On Tue, March 15, 2005 22:50, Stephen Frost said:
I'm not sure that we've entirely missed the point as much as we like to
think there's a better solution than dropping all but 4 archs.
Here's where things go wrong in this discussion. I think the original
proposal was (in retrospect) worded too
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 11:28:29PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Tue, March 15, 2005 22:50, Stephen Frost said:
I'm not sure that we've entirely missed the point as much as we like to
think there's a better solution than dropping all but 4 archs.
Here's where things go wrong in this
* Thijs Kinkhorst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Example minimal quality standards:
- it should have a large part of the packages built
- there should be enough buildds to keep up with security and new uploads
within reasonable time.
- there should be some minimal team to support this
3 matches
Mail list logo
