Re: Signature de cle en Alsace (was: Re: Bug#198987: Is something planned for this bug?)

2003-08-19 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le Tue, Aug 19, 2003, à 04:41:38PM +0200, Christian Perrier a écrit: Quoting Philipp Kern ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 15:33, Christian Perrier wrote: {snip} At least I'm not added as looking for keysigning. If that helps. I guess somebody listed from Haut Rhin would

Re: CUPS should be the default print service in Debian/Sarge

2003-07-31 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le Thu, Jul 31, 2003, à 09:44:17AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz a écrit: The last time I tried to use CUPS, I found it to be so user friendly that I couldn't get it to do anything useful. Very pretty, less functional; and the documentation was entirely inadequate. Well, while what you describe

Re: CUPS should be the default print service in Debian/Sarge

2003-07-31 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le Thu, Jul 31, 2003, à 03:09:15PM +0100, Ross Burton a écrit: On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 15:00, Cyrille Chepelov wrote: if only gnome-cups-manager wasn't leaking memory like a CPU leaks heat...) Terribly sorry about this. It's only gnome-cups-icon which leaks like mad, so you can kill

Re: quel nom pour une locale fr_geek ?

2003-07-11 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le Thu, Jul 10, 2003, à 10:25:24PM +0200, Martin Quinson a écrit: - une enfilade de messages sur traduc.org pour discuter avec les autres groupes de traduction du probleme et des avantages compares des solutions possibles (qui d'ailleurs a devie sur un probleme sur le nombre 1 000 000,

quel nom pour une locale fr_geek ?

2003-07-08 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Salut la liste, je viens de mettre à jour spamassassin, et oh! quelle horreur, je découvre ceci: ---8---8 Début des résultats de SpamAssassin - Ce mél est sans doute du spam. Le message original a été modifié afin ^^^ de vous

Re: quel nom pour une locale fr_geek ?

2003-07-08 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le Tue, Jul 08, 2003, à 12:21:33PM +0200, LAMBERT Olivier URS TOULOUSE a écrit: (si c'était moi qui avait choisi, quitte à orthographier à la française à tout prix, j'aurais orthographié ça mayle et gardé les sigles tels quels, mais bon). Loupé ! Je soupçonne Cyrille d'être un Langue

Re: quel nom pour une locale fr_geek ?

2003-07-08 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le Tue, Jul 08, 2003, à 12:41:45PM +0200, Christian Perrier a écrit: Pour ma part, je serais tenté de lever un bogue sur spamassassin (qui va remonter upstream...la traduction est ici faite en amont). Dans les traductions Debian, nous utilisons le plus souvent courrier pour mail (on ne met

Re: quel nom pour une locale fr_geek ?

2003-07-08 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le Tue, Jul 08, 2003, à 01:55:42PM +0200, Pierre Machard a écrit: cela dit, le point principal reste: qu'est-il préférable de faire quand on souhaite installer sur sa machine une locale légèrement mais pas trop différente du standard. Pourquoi s'éloigner du standard ? Entant que

Re: quel nom pour une locale fr_geek ?

2003-07-08 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le Tue, Jul 08, 2003, à 01:53:47PM +0200, Martin Quinson a écrit: Juste pour repondre au titre, ca serait geek_FR, c'est a dire le geek tel qu'on le parle en france. Si l'iso 639 etait a jour, ca pourrait etre gk_FR... euh, n'exagérons rien... Le problème, c'est que ça définit le geek comme

Re: [martin.quinson@tuxfamily.org: Re: quel nom pour une locale fr_geek ?]

2003-07-08 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le Tue, Jul 08, 2003, à 04:34:58PM +0200, Pierre Machard a transmis ceci de Martin Quinson: de prendre les fr.po des programmes que tu veux modifier, et les renomer en fr_CC.po (j'ai detourne le systeme en mettant tes initiales. Ce nom de parametre correspond donc au francais tel qu'on le

Re: Bug#198158: architecture i386 isn't i386 anymore

2003-06-20 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le Fri, Jun 20, 2003, à 07:15:45PM +0200, Sebastian Kapfer a écrit: but dropping all Pentiums until Pentium II generation seems completely foolish. I hope I misunderstood your message. I'd drop the sub-pentiums (i.e. 386 and 486) entirely. Not that my vote would count... Hmmm. Until

Re: Debian for x86-64 (AMD Opteron)

2003-04-10 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le Thu, Apr 10, 2003, à 10:40:47AM +0100, Hamish Marson a écrit: I'm not sure how your logic works out that a 64 bit reg is going to be faster than a 32bit one. Or do you mean simply you're expecting a speedu because there are MORE 64 bit registers tahn 32 bit registers? Reg pressure is

Re: Debian for x86-64 (AMD Opteron)

2003-04-10 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le Thu, Apr 10, 2003, à 03:33:39PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman a écrit: That way you could do something like: # echo x86-64 /etc/dpkg/legal-archs # dpkg -i libgtk2-2.0-1_i386.deb # dpkg -i lib64gtk2-2.0-1_x8664.deb Will we have to also have lib64gtk2.0-dev? Wouldn't that have pretty bad

Accepted valgrind 1.0.4-2 (i386 source)

2002-10-23 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 08:46:04 +0200 Source: valgrind Binary: valgrind Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.0.4-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Cyrille Chepelov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Cyrille Chepelov [EMAIL

Accepted valgrind 1.0.3-1 (i386 source)

2002-09-19 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 07:20:50 +0200 Source: valgrind Binary: valgrind Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.0.3-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Cyrille Chepelov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Cyrille Chepelov [EMAIL

Accepted valgrind 1.0.1-2 (i386 source)

2002-09-02 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 18:52:25 +0200 Source: valgrind Binary: valgrind Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.0.1-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Cyrille Chepelov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Cyrille Chepelov [EMAIL

Accepted valgrind 1.0.1-1 (i386 source)

2002-08-28 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 09:48:30 +0200 Source: valgrind Binary: valgrind Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.0.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Cyrille Chepelov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Cyrille Chepelov [EMAIL

Re: g++ 3.2 on woody ?

2002-08-14 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le Wed, Aug 14, 2002, à 10:15:17AM -0400, Michael Stone a écrit: On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 10:00:35AM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote: On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 08:16:46AM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say: The main point of the GCC 3.2 release is to have a relatively

Re: recompilation : un grand classique

2002-03-05 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le Tue, Mar 05, 2002, à 10:50:52AM +0100, Georges Mariano a écrit: Bref, comment -tout- faire proprement ? En travaillant à ce que woody == stable plutôt que de réinventer woody dans la patate. A++ -- Grumpf.

Re: franc,ais locale (was Re: A language by any other name)

2001-09-14 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le ven, sep 14, 2001, à 04:13:31 +0900, Junichi Uekawa a écrit: On a very different topic, I cannot even type in franc,ais in my system, and it seems to be a character not available in the default locale which is C. C does not specify a charset outside ASCII, does it ? On my system, with

Re: franc,ais locale (was Re: A language by any other name)

2001-09-14 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le ven, sep 14, 2001, à 08:54:40 +0100, Oliver Elphick a écrit: Cyrille Chepelov wrote: Le ven, sep 14, 2001, 04:13:31 +0900, Junichi Uekawa a crit: ... (by the way, does the line mutt added at the very beginning of this post display completely on your screen ?) Your message didn't

Re: franc,ais locale (was Re: A language by any other name)

2001-09-14 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le ven, sep 14, 2001, à 09:39:55 -0500, David Starner a écrit: On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 09:39:10AM +0200, Cyrille Chepelov wrote: (by the way, does the line mutt added at the very beginning of this post display completely on your screen ?) Here it does. The message I got was properly

Re: franc,ais locale (was Re: A language by any other name)

2001-09-14 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le ven, sep 14, 2001, à 12:39:31 -0500, David Starner a écrit: On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 06:02:45PM +0200, Cyrille Chepelov wrote: it looks like it's because your default locale is 8859-1. Nope. My default locale is UTF-8. As someone else said, your headers look fine. I stand corrected