-longer-supported E release to whatever might be in
jessie, since upstream breaks APIs
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 09:12:12AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
On 05/07/2013 11:41 AM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 05:36:41PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On May 07, Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org wrote:
No please. We are good about making sure they each mean
On 09/05/13 07:38, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
bikeshed \o/
You probably meant this to be a comment on the discussion rather than a
suggested name, but until it gets uploaded to unstable, you can get
GNOME 3.8 from the GNOME Team bikeshed actually sounds like a
reasonable sentence to write. :-)
(Or
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 11:50:31AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
If you make /usr a symlink to / then there will be to distinct paths
to each file and that will confuse dpkg.
The first problem that comes to mind is package A containing /bin/foo
and package B containing /usr/bin/foo.
On 09/05/13 at 08:32 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
The execution of the time-based freeze might have failed. Also,
testing did not serving its purpose of always being in (a
near-)releasable state[2] with its 500+ RC bugs at the start of the
freeze was not ideal (either?).
I think that one
Hi!
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@debian.org writes:
Also, we should be more agressive at getting down the number of RC bugs
by automatically removing RC-buggy not-so-important packages. For
example, if we keep the current time-based freeze policy for jessie, we
could announce that all
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:55:03 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Also, we should be more agressive at getting down the number of RC bugs
by automatically removing RC-buggy not-so-important packages. For
example, if we keep the current time-based freeze policy for jessie, we
could announce that
Another opportunity these XPAs will bring, especially the ones that will
be used for staging large transitions, is to run piuparts and related
tests to discover (and fix) problems before they get introduced into
unstable.
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@debian.org writes:
Also, we should be more agressive at getting down the number of RC bugs
by automatically removing RC-buggy not-so-important packages.
This sounds like a good idea. If somebody is interested in the package
they can easily reintroduce it after they have
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 08:14:32PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
On Wed, 8 May 2013 17:32:13 +0200, Helmut Grohne hel...@subdivi.de
wrote:
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 12:19:25PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
Fedora updates are different. (And so are Ubuntu updates, if one considers
that it's possible
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ilyas Gasanov torso.n...@gmail.com
* Package name: hyphen-ru
Version : 20030310
Upstream Author : Alexander I. Lebedev s...@scon155.phys.msu.su
* URL : http://scon155.phys.msu.su/~swan/hyphenation.html
* License : LPPL
Hello Developer Group,
can someone explain what is happen on line one from this listing?
why i loos the interrupt?
what is the Status 0x50?
has someone a idea in which Documentation an can finde more informations
about 0x50?
May 7 19:39:57 lxhs110a kernel: [316946.812055] ata2: lost
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mike Gabriel mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de
* Package name: node-keypress
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Nathan Rajlich nat...@tootallnate.net
* URL : https://github.com/TooTallNate/keypress
* License : MIT
On Thu, 9 May 2013 12:33:47 +0100, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net
wrote:
Regarding rescue, the initramfs has a rescue shell which I've found
to be just as useful as single user mode.
Isn't that the one that doesn't even have a shell history or tab
completion?
Once it has mounted the
rootfs,
On Thu, 9 May 2013 10:40:14 +0200, m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) wrote:
On May 09, Marc Haber mh+debian-de...@zugschlus.de wrote:
That's a hack which is acceptable for single-user home desktops. We're
talking about professional IT here.
Great, if this is the strongest objection you have then
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mike Gabriel mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de
* Package name: node-commander
Version : 1.1.1
Upstream Author : TJ Holowaychuk t...@vision-media.ca
* URL : https://github.com/visionmedia/commander.js
* License : MIT
Marc Haber mh+debian-de...@zugschlus.de writes:
Isn't that the one that doesn't even have a shell history or tab
completion?
At least in squeeze I have both. Try booting with e.g. break=top to see
yourself.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On 09/05/13 at 13:20 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:55:03 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Also, we should be more agressive at getting down the number of RC bugs
by automatically removing RC-buggy not-so-important packages. For
example, if we keep the current
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 10:32:09AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
That's how I do it for new installs. However, this is vastly more
complex than the traditional setup, and it doesn't help for systems in
maintenance mode that, for example, cannot be changed because of
service level agreements and
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mike Gabriel mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de
* Package name: node-channels
Version : 0.0.5
Upstream Author : Peter 'Pita' Martischka petermartisc...@googlemail.com
* URL : https://github.com/Pita/channels
* License :
On May 09, Marc Haber mh+debian-de...@zugschlus.de wrote:
If you don't care about the companies that use Debian and you want
their sponsoring money to go elsewhere, yes, absolutely do this.
Actually I care a lot, since I happen to have a role in one which
manages quite a bit of Debian servers
* Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it [130509 16:03]:
So, please let me know if you have some technical objections better
than it's an hack.
Having a seperate / means you have an instant rescue image that has
just the right kernel and tools you need to repair the rest of your
system. You also have one
On 2013-05-09 15:58:02 +0800 (+0800), Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 05/07/2013 10:34 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
[...]
Also, the rules in backports is that packages should be
already migrated to testing. The point is, if I had PPAs, I
wouldn't
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 10:43:27AM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
Looks like it might be possible to for test with lintian.
I presume it's OK to add the implicit 0: to non-epoch depends?
If so, lintian could complain whenever a dependency is specified on a
package with an epoch, unless the
On 05/07/2013 03:34 PM, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
While there are certainly use cases that will stay in a PPA forever
(Thomas described one)
And I seriously wished it wasn't the case, and
that upstream understood better what the
distribution requirements are.
This should be considered as the last
* Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net [130509 13:34]:
The assumptions here are that a separate rootfs decreases the chance
of breakage, and that you'll need the rootfs to perform the rescue.
No, the point is that having two file systems reduces the amout of
breakage you get.
All the important
On 2013-05-09 22:55:33 +0800 (+0800), Thomas Goirand wrote:
[...]
And I seriously wished it wasn't the case, and that upstream
understood better what the distribution requirements are.
[...]
Actually, in this case (OpenStack) from what I've seen the upstream
community understands the
* Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org, 2013-05-09, 07:39:
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 10:43:27AM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
Looks like it might be possible to for test with lintian.
I presume it's OK to add the implicit 0: to non-epoch depends?
If so, lintian could complain whenever a dependency is
+++ Goswin von Brederlow [2013-05-09 11:39 +0200]:
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 08:43:22AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
On 2013-05-09 07:56, Paul Wise wrote:
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
I just noticed that we have the first amd64 package in the archive that
-security.
S
[1]
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=debian...@lists.debian.org;tag=qa-ftbfs-20130509
[2] among amusing indications that -Werror is not quite right: byzanz:
FTBFS: record.c:59:3: error: function might be possible candidate for
'gnu_printf' format attribute
On May 09, Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org wrote:
Or in other words: to make essential functionality not available if
/usr is broken.
Again: this is not we are discussing. Essential functionality is moving
to /usr anyway, no matter if /bin will become a symlink to /usr/bin.
Having a
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Philip Hands p...@hands.com wrote:
I presume it's OK to add the implicit 0: to non-epoch depends?
No, that not okay. dpkg rewrites versions at times – mainly in
/var/lib/dpkg/status – to a canonical form, so this information is
lost at some point.
Especially
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org
* Package name: debmake
Version : 4.0.0
Upstream Author : Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org
* URL : none yet
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python3
Description : helper script to make the
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Eugene V. Lyubimkin jac...@debian.org wrote:
Soft-Depends: a {90%}, b (= 1.2) {20%}, c (= 4) {99%}, c (= 6) {70%}
If we assume its already hard to decide recommends or suggests it will
be impossible to choose a number between 0 and 100. Basically we are rating
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Marc Haber mh+debian-de...@zugschlus.de wrote:
On Wed, 8 May 2013 11:56:15 +0200, Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org
wrote:
Please re-read the policy, especially 2.5:
| Packages must not depend on packages with lower priority values
| (excluding build-time
On 05/08/2013 05:07 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 05/08/2013 11:27 AM, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 09:46:02AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
What I think should be fixed is the fact that it doesn't
appear in the filename. I never understood why they
don't. Did I miss something?
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Micah Anderson mi...@debian.org
* Package name: python-autopep8
Version : 0.8.7
Upstream Author : Hideo Hattori hhatto...@gmail.com
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/autopep8
* License : Expat
Programming Lang:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Micah Anderson mi...@debian.org
* Package name: python-paisley
Version : 0.3.1
Upstream Author : David Reid and Thomas Herve
* URL : https://github.com/objcode/paisley
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Python
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Micah Anderson mi...@debian.org
* Package name: python-dirspec
Version : 4.2.0
Upstream Author : Canonical Ltd.
* URL : https://launchpad.net/dirspec
* License : LGPL-3
Programming Lang: Python
Description :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Micah Anderson mi...@debian.org
* Package name: u1db
Version : 0.1.4
Upstream Author : Canonical Ltd
* URL : https://launchpad.net/u1db
* License : LGPL-3
Programming Lang: Python, C
Description : Ubuntu One
It seems you have a faulty hard disk.
Istimsak abdulbsir
On May 9, 2013 7:47 AM, Mailbox maill...@ai-t.eu wrote:
Hello Developer Group,
can someone explain what is happen on line one from this listing?
why i loos the interrupt?
what is the Status 0x50?
has someone a idea in which
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 08:43:22AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
On 2013-05-09 07:56, Paul Wise wrote:
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
I just noticed that we have the first amd64 package in the archive that
has dependencies on :i386 qualified libraries:
Package:
Hi,
Thank you for comments.
2013-05-09 18:44, David Kalnischkies:
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Eugene V. Lyubimkin jac...@debian.org wrote:
Soft-Depends: a {90%}, b (= 1.2) {20%}, c (= 4) {99%}, c (= 6) {70%}
If we assume its already hard to decide recommends or suggests it will
be
Hi,
2013-05-09 09:01, Johannes Schauer:
[...]
Soft-Depends: a [minthresh:90], b (= 1.2) [minthresh:20], c (= 4)
[minthresh:99], c (= 6) [minthresh:70]
Soft-Depends: iceweasel [minthresh:50 tag:desktop], curl [minthresh:95
!installed:wget]
Indeed, this syntax would be just as good.
--
This is from Russ Allbery and myself. See http://wiki.debian.org/Debate
for context, and http://wiki.debian.org/AlwaysReleasableTesting for
the canonical version of this essay. We hope that the readers will take
their time to read this, reflect on it, and then maybe write their own
essay and add
On 2013-05-09 21:00, Steve Langasek wrote:
[...]
Sorry for not knowing the answer to this, but does britney support :any
dependencies? These don't require any cross-architecture dependency
resolution, but should be satisfiable within each architecture; britney just
needs to support them.
In article 518b7cf6.3080...@debian.org you write:
On 09/05/13 07:38, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
bikeshed \o/
You probably meant this to be a comment on the discussion rather than a
suggested name, but until it gets uploaded to unstable, you can get
GNOME 3.8 from the GNOME Team bikeshed actually
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 01:45:55PM +0200, Mailbox wrote:
Hello Developer Group,
can someone explain what is happen on line one from this listing?
[...]
This is off-topic; you should ask on the debian-user list or other
support channel.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
We get into the habit of living
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mike Gabriel mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de
* Package name: node-security
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Chad Weider cwei...@oofn.net
* URL : https://github.com/cweider/js-security
* License : Expat
Programming
On Thu, 2013-05-09 at 20:45 +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
This e-mail is jointly from Lars Wirzenius and Russ Allbery.
The executive summary: We'd like to see more thoughtful debates
of important Debian development issues, and have created
http://wiki.debian.org/Debate as a way to encourage
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mike Gabriel mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de
* Package name: node-node-redis
Version : 0.1.6
Upstream Author : Tim Smart t...@fostle.com
* URL : https://github.com/tim-smart/node-redis
* License : Expat
Programming
Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org writes:
On Mon, 06 May 2013, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
Nah, the webinterface just should end up like the DAM webinterface: You
do whatever you need, then click a button - and voila, there is
everything ready to copy/paste into a MUA. Send with sig, done.
Why?
❦ 9 mai 2013 21:49 CEST, Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi :
* Remove RC buggy packages sooner rather than later. An RC buggy
package should be removed at soon as possible: when the bug
is identified, allow a bit of time for the bug to be verified
(was it actually an RC bug?), but after
Игорь Пашев pashev.i...@gmail.com writes:
Will it change anything except non-linux systems will get libpcre3 by
default, while do not need it?
Maybe make libselinux optional? ;-)
windlord:~ apt-cache rdepends libselinux1 | tail
libglib2.0-0
gdm3
dump
dpkg
dmraid
dbus-1-dbg
dbus
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Adrian Alves aal...@gmail.com
* Package name: python-grokmirror
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Konstantin Ryabitsev mri...@kernel.org
* URL : https://git.kernel.org/cgit/utils/grokmirror/grokmirror.git
* License : GPL
Vincent Bernat ber...@debian.org writes:
❦ 9 mai 2013 21:49 CEST, Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi :
A package that is not included in one or more of the reference
installations is a package we want to include in the release, but we
will not delay the release for its sake. We should have a low
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mike Gabriel mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de
* Package name: node-node-dequeue
Version : 1.0.3
Upstream Author : Sean (lleo) M. Egan lle...@gmail.com
* URL : https://github.com/lleo/node-dequeue
* License : BSD-2-clause
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 512 (new: 9)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 139 (new: 5)
Total number of packages
On Thu, 09 May 2013, Steve McIntyre wrote:
In article 518b7cf6.3080...@debian.org you write:
On 09/05/13 07:38, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
bikeshed \o/
You probably meant this to be a comment on the discussion rather than a
suggested name, but until it gets uploaded to unstable, you can get
On 09/05/2013 06:06, Florian Weimer wrote:
I mistyped, I meant ABI. I'm deeply sorry about that, it mangles my
statement quite badly.
AFAIK, this is the major reason why the C++11 support is still marked
as experimental.
C++ never had a set ABI in the standard. It's up to
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 4:33 AM, Russ Allbery wrote:
That level of security isn't great, though. GPG keys are much more secure
than that password. What we would want for equivalent security in a web
interface is personal X.509 certificates.
I think it would be interesting to have that
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 4:38 AM, Russ Allbery wrote:
Игорь Пашев writes:
Will it change anything except non-linux systems will get libpcre3 by
default, while do not need it?
Maybe make libselinux optional? ;-)
windlord:~ apt-cache rdepends libselinux1 | tail
...
No. :)
Since it is
Le Thu, May 09, 2013 at 08:38:02AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
Hi,
On Wed, 08 May 2013, Holger Levsen wrote:
I actually really like this idea! (Though I suggest Debian Personal
Archive.)
It's really different from what people know as PPAs.
To be fair, Personal is probably not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 09:38:36 +0400
Source: mathjax
Binary: libjs-mathjax fonts-mathjax fonts-mathjax-extras
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.1+20121028-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dmitry Shachnev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 08:19:33 +0200
Source: pcre-ocaml
Binary: libpcre-ocaml libpcre-ocaml-dev
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 7.0.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 12:52:19 +0700
Source: fonts-tlwg
Binary: fonts-tlwg-kinnari fonts-tlwg-garuda fonts-tlwg-norasi fonts-tlwg-loma
fonts-tlwg-mono fonts-tlwg-typewriter fonts-tlwg-typist fonts-tlwg-typo
fonts-tlwg-umpush
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 00:51:39 +0200
Source: lightproof
Binary: libreoffice-lightproof-en libreoffice-lightproof-hu
libreoffice-lightproof-ru-ru
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.5+git20121204-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 00:31:47 +0200
Source: sampleicc
Binary: libsampleicc-dev libsampleicc2 libicc-utils-dev libicc-utils2
sampleicc-tools
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.6.4-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 09:59:00 +0200
Source: alsa-lib
Binary: libasound2 libasound2-dev libasound2-dbg libasound2-udeb libasound2-doc
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 1.0.27-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 21:49:41 +0200
Source: blobby
Binary: blobby blobby-server blobby-data
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 1.0~rc3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Games Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 08:22:22 +0200
Source: cairosvg
Binary: python-cairosvg python3-cairosvg
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Python Modules Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 10:36:41 +0200
Source: colorhug-client
Binary: colorhug-client
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.2.0-2
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Michal Čihař ni...@debian.org
Changed-By: Michal Čihař
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 09:24:54 +0200
Source: fonts-sil-padauk
Binary: fonts-sil-padauk fonts-sil-padauk-udeb
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.80-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Fonts Task Force
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 14:49:05 +0700
Source: fonts-sipa-arundina
Binary: fonts-sipa-arundina latex-fonts-sipa-arundina ttf-thai-arundina
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.2.0-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Theppitak
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 09:43:48 +0100
Source: gnome-sushi
Binary: gnome-sushi
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.4.1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian GNOME Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 16:18:57 +0100
Source: ifrit
Binary: ifrit
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.3.4-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org
Changed-By: Colin Watson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 10:12:40 +0200
Source: logfs-tools
Binary: logfs-tools logfs-tools-dbg
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 20121013-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Filesystems Group
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 09:45:57 +0100
Source: openssh
Binary: openssh-client openssh-server ssh ssh-krb5 ssh-askpass-gnome
openssh-client-udeb openssh-server-udeb
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1:6.2p1-2
Distribution: unstable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 10:13:12 +0200
Source: puppet-lint
Binary: puppet-lint
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.3.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Puppet Package Maintainers
pkg-puppet-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 10:29:33 +0200
Source: purple-plugin-pack
Binary: pidgin-plugin-pack
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.7.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Felix Geyer fge...@debian.org
Changed-By: Felix Geyer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 16:36:04 +0200
Source: drc
Binary: drc
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 3.2.1~dfsg0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 00:14:55 +0100
Source: grub2
Binary: grub2 grub-linuxbios grub-efi grub-common grub2-common grub-emu
grub-emu-dbg grub-pc-bin grub-pc-dbg grub-pc grub-rescue-pc grub-coreboot-bin
grub-coreboot-dbg grub-coreboot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 11:49:19 +0200
Source: gtypist
Binary: gtypist
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.9.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ben Armstrong sy...@sanctuary.nslug.ns.ca
Changed-By: Daniel Leidert
1 - 100 of 256 matches
Mail list logo
