Simon McVittie debian.org> writes:
> I personally think those factors undermine the "/ as recovery" use-case
> so far that the advantages of a merged /usr far outweigh it.
User side note: If people would like to help the recovery use case,
grml-rescueboot is already packaged which adds grub
Steve McIntyre steve at einval.com writes:
Pros:
* CD#1 will work again without size worries
* Smaller, simpler desktop
* Works well/better on all supported kernels (?)
* Does not depend on replacing init
Cons:
* please fill in here
IMHO you forgot the crucial part here - why
Thorsten Glaser tg at mirbsd.de writes:
• Your primary use case appears to be “the desktop”, whereas Debian, as
opposed to some of its downstreams and Pure Blends, is a Universal OS,
which means it’s got much more servers in use, which don’t benefit from
systemd either at all or at least
Steve Langasek vorlon at debian.org writes:
Sorry you ran into trouble with upstart.
Not a DD, just a happy Debian user, hope you'll excuse me, but on the topic
of Upstart, I have some technical comments on why, surprisingly, I think it
may not be mature enough yet.
A couple of years ago I was
Dmitrijs Ledkovs xnox at debian.org writes:
Also on technical merits although more philosophically, with Upstart you're
expressing yourself in an event-based DSL rather than writing configuration
files. It's pretty generic. But unfortunately, that means it's also not
entirely straightforward,
5 matches
Mail list logo
