On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 06:19, Graham Wilson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 01:05:44AM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
I recently adopted autotrace, and had a package with an updated
control file uploaded; it has now been in the archive for several
days.
I am in the same situation with
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 01:05:44AM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
How quickly is a change of maintainer supposed to propagate to the BTS?
I recently adopted autotrace, and had a package with an updated
control file uploaded; it has now been in the archive for several
days. I have checked that
* Isaac Clerencia ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [031216 11:25]:
On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 06:19, Graham Wilson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 01:05:44AM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
I recently adopted autotrace, and had a package with an updated
control file uploaded; it has now been in the archive
How quickly is a change of maintainer supposed to propagate to the BTS?
I recently adopted autotrace, and had a package with an updated
control file uploaded; it has now been in the archive for several
days. I have checked that I am correctly listed as maintainer in
the unstable Sources file and
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 01:05:44AM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
I recently adopted autotrace, and had a package with an updated
control file uploaded; it has now been in the archive for several
days.
I am in the same situation with hostname.
Nevertheless, the BTS persists in giving the QA
5 matches
Mail list logo