I've been looking at the RFS process [1]. Some of this was in the
debian-mentors list about a year ago, albeit using corrupt data.
First the good news:
- About 1000 RFS submissions have led to accepted packages since January 2012
- The package acceptance rate has consistently been about 2/3
-
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Don Armstrong d...@debian.org wrote:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?package=sponsorship-requestsarchive=both
lists all of the bugs. The oldest being #657303, and newer ones.
If you give archive=yes, you only get archived bugs.
Ok, I've
I was interested in doing some ongoing analysis of historical RFS
processing, and ran into trouble getting the archived bug information.
The bugs.debian.org web interface, by default, omits archived entries. When
including archives, the results are truncated. I don't see a way to work
around this
There's also an unofficial public mirror on [1].
Ansgar
[1] http://public-udd-mirror.xvm.mit.edu/
Thanks, that should be perfect for me.
--
Le mieux est l'ennemi du bien - Voltaire
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Don Armstrong d...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, 15 Sep 2013, Dave Steele wrote:
The bugs.debian.org web interface, by default, omits archived entries.
When including archives, the results are truncated.
Which searches are you doing? They should
On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org wrote:
Control: severity 715110 normal
Control: severity 715122 normal
On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 05:01:15AM +, David Steele wrote:
Package: libsamba-util-dev
Version: 4.0.0~beta2+dfsg1-3.2
Severity: serious
User:
On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 5:48 AM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 04:10:16 -0400, Dave Steele wrote:
I guess the next step is a clearer statement of consensus on what to do next.
My position - I believe that the bug submittal, and the current
severity
On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
Hi Dave,
...please do as suggested already and downgrade those bugs to normal ...
OK, I have downgraded those bugs remaining unresolved as normal.
--
Le mieux est l'ennemi du bien - Voltaire
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 3:14 AM, Ondřej Surý ond...@sury.org wrote:
Hmm,
I thought that I have fixed this in 0.11-2.
And I am unable to reproduce the bug in current unstable.
libjson0-dev is no longer failing for me either. My release check of
the list did not catch the fixed package - I
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Ian Jackson
ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk wrote:
Shortly, piuparts.debian.org will be elevating the broken symlink test
in sid from a warning to an error status. In advance of that, bugs
submissions are planned against packages which are responsible for
such
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net wrote:
On 2013-06-30 17:30, Dave Steele wrote:
[...]
...
Debian Orbital Alignment Team pkg-java-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
eclipse-platform-data : eclipse
/usr/lib/eclipse/plugins/org.apache.ant_1.8.3
be other broken symlinks. See the log for a
full list.
[1] - file:///usr/share/doc/dpkg-dev/triggers.txt.gz
[2] - http://www.seanius.net/blog/2009/09/dpkg-triggers-howto/
[3] - http://piuparts.debian.org/sid/broken_symlinks_issue.html
Regards
Dave Steele
log
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
AFAIK most of these get fixed up by ldconfig, which means they're not a
problem in practice.
It wasn't clear to me how this would be the case, so I reran the logs
with a piuparts mod making an ldconfig call before the
13 matches
Mail list logo
