On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 01:28:41PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
Joel == Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Joel It would also presumably allow you to add a filter such as
Joel don't display any bug with a dependancy on any other
Joel still-open bug; thus allowing maintainers
to potentially simplifying a large set of problems
(and no, they're more or less nothing like the ones par can solve, as for
reasons discussed earlier by the author).
--
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED
in their package is, rather than arguing
about it.)
--
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 09:25:42 -0600
Source: debpool
Binary: debpool
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.1.6
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 16:13:15 -0600
Source: debpool
Binary: debpool
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.1.5
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 17:02:43 -0600
Source: debpool
Binary: debpool
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.1.3
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 11:12:30 -0600
Source: debpool
Binary: debpool
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.1.1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 16:39:40 -0600
Source: debpool
Binary: debpool
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.1.2
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 20:54:01 -0600
Source: cronolog
Binary: cronolog
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.6.2-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 11:30:57PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 15:15, Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Anglican church is, in fact, the most likely among anyone except the
UUs to (eventually) decide that it's OK, for the same reasons that they
have (now) decided
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 12:52:00PM +0200, Kai Henningsen wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joel Baker) wrote on 17.12.03 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Since you have no idea *what* civil rights I'm claiming are denied, your
claim that I'm just imagining this denial is... well, I'll just let it
stand
/ bit, of course...)
None of this really applies to changing the Linux ports away from glibc,
of course. But such a topic doesn't really belong on debian-bsd, anyway.
--
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED],''`.
Debian GNU/NetBSD(i386) porter
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 05:21:23AM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
Scripsit Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 03:05:46PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:39, Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Imagining it? I suppose it's possible that I've
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 09:48:31AM -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Russell Coker wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 15:15, Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Anglican church is, in fact, the most likely among anyone except
the UUs to (eventually) decide that it's OK
for a FreeBSD-on-Mach port :)
--
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED],''`.
Debian GNU/NetBSD(i386) porter
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 08:50:48PM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
Scripsit Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The 'slander', if such it is (and I, obviously, don't consider it such)
is against the named set of churches, and those that follow their doctrinal
decrees
Claiming that Christians
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 10:21:24AM -0800, Nunya wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 10:41:12AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
The Christian concept of a demon is a corruption (as it were) of the Greek
concept of daemon
Basically, no arguments with what you said, except I find inconsistent
the strictures it does
about the gender of students, and what they're allowed to do.
Oh, and it wraps up some loose ends, too. Like the Master Summoner.
And no, those aren't spoilers.
--
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED],''`.
Debian GNU/NetBSD(i386) porter
letters to do
the first-letter trick, at least once per.
--
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED],''`.
Debian GNU/NetBSD(i386) porter
of a
name increases fear for the thing itself. ;-p
IOW, lighten up, people. Otherwise, we'll be referring to Debian
GNU/That Which Shall Not Be Named...
Hey, we already covered Lovecraftian names...
--
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED],''`.
Debian GNU
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 01:22:07PM -0800, Nunya wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 02:04:03PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
the fact that the original guys said it's a daemon, explicitly not a
Christian demon and here's you're saying yes it is. :-)
Er, no. I'm not. I'm saying that Christian
, it applies equally to
entities who are *not* part of that group, but exhibit the same behavior).
--
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED],''`.
Debian GNU/NetBSD(i386) porter
of which also advocate the continued
denial of civil rights as well.
It's certainly easy to *feel* like folks might just hate your beliefs,
and often you for having them, when they're willing to go that far.
--
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED],''`.
Debian GNU/NetBSD
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 07:25:11PM -0800, Nunya wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 07:56:41PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
For the record, however, if you consider saying that the lifestyle or
beliefs of someone you don't agree with are sufficient to condemn them to
an eternity of suffering as hate
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 03:05:46PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:39, Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Imagining it? I suppose it's possible that I've hallucinated the
stated positions of the Catholic, Luthern, Episopalian, Baptist, and
Mormon authorities (the latter
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 10:54:15AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
[I am not subscribed to debian-bsd.]
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 06:00:21PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
Even so, I'm amenable to anyone who can come up with names which are less
loaded to random fundamentalists, if possible
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 11:10:24AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
[I am not subscribed to debian-bsd.]
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 08:15:04AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
Actually, given that I'm a long-time and deep-seated Tolkien geek, I rather
like the notion of using the Valar - they're
don't think Branden will mind being told his dislike of
parochial religious fundamentalists is showing. I suspect he'd be proud
of it. But you'll see for yourself, soon enough.
--
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED],''`.
Debian GNU/NetBSD(i386) porter
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 08:53:18AM -0800, Nunya wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 09:31:17AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
Somehow, I don't think Branden will mind being told his dislike of
parochial religious fundamentalists is showing. I suspect he'd be proud
of it. But you'll see for yourself
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 09:59:46AM +, Will Newton wrote:
On Tuesday 16 Dec 2003 01:44, Joel Baker wrote:
Appropriate? As much as any of the Valar would be; he's certainly on the
list. But since we know of at least 4 active ports, one name isn't going to
be enough...
I would hope
Christians.
It isn't precisely sympathetic to the fallen, but it ascribes the flaw of
of overwhelming pride to both sides...
--
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED],''`.
Debian GNU/NetBSD(i386) porter
a pronounciation incorrect? The pronounciation of
the project initiator, the context, etc... ?
I'd have to say that the person who made up the term gets to decide how it
should be pronounced. Shades of the Linux pronounciation flamewars...
--
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED
but the never-to-be-
released development version. Think of it as version infinity.
And Beyond!
Sorry, it had to be said. I'll go back in my hole now.
--
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED],''`.
Debian GNU/KLNetBSD(i386) porter
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 08:57:45AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 20:02:54 -0700, Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Oddly enough, most FreeBSD sysadmins don't appear to mind doing things much
more invasive than a dist-upgrade, every six months. This has largely to do
for historical reasons, but they
seem to be a minority nowadays...)
Amusing, but I don't think so. :)
--
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED],''`.
Debian GNU/KLNetBSD(i386) porter
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 08:15:04AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 11:01:49AM +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
Of course, I don't really think we should merit religious nonsense with
the honour of giving name to the products of Debian labour anyway...
And if we do, let's
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 03:09:07PM -0500, Nathan Hawkins wrote:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 12:19:10PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
Having cheated and grabbed an online resource for it from Google, the
following possibilities show up (my apologies for the lack of accents;
I can't easily input
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 10:40:11PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 11:01:49AM +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
Branden's second proposal of using something from Pratchett did have a
nice ring to it, and then there's always the valar
suprisingly *well* communicated, compared to a lot of points in
Debian's history.
--
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED],''`.
Debian GNU/TBD**BSD(i386) porter
folks who care are very likely to consider there mere *concept* of
a 'daemon' to be anathema, evil, foul, unclean, and all sorts of other
descriptives.
(And we all know that penguins are just flat-out unnatural; I mean, c'mon.
A bird that *swims*?)
ObHumor: Yes, that was a joke. :)
--
Joel Baker
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 05:55:30PM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 09:05:39AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
Remember, these machines are, behind the archives, perhaps the most
implicity trusted machines in the entire project. Compromise the archives,
and you can
.
--
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED],''`.
Debian GNU/KLNetBSD(i386) porter
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 01:07:15AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 11:19:47AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 05:55:30PM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
Try to coordinate? When there would have been a try to cooperate by
him, I wouldn´t complain
.
We'll sort it out at some point here.
--
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED],''`.
Debian GNU/KLNetBSD(i386) porter
it below the steadily expanding history
of Debian - and the current RM's goals appear to be a strong step in that
direction).
--
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED],''`.
Debian GNU/NetBSD(i386) porter
[ If you're being impatient about resolving this, please see the bottom ]
[ of the email for an imporant bit of information... ]
[ snip ]
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 04:27:27PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 10:29:05AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote
.]
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 11:54:09AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
[I am not subscribed to debian-bsd.]
On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 04:39:47PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
On December 2nd, I was contacted by Luke Mewburn, on behalf of The NetBSD
Foundation, asking about the transition
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 07:24:29PM +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
I removed a lot of CC's, since this comment isn't relevant to the rest
of the discussion, really...
On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 04:39:47PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
[snip]
I explained that Debian GNU/KNetBSD was actually
,
rather than any antipathy towards the Debian project as a whole, or the
various BSD porting efforts under it.
--
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED],''`.
Debian GNU/KLNetBSD(i386) porter
; it keeps the bugs tied in a way that makes
the relationship clear, keeps the discussion history available, and still
allows the bugs to be seen accurately, in the places they should be, and at
severities that are accurate).
--
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED
of kernel-package, also a candidate
for renaming if it comes to pass) is arch-specific.
--
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED],''`.
Debian GNU NetBSD/i386 porter
presented with suitable evidence
or persuasive argument, but his job as ftpmaster is, in large part, to
do exactly what he did - reject package uploads that appear to have
significant problems, which can include poor packaging decisions.
--
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 09:16:09 -0600
Source: debpool
Binary: debpool
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.1.0
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 06:51:01PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
Joel Baker writes:
I'm going to gloss over the utter mistake of your first statement
I am on a dialup with a dynamic IP number: I am allowed to borrow a
number from my ISP at need. There is no IP number over which I have any
. If you don't like that, there are perfectly workable ways to
buy the ability to do what you do want, for a very reasonable price, some
of which are unlikely to ever be blocked by any local ISP you may connect
through. TANSTAAFL; the Commons has long since been paved over.
--
Joel Baker [EMAIL
.
--
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED],''`.
Debian GNU NetBSD/i386 porter
the same sorts of penalties
in spamfilters.
--
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED],''`.
Debian GNU NetBSD/i386 porter
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 04:26:35PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
Joel Baker writes:
I'm sorry, but your individual desire to be able to send mail from
anywhere on the planet, claiming to be anyone on the planet...
What makes you think I want to claim to be anyone on the planet?
I have a valid
will gain much steam
until the ASRG renders a decision. So we'll just have to see what comes out
of it.
--
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED],''`.
Debian GNU NetBSD/i386 porter
a bug (usually in the toolchain), and there
should be human intervention if for no other reason than ensuring the
toolchain packages get the bug filed against them so that we can improve
them.
--
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED],''`.
Debian GNU NetBSD/i386
wrong result in my script.
Presumably you mean other than `dpkg --compare-versions`?
--
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED],''`.
Debian GNU NetBSD/i386 porter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 22:16:26 -0600
Source: fortunes-debian-hints
Binary: fortunes-debian-hints
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joel Baker
() for
cancellation. But a thread waiting on pthread_cond_timedwait() doesn`t
cancel and so pthread_join() doesn`t return.
Further discussion probably isn't on-topic for debian-devel, however,
unless you're talking about building a Debian package...
--
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED
it as an option for maintainer scripts.
--
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED],''`.
Debian GNU NetBSD/i386 porter
in the proposed mini-policy for NetBSD kernels...)
--
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED],''`.
Debian GNU NetBSD/i386 porter
Library, or somesuch.
As for benefits... try real POSIX threading, doesn't choke and die on
large numbers of threads, and brings Linux remotely close to most of the
rest of the world in terms of threading...
Now to get NetBSD to release 2.0 :)
--
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED
soon. :)
--
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED],''`.
Debian GNU NetBSD/i386 porter
of them
now (or, rather, as we run across bits of them that need discussion).
--
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED],''`.
Debian GNU NetBSD/i386 porter
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 07:37:12PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Joel Baker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
This argument would carry more weight with me if it were possible to either
A) test the upload *completely* before making it (IE, catch all possible
FTBFS bugs or other quirks that happen
been claimed for
some time (I've been waiting on getting someone from the mips folks to get
in touch about testing it on that platform, for the *other* RC bug, before
uploading the fix).
--
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED],''`.
Debian GNU NetBSD/i386 porter
bothering to
have BSPs every weekend, and a 0-day NMU test?
--
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED],''`.
Debian GNU NetBSD/i386 porter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 15:58:59 -0600
Source: diasce2
Binary: diasce2
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.3.1-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joel Baker [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 13:34:26 -0600
Source: mysql++
Binary: libsqlplus1 libsqlplus-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.7.9.sp1-2.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stephan A Suerken [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 17:49:54 -0600
Source: legos
Binary: legos
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.2.6-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stephen M Moraco [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 11:27:58 -0600
Source: zmailer
Binary: zmailer
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.99.55-3.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Hector Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 23:00:34 -0600
Source: mps
Binary: mps
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.1-2.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Viral Shah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 23:59:14 -0600
Source: pvm
Binary: pvm pvm-dev libpvm3
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.4.2-8.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Drake Diedrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joel Baker [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 11:58:16 -0600
Source: zhcon
Binary: zhcon
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:0.2.3-6.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Yu Guanghui [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED
-vorbis libclanlib-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 0.6.5-1-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Filip Van Raemdonck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
clanlib-doc - Reference documentation and tutorials for ClanLib
clanlib-examples
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 23:29:36 -0600
Source: rust
Binary: rust
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.1-8-2.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Mateusz Papiernik (Mati) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 10:01:51 -0600
Source: nte
Binary: nte
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.3-3.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Alex Romosan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 10:36:03 -0600
Source: ccache
Binary: ccache
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.2-2.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Paul Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 10:53:28 -0600
Source: tcl-sql
Binary: tcl-sql
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2621-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Avery Pennarun [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 22:18:47 -0600
Source: xosview
Binary: xosview
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.8.0-5.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Zed Pobre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 00:58:45 -0600
Source: word2x
Binary: word2x
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:0.005-4.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Matthew Vernon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED
entertaining :)
--
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED],''`.
Debian GNU NetBSD/i386 porter
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 09:16:03AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 10:38:10PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
If they get hit by a bus, reassigned by their job to Outer Mongolia, or
just plain get bored with doing it, we lose that benefit entirely, as
things stand today
this all along, but frankly, porting work took priority when there was no
release goal :)
--
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED],''`.
Debian GNU NetBSD/i386 porter
use, available.
So tell us - why *do* people write free software?
--
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED],''`.
Debian GNU NetBSD/i386 porter
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 05:59:52PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 10:32:07AM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
* want to contribute something to a project they respect
* want to help out Debian users
* want to help promote the goals of Debian
These are bad reasons
-* packages will be free and clear*
Only 10,000 files now... (hey, it *was* 15,000).
--
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpue2Q7xC6Kw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 08:05:01AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Hi, Joel Baker wrote:
Diesel locomotives are a giant diesel generator hooked up to electric
traction motors, running through the switchbox at something like 600v
(I haven't read the specs in a while, this might be off
, a sane default of not being
sgid, and assuming packages used something proper (er, dpkg-statoverride?)
to register the sgid bit, it doesn't matter if you blow away the answer
cache - you can look at the existing state and find out what you need to
know (or, presumably, override it).
--
Joel Baker
they call popping the coupling seals on that line (the
fail-safe (full stop) airbrake line) completely (rather than bleeding the
air off) 'dynamiting'...
--
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpRKx4EOtwNp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
to which it
might be applicable.)
--
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpUFz9MND4T9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 22:44:10 -0600
Source: cronolog
Binary: cronolog
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.6.2-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED
that, or people who
actually want /tmp when they explicitly request it, even if TMPDIR=~/tmp is
fine most of the time.
I can't think of a better way to get admins to simply turn it off
completely than to make it completely override /tmp and have no good way
around that.
--
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 14:04:50 -0600
Source: fortunes-debian-hints
Binary: fortunes-debian-hints
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joel Baker
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-09
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: debpool
* Version: 0.1.0
Upstream Author: Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL: N/A
License: BSD
Description: pool-based DEB package archiver
DebPool is a pool-based DEB package archiver designed
close to?) working amd64 port (recently
renamed).
--
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpllBGNSltA2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
