Accepted usbmount 0.0.14.1 (source all)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 12:42:44 +0100 Source: usbmount Binary: usbmount Architecture: source all Version: 0.0.14.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Martin Dickopp [EMAIL

Accepted usbmount 0.0.14 (all source)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 22:17:00 +0200 Source: usbmount Binary: usbmount Architecture: source all Version: 0.0.14 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Martin Dickopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Martin Dickopp [EMAIL PROTECTED

Accepted usbmount 0.0.13 (all source)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 19:22:10 +0200 Source: usbmount Binary: usbmount Architecture: source all Version: 0.0.13 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Martin Dickopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Martin Dickopp [EMAIL

Accepted usbmount 0.0.12 (all source)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 19:11:44 +0200 Source: usbmount Binary: usbmount Architecture: source all Version: 0.0.12 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Martin Dickopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Martin Dickopp [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Announcing a new book: The Debian System -- Concepts and Techniques

martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I am pleased to announce the availability of my new (English) book The Debian System, Congratulations, I'll order a copy soon! :) The hardcover edition will be available in stores in the beginning of July. A list of online shops stocking it is kept

Re: /usr/lib vs /usr/libexec

Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 02:03:01PM -0300, Humberto Massa

Re: /usr/lib vs /usr/libexec

Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It seems that Red Hat has a lot of programs under /usr/libexec that are under /usr/lib in Debian. One example is /usr/lib/postfix vs /usr/libexec/postfix. It seems to me that /usr/libexec is a better name for such things, I disagree. Why is it

Re: /usr/lib vs /usr/libexec

Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Martin Dickopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It seems that Red Hat has a lot of programs under /usr/libexec that are under /usr/lib in Debian. One example is /usr/lib/postfix vs /usr/libexec/postfix. It seems to me that /usr/libexec is a better

Re: /usr/lib vs /usr/libexec

Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If there is a reason to separate /usr from / (which so many people think there is, though I don't understand why, since it has no semantic significance at all), why separate /lib from /etc? I don't see a semantic difference between /bin and

Re: /usr/lib vs /usr/libexec

Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Martin Dickopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If there is a reason to separate /usr from / (which so many people think there is, though I don't understand why, since it has no semantic significance

Accepted usbmount 0.0.11 (all source)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 14:19:15 +0200 Source: usbmount Binary: usbmount Architecture: source all Version: 0.0.11 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Martin Dickopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Martin Dickopp [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Bug#271428: mapping unknown timezones

martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Sending to debian-devel because I would like to hear other people's opinions. It's about #271428, as the subject says. Please keep [EMAIL PROTECTED] on CC (I assume GOTO reads -devel). also sprach GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.04.16.1421

Re: Bug#271428: mapping unknown timezones

martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: also sprach Martin Dickopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.04.16.1552 +0200]: Therefore, any actual behavior (including the existing one as well as the suggested alternatives) would be standard conforming. I don't think I was criticising standards compliance

Accepted usbmount 0.0.10 (all source)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 17:45:51 +0200 Source: usbmount Binary: usbmount Architecture: source all Version: 0.0.10 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Martin Dickopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Martin Dickopp [EMAIL PROTECTED

Accepted usbmount 0.0.9 (all source)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 23:54:53 +0200 Source: usbmount Binary: usbmount Architecture: source all Version: 0.0.9 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Martin Dickopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Martin Dickopp [EMAIL PROTECTED

Accepted usbmount 0.0.7 (all source)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 14:10:34 +0100 Source: usbmount Binary: usbmount Architecture: source all Version: 0.0.7 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Martin Dickopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Martin Dickopp [EMAIL PROTECTED

Accepted usbmount 0.0.8 (all source)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 23:40:25 +0200 Source: usbmount Binary: usbmount Architecture: source all Version: 0.0.8 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Martin Dickopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Martin Dickopp [EMAIL PROTECTED

usbmount: udev script to automatically (un)mount USB mass storage devices: include in Debian?

Hello, I have written and packaged a script to automatically mount and unmount USB mass storage devices (e.g. USB memory pens) when they are plugged in or removed. The script is invoked by udev. To solicit opinions, I posted about it to debian-mentors list last October: