-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:28:32 +0100
Source: valgrind
Binary: valgrind
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1:3.7.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pierre Habouzit madco...@debian.org
Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit madco
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:16:17 +0100
Source: valgrind
Binary: valgrind
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1:3.7.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Andrés Roldán arol...@debian.org
Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit madco
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 16:28:29 +0100
Source: valgrind
Binary: valgrind
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1:3.7.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Andrés Roldán arol...@debian.org
Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit madco
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 08:18:11 +0100
Source: proxsmtp
Binary: proxsmtp
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.10-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pierre Habouzit madco...@debian.org
Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit madco
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2011 23:14:32 +0200
Source: valgrind
Binary: valgrind
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1:3.6.99svn12003-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Andrés Roldán arol...@debian.org
Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 16:00:59 +0200
Source: valgrind
Binary: valgrind
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1:3.6.1-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Andrés Roldán arol...@debian.org
Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit madco
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 08:47:28 +0200
Source: valgrind
Binary: valgrind
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1:3.6.99svn11761-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Andrés Roldán arol...@debian.org
Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 13:35:29 +0200
Source: valgrind
Binary: valgrind
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1:3.6.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Andrés Roldán arol...@debian.org
Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit madco
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 19:44:22 +0200
Source: valgrind
Binary: valgrind
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1:3.6.1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Andrés Roldán arol...@debian.org
Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit madco
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 23:12:23 +0200
Source: valgrind
Binary: valgrind
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1:3.6.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Andrés Roldán arol...@debian.org
Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit madco
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 22:55:27 +0200
Source: valgrind
Binary: valgrind
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1:3.6.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Andrés Roldán arol...@debian.org
Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit madco
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 07 May 2011 16:26:29 +0200
Source: sparse
Binary: sparse
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.4.3+20110419-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pierre Habouzit madco...@debian.org
Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit madco
. Sounds better than over engineering.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··Omadco...@debian.org
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 09:07:28AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 08:58:31AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 05/05/11 at 08:51 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le jeudi 05 mai 2011 à 08:23 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
Could you please give a concrete example
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 09:56:03AM +0200, sean finney wrote:
Maybe valgrind already does checks like this [...]
It does.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··Omadco...@debian.org
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 06:51:35PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Pierre Habouzit madco...@madism.org writes:
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 10:19:45PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mercredi 04 mai 2011 à 22:12 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
While I like the idea in general, I think
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 12:51:33AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Pierre Habouzit madco...@madism.org writes:
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 06:51:35PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Pierre Habouzit madco...@madism.org writes:
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 10:19:45PM +0200, Josselin
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 07:48:45PM +0200, Carsten Hey wrote:
* Pierre Habouzit [2011-05-05 07:46 +0200]:
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 10:48:46PM +0200, Carsten Hey wrote:
If more new upstream versions are uploaded to unstable (because they are
targeted at rolling), it raises the number of RC
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 04:49:42PM +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 01:31:24PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 11:41:35AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
It is clear from the discussion that there would be consequences. Some
would be negative, some
. But it
doesn't make those users worthless to the release team, quite the
contrary.
It could even turn-up to become a useful release tool.
I just love that proposal. At least something technical that makes
sense, thanks Joss.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O
point for rolling is clearly just unstable + a force
hint. Why would you need to upload something to rolling that you
couldn't make enter through unstable?
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··Omadco...@debian.org
OOO
versionned, for the rolling case one may want to have looser
way to express force hints (with version ranges e.g.), but that should't
be really hard.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··Omadco...@debian.org
OOOhttp
be limited to people with a key in
the keyring.
Though we should make the software available for people to build their
own PPA infrastructure easily.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··Omadco...@debian.org
OOOhttp
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 10:48:46PM +0200, Carsten Hey wrote:
* Pierre Habouzit [2011-05-04 22:23 +0200]:
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 10:19:45PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mercredi 04 mai 2011 à 22:12 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
While I like the idea in general, I think
RT
Member saying that he would even consider help a Rolling Team as he's
already doing that pinning on his workstation…)
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··Omadco...@debian.org
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
tried.
Just to say that your bipartisan view is a tad simplistic :)
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··Omadco...@debian.org
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 02:42:26PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 03/05/11 at 13:31 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
I've suggested integrating aptosid (or $derivative) people inside of
Debian as a way to provide rolling, I know that Joss did so on planet
too e.g. That has two very important
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 03:05:34PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 02:42:26PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
It's not as simple as let's integrate aptosid. There are at least two
sides to this:
- integrate the developers community in Debian. They are probably very
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 03:17:18PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 03/05/11 at 15:05 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
aptosid is just an example, I don't even know the distro, they may not
be the best choice, I just try to find alternates ideas. Note that I
don't think it takes more than 10
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 01:56:14AM +0200, Carsten Hey wrote:
* Pierre Habouzit [2011-05-01 23:17 +0200]:
The problem is, you need to entry points, one for testing as we know it,
one for rolling.
Actually, we need two entry points each, a default one and an
exceptional one. The latter
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 12:10:42AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 01/05/11 at 23:46 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Benefits for Debian:
- attract users who think that testing is only a development branch, and
want newer software than what one finds in stable. Those users
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 09:13:31AM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Hai!
Pierre Habouzit madco...@madism.org writes:
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 12:28:06PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Size is just one ingredient. There are plenty of other ways to diminish
barrier to deploy big
people get demotivated, and that the last rush is mostly done by very
few people.
Doing that will make them feel even more alone, which is a great way to
burn them out even faster. I really don't like it. I'd rather see ways
on how to make the freeze shorter been explored instead.
--
·O· Pierre
it's a huge no-go for the release team.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··Omadco...@debian.org
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
this extra work, then it means you'll make people do both, and they are
already overwhelmed with their current work.
Plus it splits the user base. It's all in the end of lucas mail FWIW.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··Omadco...@debian.org
OOO
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 05:36:34PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 11:00:58PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
First of all I think you should concede that the exercise you're asking
us to do cannot be done as easily as you did yours.
I don't concede that. I've read
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 11:24:41PM -0700, Ludovico Cavedon wrote:
On 04/30/2011 04:32 PM, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
FWIW I think that rolling or CUT miss the point entirely. As a
Debian user I use stable on my servers (with a few backports for the 3-4
things I need bleeding edge for). For my
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 08:38:55AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 01:32:19AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
FWIW I think that rolling or CUT miss the point entirely. As a
Debian user I use stable on my servers (with a few backports for the 3-4
things I need bleeding edge
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 11:22:51AM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Du, 01 mai 11, 09:57:50, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
I think we'd like people running unstable stick with testing when we
freeze, that makes sense, yes.
This doesn't make sense to me, why would I want to downgrade to
testing
that, you know, people know you're
trying to trick them and it doesn't work anymore. I've two children,
I can tell.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··Omadco...@debian.org
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 08:02:51PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 01/05/11 at 18:38 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
You're saying:
Problem:
I acknowledge that people are not interested in stable releases
enough and that the RT has to compensate all the time.
Those two
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 09:43:51PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 08:55:25PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
(1) you'll split the userbase, some of the users will use rolling
instead of testing, and during the freeze we're very interested
about our users
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 04:01:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
FWIW I think that rolling or CUT miss the point entirely. As a
Debian user I use stable on my servers (with a few backports for the 3-4
things I need bleeding edge for). For my desktop I use unstable
, please, at least not in the Debian sense).
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··Omadco...@debian.org
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 04:26:57PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Who are they? Unlike this constant handwaving, I've shared my experience
^^^
If you feel that my contributions and experience in Debian consist of
constant handwaving
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 10:36:07PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 01/05/11 at 22:17 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 09:35:07PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
[ Note that my position is based on the assumption that we have a
share of DDs interested in rolling similar
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 10:41:07PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 10:08:46PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Those are real users from real life. I'm not saying we-re
representative of a majority of Debian Users, but unlike all the
handwaived users we've read about
it, maybe there will be better answers that don't make
releasing even more brittle and burn even more people out.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··Omadco...@debian.org
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 11:39:47PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 01/05/11 at 22:48 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 10:36:07PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
It's clear that we are not going to stop doing stable releases anytime
soon. However, there seem to be some
and actually lose users: it's a lose-lose scenario on the long
term.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··Omadco...@debian.org
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ
as there
is enough acked-by for them… to enforce a minimal level of
peer-review, so that quality is checked, and relax all the conditions
to perform NMUs at once ]
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··Omadco...@debian.org
OOO
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 09:49:14 +0100
Source: dumpasn1
Binary: dumpasn1
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 20101112-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pierre Habouzit madco...@debian.org
Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit madco
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 10:15:40 +0100
Source: proxsmtp
Binary: proxsmtp
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.9-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pierre Habouzit madco...@debian.org
Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit madco
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 20:26:16 +0100
Source: sparse
Binary: sparse
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.4.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pierre Habouzit madco...@debian.org
Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit madco
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 23:04:43 +0100
Source: proxsmtp
Binary: proxsmtp
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.9-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pierre Habouzit madco...@debian.org
Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit madco
mussh will use ssh-agent and RSA/DSA keys to minimize
the need to enter your password more than once.
how is that different to dsh, already present in Debian?
Or clusterssh ?
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··Omadco...@debian.org
OOO
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 11:15:50 +0200
Source: apt-listchanges
Binary: apt-listchanges
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.85.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pierre Habouzit madco...@debian.org
Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 03:28:00PM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
Pierre Habouzit madco...@madism.org writes:
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 10:42:55AM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
2) http proxy servers cannot always process pipelined requests due to
the complexity this adds (complexity is always bad
, but disabling it by default is wrong.
Pipelining is defined in the RFC since the nineties ffs...
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··Omadco...@debian.org
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
: low
Maintainer: Pierre Habouzit madco...@debian.org
Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit madco...@debian.org
Description:
libtokyocabinet-dbg - Tokyo Cabinet Database Libraries [runtime]
libtokyocabinet-dev - Tokyo Cabinet Database Libraries [development]
libtokyocabinet8 - Tokyo Cabinet Database
: high
Maintainer: Pierre Habouzit madco...@debian.org
Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit madco...@debian.org
Description:
libtokyocabinet-dbg - Tokyo Cabinet Database Libraries [runtime]
libtokyocabinet-dev - Tokyo Cabinet Database Libraries [development]
libtokyocabinet8 - Tokyo Cabinet Database
: high
Maintainer: Pierre Habouzit madco...@debian.org
Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit madco...@debian.org
Description:
libtokyocabinet-dbg - Tokyo Cabinet Database Libraries [runtime]
libtokyocabinet-dev - Tokyo Cabinet Database Libraries [development]
libtokyocabinet8 - Tokyo Cabinet Database
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 21:45:02 +0100
Source: nsd3
Binary: nsd3
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 3.2.3-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pierre Habouzit madco...@debian.org
Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit madco...@debian.org
: low
Maintainer: Pierre Habouzit madco...@debian.org
Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit madco...@debian.org
Description:
libtokyocabinet-dbg - Tokyo Cabinet Database Libraries [runtime]
libtokyocabinet-dev - Tokyo Cabinet Database Libraries [development]
libtokyocabinet8 - Tokyo Cabinet Database
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:12:27 +0100
Source: nsd3
Binary: nsd3
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 3.2.3-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pierre Habouzit madco...@debian.org
Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit madco...@debian.org
]
For all I care you cannot exploit this bug, unless you can make the nsd
user write symlink to files there. If this is asking for trouble, and my
next upload is going to fix that, it's not really worth the fuss about
cc-ing d...@...
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O
: low
Maintainer: Pierre Habouzit madco...@debian.org
Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit madco...@debian.org
Description:
libtokyocabinet-dbg - Tokyo Cabinet Database Libraries [runtime]
libtokyocabinet-dev - Tokyo Cabinet Database Libraries [development]
libtokyocabinet8 - Tokyo Cabinet Database
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 16:41:39 +0100
Source: proxsmtp
Binary: proxsmtp
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.8-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pierre Habouzit madco...@debian.org
Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit madco
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 18:03:20 +0100
Source: nsd3
Binary: nsd3
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 3.2.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pierre Habouzit madco...@debian.org
Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit madco...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:27:49 +0100
Source: nsd3
Binary: nsd3
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 3.2.3-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pierre Habouzit madco...@debian.org
Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit madco...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 22:42:50 +0200
Source: vimperator
Binary: iceweasel-vimperator
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Pierre Habouzit madco...@debian.org
Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 03:00:54PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 07:40:28PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 07:20:40PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 02:32:51PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Pierre Habouzit (madco
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 06:16:52PM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
On lördagen den 19 september 2009, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
There is one point in having the transitional package: it ensures that
no package does try to take foo as a package name in $stable + 1 which
would then in turn confuse
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 11:47:35AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 01:08:12AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 12:04:32AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
Dear developers,
There is a new version of libjpeg in the archive (JPEG7
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 01:01:38PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 11:47:35AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 01:08:12AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 12:04:32AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
Dear developers
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 02:32:51PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Pierre Habouzit (madco...@madism.org) [090919 01:08]:
I'll put blocks in my hint file to be sure that both those packages will
migrate in testing together (I'm unsure if britney is clever enough to
block them until all
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 07:20:40PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 02:32:51PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Pierre Habouzit (madco...@madism.org) [090919 01:08]:
I'll put blocks in my hint file to be sure that both those packages will
migrate in testing together (I'm
for each package install, dpkg would have to
wonder if anything supersedes it, and deal with all the issues that
would arise if _two_ binary packages Supersedes the same thing.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··Omadco...@debian.org
OOO
, I'll let luk
or other RA/RM check if now is the best moment to do so.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··Omadco...@debian.org
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
.
Not the reverse. This is a major (if not _THE_ major) annoyance with the
BTS. FWIW this is a long discussed issue, and the BTS maintainers do not
share this opinion (that mailing @ should also mail the submitter)
so we're basically stuck.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 05:23:32PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 05:08:00PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
When the maintainer think the bug reporter is not to be annoyed, then he
should mail nnn-silent or whatever, because that is the exception.
Full ACK
have a
--do-not-subscribe-me-to-bugs--I-mean-it--I-really-want-to-be-a-PITA-for-the-maintainer
for people that never remember about the pseudo-header.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··Omadco...@debian.org
OOO
direction.
He's annoyed I sent that mail so late (and FWIW sorry but I hadn't the
time to do it before, and when I had time in august I hadn't
connectivity.. but whatever) but I think the proposal will be amended so
that we're compatible.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O
for lots
of time. At best compatibility layers, and worst case, pure duplication
of all APIs.
symbol versioning is really nice, but it's not magic either ;)
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··Omadco...@debian.org
OOO
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 03:23:50PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 7:53 AM, Pierre Habouzit madco...@madism.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 10:30:14PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Anyway, I'd rather wait some time until people have tried using this
format before deciding
for them, so you'll instead probably see
quite a fast adopting rate for DEP3...
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··Omadco...@debian.org
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
the patch from, they'll probably do it (I would at least). If
you ask to rewrite the full stuff, then really, go to hell will
probably be the (sane) answer you'll get.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··Omadco...@debian.org
OOO
for Linux we want some kind of sysvinit like
scripts anyways.
--
Intersec http://www.intersec.com
Pierre Habouzit pierre.habou...@intersec.com
Tél : +33 (0)1 5570 3346
Mob : +33 (0)6 1636 8131
Fax : +33 (0)1 5570 3332
37 Rue Pierre Lhomme
92400 Courbevoie
signature.asc
Description: Digital
...@debian.org Sat, 05 Sep 2009 12:15:46 -0500
Isn't it a duplicate of #543420 where the maintainer claims upstream
doesn't want such a patch ?
--
Intersec http://www.intersec.com
Pierre Habouzit pierre.habou...@intersec.com
Tél : +33 (0)1 5570 3346
Mob : +33 (0)6 1636 8131
Fax : +33 (0)1 5570 3332
37 Rue
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 10:52:22AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 06:40:44PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 12:04:33PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Sep 06, Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org wrote:
When should maintainers start adding
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 00:21:05 +0200
Source: nsd3
Binary: nsd3
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 3.2.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pierre Habouzit madco...@debian.org
Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit madco...@debian.org
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 06:04:34PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
retitle 485330 Allow context diff in debian/patches/ in 3.0 (quilt) format
thanks
On Thu, 06 Aug 2009, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
That said, yes, using non-unified diff is as laughable as using RCS or
SCCS nowadays. Though I
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 04:12:35PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Pierre Habouzit madco...@madism.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 10:45:14AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 09:26:02AM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
(filterdiff comes with patchutils.) Given
://www.intersec.com
Pierre Habouzit pierre.habou...@intersec.com
Tél : +33 (0)1 5570 3346
Mob : +33 (0)6 1636 8131
Fax : +33 (0)1 5570 3332
37 Rue Pierre Lhomme
92400 Courbevoie
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
-tuti
+tutu
titi
Cheers,
--
Intersec http://www.intersec.com
Pierre Habouzit pierre.habou...@intersec.com
Tél : +33 (0)1 5570 3346
Mob : +33 (0)6 1636 8131
Fax : +33 (0)1 5570 3332
37 Rue Pierre Lhomme
92400 Courbevoie
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 06:33:28PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Those are actually valid ed scripts IIRC.
Okay, sorry, I meant to remove that sentence that is actually wrong...
sorry 'bout that.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··Omadco...@debian.org
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 09:56:00PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 04:02:43PM +0200, Éric Seigne wrote:
Bonjour,
es-ce qu'il existe une commande rapide et efficace pour faire le
ménage dans un dossier plein de paquets .deb pour ne garder que ceux
dont les numéros de
can probably work it around with proper -x
arguments (ugly).
--
Intersec http://www.intersec.com
Pierre Habouzit pierre.habou...@intersec.com
Tél : +33 (0)1 5570 3346
Mob : +33 (0)6 1636 8131
Fax : +33 (0)1 5570 3332
37 Rue Pierre Lhomme
92400 Courbevoie
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 03:53:58PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 11:01:21PM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
Hello
To help packages like Apache which have some parts like libaprutil
that wants to link against libmysqlclient16_r.so and some like PHP
that wants
be a forward to running
apt-get inside that chroot;
- find a way to let the user run commands from that chroot seamlessly.
That would be totally acceptable, and probably an improvement over the
current situation.
--
Intersec http://www.intersec.com
Pierre Habouzit pierre.habou...@intersec.com
1 - 100 of 1149 matches
Mail list logo
