On 4/30/06, Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brian Eaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://rsync.samba.org/rsync-and-debian/rsync-and-debian.html
Has anyone ever done some log file analysis to figure out how much
bandwidth would be saved by transferring package deltas instead
On 5/1/06, Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Brian Eaton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060501 15:51]:
The only time delta packages will be a win is for upgrades where the
client has the original package cached.
If one does it right, it might be enough if the original package is
*installed
On 5/1/06, Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Brian Eaton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060501 16:42]:
On 5/1/06, Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If one does it right, it might be enough if the original package is
*installed*. And that happens quite often, e.g. even for security
On 5/1/06, Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or you could create the diffdebs before upload or on ftp-master, and
include the diffdebs somehow in the Packages file (so they're signed as
well by the usual mechanismn).
My initial view is that any delta package system that doesn't
reproduce
Hello all -
Regarding the ideas discussed here:
http://rsync.samba.org/rsync-and-debian/rsync-and-debian.html
Has anyone ever done some log file analysis to figure out how much
bandwidth would be saved by transferring package deltas instead of
entire new packages?
Assuming someone hasn't done
5 matches
Mail list logo
