Re: BTS and maintainer changes (and PTS)

2003-12-16 Thread Isaac Clerencia
On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 06:19, Graham Wilson wrote: On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 01:05:44AM +, Henning Makholm wrote: I recently adopted autotrace, and had a package with an updated control file uploaded; it has now been in the archive for several days. I am in the same situation with

Re: BTS and maintainer changes

2003-12-16 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 01:05:44AM +, Henning Makholm wrote: How quickly is a change of maintainer supposed to propagate to the BTS? I recently adopted autotrace, and had a package with an updated control file uploaded; it has now been in the archive for several days. I have checked that

Re: BTS and maintainer changes (and PTS)

2003-12-16 Thread Andreas Barth
* Isaac Clerencia ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [031216 11:25]: On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 06:19, Graham Wilson wrote: On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 01:05:44AM +, Henning Makholm wrote: I recently adopted autotrace, and had a package with an updated control file uploaded; it has now been in the archive

BTS and maintainer changes

2003-12-15 Thread Henning Makholm
How quickly is a change of maintainer supposed to propagate to the BTS? I recently adopted autotrace, and had a package with an updated control file uploaded; it has now been in the archive for several days. I have checked that I am correctly listed as maintainer in the unstable Sources file and

Re: BTS and maintainer changes

2003-12-15 Thread Graham Wilson
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 01:05:44AM +, Henning Makholm wrote: I recently adopted autotrace, and had a package with an updated control file uploaded; it has now been in the archive for several days. I am in the same situation with hostname. Nevertheless, the BTS persists in giving the QA