Hi,
I am still struggling with the setup of a local buildd for testing
purposes. I was able to manually build a package, using the command
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sbuild -d unstable -v hello_2.1.1-4
However, after I put a package into build/REDO:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat build/REDO
acl2_2.9.1-1
Op di, 08-03-2005 te 23:01 +0100, schreef Frank Kster:
Hi,
I am still struggling with the setup of a local buildd for testing
purposes. I was able to manually build a package, using the command
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sbuild -d unstable -v hello_2.1.1-4
However, after I put a package into
* Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050305 20:00]:
While I only read it back then, I wanted to actually do the stuff
described in the cheat sheet. However, it mentions the command
debootstrap-farm. I can't find anything about it. What is changed in
this command, compared to standard
Hi,
a while ago I wrote:
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
in order to test whether packages that build-depend on tetex can still
be built with the upcoming version 3.0, I would like to automatically
build as many of these packages. I know where I can read about setting
up a
Hi,
At Sat, 05 Mar 2005 19:59:27 +0100,
Frank Küster wrote:
Is this documented in the sbuild package, or somewhere else? For a
starter, I looked at Andreas Barth's cheat sheet, but there he only
mentions manual building of packages, no local queue.
While I only read it back then, I
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 10:00:32PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Its buildd specific. If its queue is empty it contacts wanna-build and
puts the new packages into the queue. I can't remeber the filename but
that should be easy to see from the source.
~buildd/build/REDO
Format:
source
David Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Friday 25 February 2005 18:43, Frank Küster wrote:
in order to test whether packages that build-depend on tetex can still
be built with the upcoming version 3.0, I would like to automatically
build as many of these packages.
Take a look at
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
in order to test whether packages that build-depend on tetex can still
be built with the upcoming version 3.0, I would like to automatically
build as many of these packages. I know where I can read
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 06:43:41PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Hi,
in order to test whether packages that build-depend on tetex can still
be built with the upcoming version 3.0, I would like to automatically
build as many of these packages. I know where I can read about setting
up a buildd,
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
in order to test whether packages that build-depend on tetex can still
be built with the upcoming version 3.0, I would like to automatically
build as many of
Hi,
in order to test whether packages that build-depend on tetex can still
be built with the upcoming version 3.0, I would like to automatically
build as many of these packages. I know where I can read about setting
up a buildd, but two questions remain:
- are there any scripts that hand over
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
in order to test whether packages that build-depend on tetex can still
be built with the upcoming version 3.0, I would like to automatically
build as many of these packages. I know where I can read about setting
up a buildd, but two questions
On Friday 25 February 2005 18:43, Frank Küster wrote:
in order to test whether packages that build-depend on tetex can still
be built with the upcoming version 3.0, I would like to automatically
build as many of these packages.
Take a look at pbuilder. There are people recompiling the whole of
13 matches
Mail list logo
