Re: [Help] Please compile clustalw on architectures ia64, mips, mipsel, s390 and m68k

2006-10-18 Thread Steve McIntyre
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write: Dear all, Clustal W and Clustal X are the most popular software for multiple alignment of biological sequences. Their source package was NMUed during the lesstif transition, but not built on enough architectures, and was therefore removed from testing.

[Help] Please compile clustalw on architectures ia64, mips, mipsel, s390 and m68k

2006-10-17 Thread Charles Plessy
Dear all, Clustal W and Clustal X are the most popular software for multiple alignment of biological sequences. Their source package was NMUed during the lesstif transition, but not built on enough architectures, and was therefore removed from testing.

building non-free packages on debian.org machines? (was: [Help] Please compile clustalw on architectures ia64, mips, mipsel, s390 and m68k)

2006-10-17 Thread Frank Küster
Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [Charles Plessy] Clustal W and Clustal X are the most popular software for multiple alignment of biological sequences. Their source package was NMUed during the lesstif transition, but not built on enough architectures, and was therefore removed

Re: [Help] Please compile clustalw on architectures ia64, mips, mipsel, s390 and m68k

2006-10-17 Thread Frank Küster
Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What about convincing the upstream developers to change the license to one of the free software licenses? It would solve the problem for good. Judging from the mail recorded in its copyright file, this isn't likely to happen. Regards, Frank --

Re: [Help] Please compile clustalw on architectures ia64, mips, mipsel, s390 and m68k

2006-10-17 Thread Frank Küster
Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 02:38:49PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: [...] Just read the mails of these both threads and learn why we have not yet autobuilders for non-free. IMHO the main issue is that nobody really _did_ it. There are two issues at hand

Re: [Help] Please compile clustalw on architectures ia64, mips, mipsel, s390 and m68k

2006-10-17 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Charles Plessy] Clustal W and Clustal X are the most popular software for multiple alignment of biological sequences. Their source package was NMUed during the lesstif transition, but not built on enough architectures, and was therefore removed from testing.

Re: [Help] Please compile clustalw on architectures ia64, mips, mipsel, s390 and m68k

2006-10-17 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: Ah, the pain with no autobuilders for non-free packages. Exactly. You will have to find a developer with access to all of the architectures ia64, mips, mipsel and s390 (m68k is ignored), and get them to build binaries of the package. In

Re: [Help] Please compile clustalw on architectures ia64, mips, mipsel, s390 and m68k

2006-10-17 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006, Andreas Tille wrote: When I maintained this package I tried and I guess my successors tried as well. Another solution was suggested nearly 5 years ago http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2001/11/msg01472.html and if I remember also at other occurences but the search

Re: [Help] Please compile clustalw on architectures ia64, mips, mipsel, s390 and m68k

2006-10-17 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 02:38:49PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: On Tue, 17 Oct 2006, Andreas Tille wrote: When I maintained this package I tried and I guess my successors tried as well. Another solution was suggested nearly 5 years ago

Re: [Help] Please compile clustalw on architectures ia64, mips, mipsel, s390 and m68k

2006-10-17 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 02:30:59PM +0200, Frank Küster a écrit : Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What about convincing the upstream developers to change the license to one of the free software licenses? It would solve the problem for good. Judging from the mail recorded