,
which is where it has the greatest impact, and that is what this
is about: determining if it is possible and desirable for Debian
that this particular bit *also* happens in Debian.
And that truly has nothing to do with Devuan or what people think
of it.
--
Evilham
ould be enabled by
default for "everyone" unless it can be trivially disabled by the
network operator.
Quite confusing, at least for me it'd look as having all the
issues of centralising DNS (a couple kill-switches for de-facto
global censorship) and then undoing all the benefits of using
encrypted DNS in the first place.
--
Evilham
nd hard-to-spot
bugs.
If that's accepted and respected, it's not a thing to argue about
or waste brain-cycles in, in the meantime things are getting both
calmer and better.
--
Evilham
, as they steadily rotted in Debian.
it's my first time writing to this ML, which calls for a quick
hello/intro and the FYI that I intended to send:
The quick hello/intro:
I go on the internet by Evilham and have been using Debian for ages.
When it was time for me to give back to the community, sy
4 matches
Mail list logo
