Re: DebConf22 registration and call for proposals are open!

Literally search on your favourite search engine: how to unsubscribe from In this case, debconf-announce, and click on the first link If you have any other questions in life such as how to walk or how to boild an egg, dont hesitate to use search engines They are great! On Fri, 25 Mar 2022

Re: quedada debianita en Madrid jueves 3 de octubre

Im too busy this thrusday, but its a shame because there arent that many spanish meetings :( Maybe next! On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 10:37 PM Gunnar Wolf wrote: > Holger Levsen dijo [Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 03:36:44PM +]: > > On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 01:28:59PM +0200, Laura Arjona Reina wrote: > >

Re: viaje a Madrid

Justo vuelvo el domingo, pero no se la hora Avisad de la hora y sitio y si puedo me apunto :) 2016-12-27 17:10 GMT+01:00 Mònica Ramírez Arceda : > Hola a todos, > > El domingo 8 de enero estaré por Madrid y si a alguien le apetece > podríamos quedar ya sea a la hora de comer

Accepted animals 201207131226-2 (source amd64) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2016 20:20:18 +0200 Source: animals Binary: animals Architecture: source amd64 Version: 201207131226-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Alberto Fuentes <paj...@gmail.com> Changed-By: Alberto F

the importance of defaults (was: Debian default desktop environment)

tl;dr go to [0] On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Ghislain Vaillant ghisv...@gmail.com wrote: My vote would be on GNOME 3 classic for now, but XFCE with sensible and visually appealing defaults would do it for me too. You are all facing different experiences with end-users because end-users are

Re: the importance of defaults (was: Debian default desktop environment)

On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: Some numbers with my free interpretation from ubuntu popcon: unity is installed in 605_209 machines, but its used regularly only by 46_210 Thats a very low number by all metrics for a default desktop [0]. People dislike

Bug#737072: ITP: KeySigningPartyTools -- create a better formatted list in PDF format by reading a FOSDEM key list

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Alberto Fuentes paj...@gmail.com * Package name: KeySigningPartyTools Version : n/a Upstream Author : Vadim Trochinsky m...@vadim.ws * URL : https://github.com/vatral/KeySigningPartyTools * License : AGPL v3 Programming

Re: Debian XDG basedir compliance

On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 4:10 AM, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote: To add on to what Lars said, users still often use the same home directory on multiple systems (via NFS, AFS, etc.) and expect, when running the same application on different systems, for programs to find their configuration

Re: Crypto export

On 04/11/2013 08:27 AM, Joerg Jaspert wrote: https://ftp-master.debian.org/crypto-in-main/ Plus one mail for *every* NEW accepted package. Each and every time. Send to them.[1] See the dak git repo for the bxa stuff. [1] Nowadays only stored in a mailbox from us, at request from them,

Re: Time to merge back ubuntu improvements!

wrote: On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 19:18:27 +0100, alberto fuentes wrote: The only ways to prevent this if you are running the more or less up-to-date testing are: * Pin packages with RC bugs on upgrade. This is: - Non trivial: it makes you understand how bad the bug is and know how the pinning

Time to merge back ubuntu improvements!

Ubuntu has done some poor decisions but it has done some other that are okay. We should consider merging some of them back. Im thinking about the 6 months release thing. Without further ado, here's the proposal pre-draft: _Proposal_: Add a new release stage between stable and testing. Called

installation/live-cd

So I was wondering why this has not being done (or at least suggested, i could not find anything in the archive) since ubuntu has been doing it for so long I find the ubuntu live-cd + installation to be very handy and i always carry around an usb stick... I much rather be carrying around a debian

Re: installation/live-cd

wrote: Hi, Le 16/12/2012 11:03, alberto fuentes a écrit : So I was wondering why this has not being done Missed http://www.debian.org/CD/live/#live-install-stable maybe? Regards David

Re: Introducing codesearch.debian.net, a regexp code search engine

2 words: Awe some roughly speaking, how does it work internally? On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Michael Stapelberg stapelb...@debian.org wrote: Hi, I hereby announce a new Debian project: Debian Code Search. Debian Code Search is a search engine for program source code within Debian. It

Re: Introducing codesearch.debian.net, a regexp code search engine

On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Michael Stapelberg stapelb...@debian.org wrote: Hi alberto, alberto fuentes paj...@gmail.com writes: roughly speaking, how does it work internally? It uses a trigram index and the RE2 regular expression engine. My work is based on Russ Cox’s ideas and code

Re: Change default PATH for Jessie / wheezy+1

On 08/09/2012 11:43 PM, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote: As of DebianSqueeze, if you ask for the Desktop task during the installation, that pulls in sudo with a default configuration that automatically grants sudo-ing rights to any member of the sudo group. Depending on what user accounts you

Re: Change default PATH for Jessie / wheezy+1

On 08/08/2012 09:43 AM, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: Experienced users should be able to do this easily. And those who don't knwo what to do with the tools in */sbin/* probably don't want/need them in $PATH. I think the topic in here is good defaults for debian/more common case no if debian/users

Re: Change default PATH for Jessie / wheezy+1

On 08/08/2012 12:14 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 08/08/2012 04:28 PM, Alberto Fuentes wrote: On 08/08/2012 09:43 AM, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: Experienced users should be able to do this easily. And those who don't knwo what to do with the tools in */sbin/* probably don't want/need them in $PATH

Re: Change default PATH for Jessie / wheezy+1

On 08/08/2012 12:59 PM, Gergely Nagy wrote: But, you know what those commands do, and I think we can agree, that most - if not all - of them are quite close to being tools for the admin, even if they don't necessarily require root. A 'regular' user on a multi-user system will not likely need any

Re: Work-needing packages report for Jul 13, 2012

On 07/13/2012 02:25 AM, w...@debian.org wrote: The following packages have been orphaned: ginspector (#681284), orphaned today Installations reported by Popcon: 52 ... For the following packages help is