On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 10:05 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 07:04:01AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Mon, May 21, 2007 at 11:02:21AM +0300, Andrei Popescu a écrit :
IMHO forcing people to take off-topic discussions out
By the way, isn't debian-devel an
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 16:41 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Frans, Cord, Martin, Pascal,
I'm writing the listmasters because reading debian-user has become
nearly unbearable for me (one of the sadly few DDs who bothers to read
our user lists) due to volume and offensiveness/repetativeness of
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 08:17 +0200, Mgr. Peter Tuharsky wrote:
Lennart said
Peter said
If You and several people claim they haven't met such problems with
testing, I can live with that. I also heard people whose experience was
different, and my personal one is closer to them. That's all.
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 21:34 +0200, Amir Tabatabaei wrote:
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 12:29 -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote:
You should try using aptitude, it does what you want ;-)
Just a friendly question: Why is this feature not added to apt-get, too?
It is so useful and there are a lot
. Now that the complaint is coming from a DD, I hope that
some action/policy will be laid out...
Greg Folkert (http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2007/05/msg01282.html)
even made a mockery of people complaining about OT posts. That is just sad.
It was a mockery, but if you'll notice I have
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 16:27 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 06:42:48PM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
I guess you'd rather see the OT posters go away. There are about 30 of
us. Though, I got the hint with Neil Sumner reporting me to the DPL,
after I told him to STFU
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 16:14 -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 01:44 +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Ludovic Rousseau said:
Le 10.05.2007, à 00:25:32, Stephen Gran a écrit:
I have always just asked them on IRC on #debian-kernel.
Have you
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 21:06 -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 04:19:28PM -0400, Greg Folkert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
It was really hard for me to switch to using aptitude, but now since I
have, I get annoyed when I use apt-get, although I use apt-get regularly
On Sat, 2007-05-19 at 00:16 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Fri, 18 May 2007 19:43:31 -0400, Felipe Sateler [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Don Armstrong wrote:
For example, in the case you're talking about, you'd have to explain
that ucf would like to be able to use debconf-loadtemplate from
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 07:56 +0200, Mgr. Peter Tuharsky wrote:
Michelle Konzack said:
You forger that DOWNGRADING is officialy NOT SUPPORTED by Debian.
That should be changed anyway, since security upgrades occasionally
break things too.
You keep saying this, I haven't seen this in Sarge
On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 01:44 +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Ludovic Rousseau said:
Le 10.05.2007, à 00:25:32, Stephen Gran a écrit:
I have always just asked them on IRC on #debian-kernel.
Have you done this time again?
If not, could you? (I do not use IRC.)
On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 14:55 +0200, Mgr. Peter Tuharsky wrote:
Ask somebody, what distro would he install at desktop for novice or
M$ refugee?
For me the choice is clear. I use Debian for myself. I choose to support
Ubuntu for people that do not want as many choices. This is what M$
refugees
On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 21:43 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Tue, 15 May 2007, Mgr. Peter Tuharsky wrote:
We're going OT, however my experience based on last two Debian
releases:
testing becomes quite stable in means of usability somewhere half
year
before it's released as stable. The
On Sun, 2007-05-13 at 17:07 +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
Didn't your AM tell you? All Debian developers are required to be
impervious to humour, irony, puns, simile, or for that matter rational
thinking.
Where do I sign up for this? As I already have traits, I should be a
shoe-in and should
On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 21:25 -0500, David Moreno Garza wrote:
Ludovic Rousseau escribió:
I installed linux-image-2.6.21-1-686 from
http://kernel-archive.buildserver.net and I would like to also install
linux-headers-2.6.21-1-686 (to build some modules for the Apple MacBook
Pro not included
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 20:28 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: 09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
Version : 09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
Upstream Author : MPAA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL
I have to apologize publicly on my choice of language.
I have been contacted by a few people (some from Debian, others being
list subscribers) asking to me to consider the wide ranging areas and
breadth of people subscribed to this list. Considering this on when
using language that cause one's
On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 15:45 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 04:16:29PM +0200, Jérémy Bobbio a écrit :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jérémy Bobbio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Torbutton is a 1-click way for Iceweasel/Icedove users to enable or disable
the
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 17:01 +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Perhaps we should really propose a Day of No Spam-Filtering on
lists.d.o. ;-)
Umm, is there enough BANDWIDTH ON THE ENTARWEB to support that?
/me thinks not
--
greg, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The technology that is
Stronger, better,
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 02:25 +0930, Stef Daniels wrote:
Greetings,
I am a happy user of the Debian GNU\Linux
Distribution. I would like to pose a question to the developers, who
may be able to provide the following option:
Could an option for the installation of a default of
On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 15:24 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to start a new sub-project called Debian4Business or perhaps
Debian-Office.I have a slight preference for the first name, but this is
discussable of course.
Since your are using Debian as a base, have at it. Do you best.
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 17:57 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
Emanuele Rocca píše v Čt 15. 03. 2007 v 10:33 +0100:
Hi guys,
quoting http://wiki.debian.org/DebianSystem#systemadministration
Debian has been qualified as a OMG operating system for administrators,
primarily because of its ease
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 22:58 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
the maintainer of tilda (Zak Elep) seems disappeared :) I wrote him a
lot of e-mails and he never answered me.
I like this useful program, I use it every day, that's why I've built
tilda[1] with the new upstream version and
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 02:25 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greg Folkert ha scritto:
Not to be a stick in the mud... but I show this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache show tilda
Package: tilda
Priority: optional
Section: x11
Installed-Size: 100
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 22:55 +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 02:13:07PM -0400, Matthias Julius wrote:
I don't think it needs win64-only games.
Please remember that this is debian-devel and not some general
discussion list.
HA, that is going in the context is everything
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 15:16 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
1) fix software that interprets incoming mails
There is nothing wrong with the software that interprets
incoming mails; the mails that fail actually fail cryptographic
checks
On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 00:45 -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 01:17:23AM -0400, Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh wrote:
My distro is Debian Etch.
kernel is 2.6.18
I have post it to pthread mailing list,They said me that i reinstall
libc6-dev package,i reinstalled it,But i see given
On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 11:03 -0400, Michael S. Peek wrote:
Hi gurus,
I'm looking to buy or build an install host -- one machine dedicated to
building and serving a local repository for the purposes of
installing/upgrading/maintaining other Debian hosts throughout our
organization. The
On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 21:21 +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
Heya,
And for clarity, IA32 cover 32-bit Intel and works for AMD 32-bit
processors.
but ia32 will just work fine on amd64 architectures.
You can decide if you want to run a 32 or 64bit Linux on amd64/emt64.
Both ways have
On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 10:33 +, Howard Young wrote:
I know of a way that maintainers could be increased substantially (I
expect hundreds to many thousands a year).
I am not sure of the specifics but I have little doubt that in the end
it would work.
It will likely take more than four
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 14:46 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le jeudi 01 mars 2007 à 14:33 +0100, Eduard Bloch a écrit :
I'm not the one who said maintainers don't admit they need help.
And I am not the one who said that Mozilla/KDE/GNOME have enough
manpower.
Who said that?
Don't
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 17:37 +0100, Sam Hocevar wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007, Ryan Murray wrote:
wiki.debian.org has been moved to a new host with lots of available
disk space, so updates should be fine now. For the first 90 minutes
after the move exim wasn't running, so updates during this
On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 16:20 +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
That said, he should have just used reportbug and let the maintainers
work it out :)
s/work\ it\ out/reject\ it\/won\'t\ fix\ it/
Sorry, but when I see things like this:
On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 20:27 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
If you could also shut the fuck up, that would be even better.
I see you have a great command of the language. Really... I'd expect
nothing better. You should realize that you are just making a better and
better case for how much the
Seems I am not the only one that believes GNOME is limiting.
Linus Torvalds has submitted patches. I am betting they get ignored or
rejected with to complex for our idiot users.
Yes, Joss could you please explain this away for me?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Novell's Directory Services is a
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 10:15 +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Greg Folkert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
I am sure yoush hasn't done a thing with it, as Experimental packages
don't need to be maintained, period.
Bullshit. Experimental is a playground, not a graveyard for development
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 16:44 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 09:30:40AM -0800, a sh wrote:
hi
I want debian etch sorce code and desktop picture.
I have advertisment purppose.
if it's possible for you please sent to my mail.
thank
Your mailbox probably
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 01:30 +0300, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
Hi!
There's the following problem with the fluxbox package.
The locale in the etch distributive ia already set into UTF-8 as
default. Fluxbox has been maintaining UTF-8 for a long time.
From July in experimental/ there had
On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 15:15 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
For programming languages, I prefer the one that makes programmers
easily understand all code written by others. For desktop environments,
I prefer the one that provides the cleanest and most efficient UI. YMMV.
Wow, my extreme GNOME
On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 20:02 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 12:48:47PM -0500, Greg Folkert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 15:15 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
For programming languages, I prefer the one that makes programmers
easily understand all code
On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 19:10 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 09:15:44PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
[2] Unfortunately there was very little notice of goedel's move and it
was originally scheduled only to take a couple of days but was
unavoidably delayed by
On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 15:12 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le samedi 20 janvier 2007 à 21:32 -0500, Greg Folkert a écrit :
I have regularly had my GCONF stuff partially corrupted in any case.
Associations go away, programs crash spontaneously, I look for bugs...
find the exact same things I
On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 17:30 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le lundi 22 janvier 2007 à 09:59 -0500, Greg Folkert a écrit :
Yeap, you are right. I am dumb.
I was not sure of it, but this mail just convinced me you are.
But let me ask you this, are you telling me that I need to spend *MUCH
On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 19:32 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Oh, right. Now, you're blaming GNOME for the way Christian Marillat used
to deal with bugs. Fine.
I bow GNOME Overlord.
People who use the software and report bugs when they find some are more
likely to get support than those bashing
On Sun, 2007-01-21 at 18:06 +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 09:32:07PM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 21:16 +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 06:34:18AM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 11:51 +0100, Josselin
On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 02:50 +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 02:27:23PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
Michael Banck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well we shouldn't keep ourselves hostage of stupid upstream behaviour,
should we?
Contrary to us, GNOME (in this case RedHat)
On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 11:51 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le samedi 20 janvier 2007 à 04:30 -0500, Greg Folkert a écrit :
I would assert they are not listening to their former BIGGEST fans and
users. You can easily find droves rants/discussions of current GNOME
users very disgruntled
On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 14:13 +, Ross Burton wrote:
On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 06:34 -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
Are you telling me that these features I keep see getting removed are
*NOT* about usability for me? OK, functionality to me... Functionality
for me determines my usability. It I have
On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 21:16 +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 06:34:18AM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 11:51 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le samedi 20 janvier 2007 à 04:30 -0500, Greg Folkert a écrit :
I would assert they are not listening
On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 20:22 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 05:55:53PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 05:22:51PM +0100, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:03:15 +0100
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just FYI, I *personally* would
On Sat, 2006-12-23 at 13:38 -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
André Appel wrote:
nseepd is a shell script which prints the kb/s which are currently
beeing received and transmitted by a NIC in a direct way only using
simple shell commands. No superuser rights required. All other tools I
found
On Sat, 2006-12-09 at 08:56 +0300, Kirill A. Korinskiy wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: sxemacs
Version : 22.1.6
Upstream Author :
* URL or Web page : http://sxemacs.org/
* License : GPL
Description :
So, the old addage:
On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 22:05 +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 09:41:11PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
Loïc Minier wrote:
- goobox: gnome.org module that did not see any new upstream release
since november 2005 and seems to be completely superseded by
On Fri, 2006-11-24 at 13:12 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/24/06 11:54, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 08:25:27AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 11/24/06 06:06, Jon Dowland wrote:
I think that having the shell re-implement netcat
I was finally able to acquire an SSP Build Host for you.
If you are still interest. Please contact me.
--
greg, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For technology that is
Strong, Better, Faster: Linux
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 17:57 +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On 7/14/05, Christian Fromme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Anand Kumria wrote:
Thanks for your comments -- however I don't think anyone should be able
afraid to point out when a debian developer is obviously not able to
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 00:42 -0700, Sean Perry wrote:
I just updated to X.org. With apt. Automatically. Woohoo!! I mean full
on xserver-xorg too. I did not touch ANYTHING.
X team you rock. This is why I started using Debian 7 years ago. This is
what keeps me here.
One and only one snag.
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 21:25 +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 12:03:00PM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 17:57 +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On 7/14/05, Christian Fromme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anand Kumria wrote:
Thanks for your comments
On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 16:00 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 10:34:07AM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
I guess this can go... or be changed to not be so specific.
No, it can't go. Note that it has been changed to talk about etch, not
sarge. There's no reason to stop squashing
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 00:58 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi Aurélien,
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 10:56:51AM +0100, Aurélien Jarno wrote:
Steve Langasek a écrit :
The much larger consequence of this meeting, however, has been the
crafting of a prospective release plan for etch. The release
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 14:24 -0800, Blunt Jackson wrote:
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 19:31:20 +, Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scripsit Blunt Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As a general note, I find it annoying, frustrating, and confusing
whenever ANY debian package has a
On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 06:54 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:01:45 +1100, Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If something like this is different, then not only should Debian
supplied documentation reflect the change, but a list of differences
should appear in README.Debian.
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 20:08 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:16:24 -0500, Greg Folkert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Except I'd rather see --keepcomments as
default and changed to --removecomments. My only gripe, pretty minimal.
And fixed soon. #295735.
Wow, I didn't even
On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 20:35 +0100, Eric Lavarde wrote:
Hi,
(I assume everybody is on -devel, like I am, and as it seems the problem
sits between keyboard and chair, no bug report either).
This might very well be, as I didn't compile the kernel myself (I just
use the standard
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 16:36 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
[...let's all get along outside Debian please snippage...]
Ian Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
To: Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Ian Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 02:27 -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
Hi debianista,
after my initial work on a diagram, and the comments and the work of
madduck, I had some time to redo my diagram to produce a totally new
concept. any comment appreciated.
http://kmark.home.pipeline.com/newdebian.png
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 11:46 +0100, A Mennucc wrote:
hi
I have uploaded a new version of the 'mplayer' package for Debian,
namely version 1.0pre6-1
(Unfortunately it does not show yet in the new queue at
http://qa.debian.org/~anibal/debian-NEW.html
but it is also accessible at
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 06:52 -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 11:46 +0100, A Mennucc wrote:
hi
I have uploaded a new version of the 'mplayer' package for Debian,
namely version 1.0pre6-1
(Unfortunately it does not show yet in the new queue at
http://qa.debian.org
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 16:02 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Romain Francoise wrote:
And Debian wouldn't be fun without a few enmities, we wouldn't have great
posts like http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/07/msg01308.html or
On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 22:45 -0500, SR, ESC wrote:
good bye.
Nice of you to stop in for tea.
--
greg, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The technology that is
Stronger, better, faster: Linux
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 09:28 +, Patrick Caulfield wrote:
What with a change of circumstances and lack of time recently I don't honestly
think I'm doing a good enough job on the LVM packages, so I'm offering them up
for adoption to anyone who thinks they can do a better job.
The packages
On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 23:18 +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Greg doesn't appear to be a Debian developer so neither of this
applies. The first paragraph is good advice in general, though.
Apologies for not expounding on this point. Any further deeds done this
way, will be disclaimed that I am
On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 17:30 -0500, William Ballard wrote:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 11:28:55PM +0100, Sebastian Ley wrote:
Btw: Leaving old packages build from -source packages around would quite
well
do the trick. But I suppose W.B. wants to call more people assholes before
invoking
On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 18:46 -0500, William Ballard wrote:
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 12:32:50AM +0100, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
No, you should use module-assistant tool, which is a high level tool
If I have installed module-assistant and ndiswrapper-source and have
not installed
On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 23:54 +0100, Blade wrote:
That's the normal way. This way allows me to install dozens of
module-source packages and build module packages from them for Debian
kernels, without having to install a half GiB of additional software
that I really do not need.
What we really
On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 19:09 -0500, William Ballard wrote:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 06:55:47PM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
(c) Download and install it for you.
You're right, but there's still one problem:
It breaks first and *then* fixes it.
By the time it's broken, your old network card
On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 19:25 -0500, William Ballard wrote:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 07:13:02PM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
Fine then, don't use it. It'll pull the deps before it install the
modules and unloads them and re-loads them.
I just didn't realize this crap was so brittle.
So many
On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 10:45 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Jan 04, Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It shouldn't be forgotten that the biggest blocker after these things is
probably a general failure to actually care all that much. How many
people are actually behaving as if a
I have built this package for alpha and it does indeed work. I have
bundled it up in a tgz making it easier to D/L. But all the files are
there as well for individual inspection. Along with the md5sums
http://www.gregfolkert.net/experimental/
not an archive by any means, but available at your
On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 08:55 -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
I have built this package for alpha and it does indeed work. I have
bundled it up in a tgz making it easier to D/L. But all the files are
there as well for individual inspection. Along with the md5sums
http://www.gregfolkert.net
On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 16:17 +0100, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
Martin Schulze schreef:
Paul van der Vlis wrote:
[...]
At least that's been the case including sarge. Hence, such
a sentence would not mean anything.
I can understand something like Debian releases when it's ready, but
many
On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 14:58 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Thomas Jollans [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Well, you could argue that debian branches are not perfectly named but:
stable is best if you need *absolute* failsafety for critical jobs
testing is best if you want a stable system with
On Thu, 2004-12-09 at 21:35 -0800, Philip Miller wrote:
Greg Folkert wrote:
Many reasons people come to Debian... Distributed Binaries is not one of
them.
If you think this isn't a reason to use Debian, I, as a long-time user, will
tell you that
you're dead wrong. I use Debian because
On Fri, 2004-12-10 at 12:50 +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 12:40:29PM -0500, Ian Murdock wrote:
Let me first say unequivocally that the LCC is very interested in
getting Debian involved. The question has always been: How do we do
that?
I think there is one obvious
On Fri, 2004-12-10 at 06:31 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Thu, 2004-12-09 at 23:15 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
John Goerzen dijo [Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 09:40:51PM -0600]:
I think that tying core Debian packages to the Red Hat boat anchor is a
horrible, horrible idea.
I tend to agree
On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 19:36 -0800, Brian Nelson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 09:26:00PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 11:30 -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
On 08-Dec-04, 11:15 (CST), Luis R. Rodriguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Get off your ass.
Ah. I
The most high and most honorable Ian Murdock wrote:
Hi everyone,
Hi Back at you.
Let me first say unequivocally that the LCC is very interested in
getting Debian involved. The question has always been: How do we do
that? It's one thing for a bunch of companies that can push down
decisions
On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 10:30 +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
Lots of users are reporting that ALSA sound doesn't just work when
they install it. The cause of the problem is the fact that discover
loads OSS modules even when ALSA modules are available. This bug cannot
be worked around consistently
On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 20:19 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Oct 13, Greg Folkert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If ALSA is the preferred sound solution, then the alsa-base maintainer
should present a list in hotplug with all of the traditional oss
drivers names in a file called alsa-base. hotplug
On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 14:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To Whom It May Concern;
I'm sorry but your e mail address was added automatically to by
list and I do not know who you are?
Please advise:
Your company
What do you do?
This is a Linux Distribution Mailing List for its
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 09:14, Foster William MSgt AF/XPI-ES wrote:
Would you have a Win2K/WinXP driver? Thanks.
WILLIAM E. FOSTER
Chief, Information Technology Security
DCS/Plans and Programs
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
comm: 703 695-3539
DSN: 225-3539
Sorry this is a mailing list
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 14:17, Otto Wyss wrote:
Otto Wyss dijo:
dpkg-reconfigure alsa-modules-2.4.22-1-k6
but this doesn't show the driver list again! Okay getting dselect out,
purge the package and install it again. But now the list isn't shown
either. How do I get the driver
I have a DEC Alpha 2100 Dual Processor with 256MB Memory and ~60GB of
drives space. It currently doesn't have any OS on it (well Tru64 Runtime
Only no User licenses)
I have a 1.5MBps SDSL line with a pretty good connectivity, but is
shared with the business it would be located at.
I guess, the
On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 15:47, Greg Folkert wrote:
I have a DEC Alpha 2100 Dual Processor with 256MB Memory and ~60GB of
drives space. It currently doesn't have any OS on it (well Tru64 Runtime
Only no User licenses)
I have a 1.5MBps SDSL line with a pretty good connectivity, but is
shared
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 20:14, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 11:13:28AM -0600, Ryan Underwood wrote:
Before that realization, it seemed like the type of random cruft that
sometimes gets pulled in on dist-upgrade; a name change would help
alleviate that initial perception,
On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 04:38, Daniel Kobras wrote:
To name but a few. Just because there's little incentive to use static
linkage when building Debian packages doesn't mean that we should
deprecate it. Unless you're willing to convince the admin of the
beowulf cluster next door to install
On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 15:39, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.09.22.1207 +0200]:
Let's create a package called linux-2.4.22 or
linux-2.4.22-pure-vanilla-source-for-you-to-patch with a script which
does exactly this.
I oppose. Let's get rid of
On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 09:51, Colin Watson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 09:48:32AM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
Would it NO doubt make entirely MUCH more sense, to only have to D/L the
Source Code once.
Would it be POSSIBLE to LOSE the Zippy-style CAPITALIZATION, please?
Would
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 12:18, Joey Hess wrote:
The alpha port still has boot issues. In particular, we still lack the
source to milo. This is unresolved. Despite this, CD images are in
progress.
Which version of milo are you referring to?
I still have 0.13 through 0.27 laying around. Will that
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 13:11, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 12:49:29PM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 12:18, Joey Hess wrote:
The alpha port still has boot issues. In particular, we still lack the
source to milo. This is unresolved. Despite this, CD images
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
