-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 16:48:04 +0300
Source: warzone2100
Binary: warzone2100 warzone2100-data
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.1.0~0.svn1436-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Games Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nico Golde wrote:
I don't really have a better section proposal but I don't
really think it fits there because I would not search for a
general user tool in a section for root tools. Also the
The definition of System/Administration is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Russ Allbery wrote:
I was looking at the new menu structure to adopt it into my package,
fbpanel[1], that before it was in Apps/Tools. Now this section is been
removed and there's nothing else like this.
I don't see an obvious place for this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Darren Salt wrote:
What would actually be useful is for packages which provide lots of menu
entries to use their own submenus. sgt-puzzles, which provides 27, is one
such; with several other entries in Games/Puzzles, it gets a bit long...
If you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Russ Allbery wrote:
What about System/Administration? It fits there because a) it changes
the way your desktop environment behaves, and b) you would usually only
start it once per session.
This isn't horrible, but I don't think it's a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2007 23:15:21 +0300
Source: qemu-launcher
Binary: qemu-launcher
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.7.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Linas Žvirblis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Linas Žvirblis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 12:43:25 +0200
Source: qemu-launcher
Binary: qemu-launcher
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.8.0~pre0-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Linas Žvirblis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Linas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 02:13:14 +0200
Source: qemu-launcher
Binary: qemu-launcher
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.7.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Linas Žvirblis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Linas Žvirblis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 21:27:24 +0200
Source: qemu-launcher
Binary: qemu-launcher
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.7.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Linas Žvirblis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Linas Žvirblis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:53:22 +0300
Source: qemu-launcher
Binary: qemu-launcher
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.7.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Linas Žvirblis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Linas Žvirblis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 15:30:41 +0300
Source: qemu-launcher
Binary: qemu-launcher
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.7.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Linas Žvirblis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Linas Žvirblis
Loïc Minier wrote:
Would be nice if we could go as far as shipping binary packages for
e.g. vmware-player, as Ubuntu does:
Oh come one guys. So instead of providing QEMU + QEMU Acclerator, a
partially free solution, we just go for totally non-free one? VMware was
not an option when there
Adrian von Bidder wrote:
vmware
QEMU:
* is quite fast
Quite fast with the accelerator module. There is also full
virtualization mode, that can be used with certain operating systems.
* does suspend/resume quite beautifully
It can save memory state and load it later on startup.
* the
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
maybe not with a so nice UI than vmware, but that is definitely
writeable IMHO.
That is being worked on as I type this.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joerg Schilling wrote:
The Debian project accepted the clauses in cdrecord ~ 4 years ago.
That doesn't mean the project still considers them acceptable *NOW*.
So you like to tell me that Debian is not trustworthy?
The requirements of the project changed. That is called progress.
--
To
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 20:01:28 +0300
Source: qemu-launcher
Binary: qemu-launcher
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.7.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Linas Žvirblis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Linas Žvirblis
Amaya wrote:
Huge Troll Warning
I do not think the person is trolling. I think she simply has no idea on
how Debian (and Ubuntu for that matter) works. But I will restrain
myself from answering this message, as it is nearly impossible to
explain things to someone that does not want to listen.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 20:26:34 +0300
Source: qemu-launcher
Binary: qemu-launcher
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.6.99.svn81-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Linas Žvirblis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Linas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 18:12:13 +0300
Source: qemu-launcher
Binary: qemu-launcher
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.6.99.svn66-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Linas Žvirblis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Linas
Osamu Aoki wrote:
But when this happens on stable, I feel not kind to mark those bug
report as wontfix. In many cases, it is FAQ and the answer is hidden
under obscure location. I am not native speaker of English but the word
wontfix certainly makes me think of ... I do not give a d--m.
Mike Hommey wrote:
Could you tell us what kind of harm can do a hidden empty file in /usr ?
First of all, false positives in rootkit and security scanners. And too
many false positives lead to false negatives sooner or later.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Mike Hommey wrote:
It'd be easier to take your claim into account if you actually brought
better facts than I don't like it or stupid tools give false positives
Let us imagine someone decides to introduce package X that contains a
lot of files (let us say 50) in /usr/lib and half of them are
Mike Hommey wrote:
Here, we are talking about the empty file /usr/lib/xulrunner/.autoreg...
Are you saying it is fine for empty files? So what about
/usr/lib/kaffe/.system (a symlink to directory) or
/usr/lib/jvm/.java-gcj.jinfo (non-empty file)?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul Johnson wrote:
See, if you visit a bazaar, I bet a helpful guy with a Russian accent
can sell you a perfectly valid passport for less than $50. Several
years ago, a friend of mine actually asked someone at the Stadion
10-lecia in Warsaw, and was led to a guy with a number of blank
Joey Hess wrote:
By this lie of reasoning the only task that Debian can afford to ship is
either KDE or Gnome.
No, not at all. That is not what I was trying to say. KDE and GNOME were
examples of something that did not happen overnight. They proved worthy
of becoming a task. Would you accept
Thiemo Seufer wrote:
A XFCE-based lightweight desktop also isn't something which happened
overnight.
As in xfce4 package, sure. But all the additional applications are
something to be considered very carefully.
It's the usual thing I install as desktop environment, and
I appreciate that it
Christian Perrier wrote:
Well, I haven't followed the rest of the thread (the part where people
wonder which package could pertain to a Light desktop task) but I've
seen Joey suggest himself to turn it into a task.
So have I. But I am against it nevertheless.
Do not get me wrong. I am not
Christian Perrier wrote:
Joey often raised an argument about novice users likely to be confused
by a KDE/Gnome choice, not knowing the difference between both.
That is undoubtedly true for novice (as in first time) users, but we
should realize that there is a large group of users that are
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Is there a problem with using Amateur (Ham) Radio?
It is unnecessarily complicated.
[...]
Since when has dumbing down debian been a goal?
It is not about dumbing down Debian. It is about not having dumb names
for menu sections.
First of all, Ham is not a word,
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
Not only too long but completely wrong.
Yeah, I seem to be confusing things. Sorry for that.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Amateur radio is the dumb name, for people who are confused by
what the practioners call it -- HAM radio.
It is translated as amateur radio to some languages. Others translate
it entirely to something specific to that language. And some use HAM.
Can you claim
Frank Küster wrote:
Not only that, but Evince can be quite slow at rendering complex documents.
Are there any benchmarks on that? poppler (on which evince is based)
aims to be better than xpdf in that, but it seems some of the additional
functions have slowed it down. The poppler people
Joey Hess wrote:
If so, I would be happy to add this to tasksel, so that the desktop task
automatically installs it if it detects a system that is not easily
capable of running kde/gnome. Tasksel has the infrastructure needed to
support doing this kind of thing, just a matter of finding
Miles Bader wrote:
- evince
Any particular reason for not just using xpdf?
Especially since xpdf seems to do a much better job of rendering many
pdf documents... [Evince has nicer looking widgets though.]
Not only that, but Evince can be quite slow at rendering complex documents.
Of
Eduard Bloch wrote:
Yep. WRT you said above, what abot renaming WindowManagers/Modules to
$wm Modules (one level above WM starters and indicating which
modules are meant by that).
One more thing to consider is that if we will have to to move/rename
modules in the future (current situation is
35 matches
Mail list logo
