Core dumps are instantly removed

2019-12-13 Thread Dmitry Katsubo
Dear Debian developers, Hopefully you can easily help me with my confusion. I would like to collect / keep core dumps in the system. For that I use systemd-coredump package which is configured as following: === cut /etc/systemd/coredump.conf === [Coredump] Storage=external MaxUse=5G === cut

Re: Linux kernels v3.18.x and v4.2.x in sid

2015-10-27 Thread Dmitry Katsubo
On 2015-10-25 07:11, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 10:59:47PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: >> On 24/10/15 22:17, Dmitry Katsubo wrote: >>> I would be happy to. However it does not allow me to use the latest >>> kernel from 3.x branch (3.16 is now 1

Re: Linux kernels v3.18.x and v4.2.x in sid

2015-10-27 Thread Dmitry Katsubo
On 27/10/2015 10:31, Ian Campbell wrote: >> Hm, kernel.org says that 3.18 is the long-term support kernel. > > I'm afraid that LTS from kernel.org != stable support from Debian. > > Debian typically picks a single kernel version for a stable release and > supports it for the lifetime of that

Re: Linux kernels v3.18.x and v4.2.x in sid

2015-10-24 Thread Dmitry Katsubo
On 24/10/2015 14:56, James Cowgill wrote: > On Sat, 2015-10-24 at 01:02 +0200, Dmitry Katsubo wrote: >> On 23/10/2015 22:43, James Cowgill wrote: >>> If you specifically want 3.18, you can download it from >>> snapshot.debian.org. http://snapshot.debian.org/package/lin

Linux kernels v3.18.x and v4.2.x in sid

2015-10-23 Thread Dmitry Katsubo
Dear Debian developers, I wonder if somebody knows what are the plans for packaging kernels 3.18.x and 4.2.x? 3.18 was released long time ago, and I think it is mature. 4.2.x would be nice to play with. I have searched here: > https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=all=names=kernel-image but

Re: Linux kernels v3.18.x and v4.2.x in sid

2015-10-23 Thread Dmitry Katsubo
On 23/10/2015 22:43, James Cowgill wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 2015-10-21 at 12:35 +0200, Dmitry Katsubo wrote: >> Dear Debian developers, >> >> I wonder if somebody knows what are the plans for packaging >> kernels 3.18.x and 4.2.x? 3.18 was released long time ago,

Should .a library contains non-reallocatable code?

2015-02-14 Thread Dmitry Katsubo
. -- Forwarded message -- From: Dmitry Katsubo dm...@mail.ru Date: 2015-01-10 15:39 GMT+01:00 Subject: Re: Bug#774164: libocrad-dev: libocrad.a contains non-reallocatable code To: Alexander Alemayhu alexander.alema...@googlemail.com On 06/01/2015 22:54, Alexander Alemayhu wrote: It might take

Re: Find out what symbols in dynamic library have not been compiled with -fPIC

2014-12-27 Thread Dmitry Katsubo
On 24/12/2014 23:25, Mike Hommey wrote: Install the elfutils package and use eu-findtextrel, it's sometimes wrong, but it should get you started. The manual way to do this is to crossreference the output of readelf -r with the symbol table and readelf -l. Thanks, Mike, that helped a lot.

Find out what symbols in dynamic library have not been compiled with -fPIC

2014-12-24 Thread Dmitry Katsubo
Dear Debian developers, When trying to create a package that includes the library, I am reported the following error by lintian: E: libosra1: shlib-with-non-pic-code usr/lib/libosra.so I understand what the problem is about, but I would like to know which *functions* in resulting .so are not

Re: dh_shlibdeps warnings concerning undefined OpenMP symbols

2011-04-05 Thread Dmitry Katsubo
On 31.03.2011 22:16, Jakub Wilk wrote: You do need -lgomp. You normally don't (need to) link to gomp explicitly. My wild guess is: Dmitry used -fopenmp while compiling *.o, but not when linking the shared library. Exactly! Thank you, Jakub, for nice guess. AC_OPENMP() macro documentation

Re: dh_shlibdeps warnings concerning undefined OpenMP symbols

2011-04-01 Thread Dmitry Katsubo
On 31.03.2011 22:16, Jakub Wilk wrote: You do need -lgomp. You normally don't (need to) link to gomp explicitly. My wild guess is: Dmitry used -fopenmp while compiling *.o, but not when linking the shared library. Exactly! Thank you, Jakub, for nice guess. AC_OPENMP() macro documentation

dh_shlibdeps warnings concerning undefined OpenMP symbols

2011-03-31 Thread Dmitry Katsubo
Dear developers, I have the question concerning the following dh_shlibdeps warning, which is triggered for library that is compiled witn OpenMP support: dh_shlibdeps dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol GOMP_critical_start used by debian/libosra0/usr/lib/libosra.so.0.0.10308 found in none of

Re: dh_shlibdeps warnings concerning undefined OpenMP symbols

2011-03-31 Thread Dmitry Katsubo
On 31.03.2011 18:20, Cyril Brulebois wrote: you may want to check through objdump -x $foo.so|grep NEEDED; ldd shows recursive dependencies. KiBi. KiBi, thanks for the hint. It turned out that libgomp is not listed as direct dependency of my library. Does it mean I have to put gcc-4.4 into

Re: Static linking: pkgconfig vs libtool

2010-11-22 Thread Dmitry Katsubo
On 19.11.2010 22:51, Russ Allbery wrote: Dmitry Katsubo dm...@mail.ru writes: The first problem I faced is that it is difficult to explore what should be the list of libraries for static linking (as I have to provide the list of libraries which are direct dependencies as well as indirect). I

Static linking: pkgconfig vs libtool

2010-11-19 Thread Dmitry Katsubo
Dear Debian Developers! In the application I am taking part in, I am trying to create a configuration script to be able to provide two deliverables: dynamically-linked executable and statically-linked. The first problem I faced is that it is difficult to explore what should be the list of