On Sun, 20 Apr 2003, Brian May wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 08:51:51PM -0400, David B Harris wrote:
Share an initscript between them, if that's possible?
No, that would cause more problems trying to rename
the existing amavisd-new conffile.
Agreed. This is not something we should be
On Sat, 19 Apr 2003, Ernst Kloppenburg wrote:
yes. So maybe one of the packages should have its amavisd renamed.
I have no problem with that (heck, it is a daemon). But this does not
solve the entire Debian-wide problem that the amavis-* packages hit.
--
One disk to rule them all, One disk
On Sun, 20 Apr 2003 01:13:50 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is also a damn hole in Debian policy. That one I will propose a fix
to: scripts that are conffiles MUST test if the package is in the installed
state, and that test MUST either be done by checking for the
On Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 09:00:51AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
In the last case, there should be a way to do this _easily_. Currently
the only way to do this is parsing dpkg --list output, which is mucho
ugly.
I'd actually prefer the file check, and not involve the packaging system
in the
On Sun, 20 Apr 2003 15:54:23 +0300, Richard Braakman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 09:00:51AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
In the last case, there should be a way to do this _easily_. Currently
the only way to do this is parsing dpkg --list output, which is mucho
ugly.
I'd
On Sat, Apr 19, 2003 at 10:22:45 +1000, Brian May wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 09:33:01PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: amavisd-new
Version: 20021227p2-5
Severity: grave
Grave would seem to be a bit of an overkill? amavisd-new still works OK
for the majority of users...
On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 08:51:51PM -0400, David B Harris wrote:
Share an initscript between them, if that's possible?
No, that would cause more problems trying to rename
the existing amavisd-new conffile.
On Sat, Apr 19, 2003 at 09:06:58AM +0200, Ernst Kloppenburg wrote:
yes. So maybe one of
On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 09:33:01PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: amavisd-new
Version: 20021227p2-5
Severity: grave
Grave would seem to be a bit of an overkill? amavisd-new still works OK
for the majority of users...
when
- amavis-ng is installed (I used version 0.1.6.2-1),
On Sat Apr 19, 10:22am +1000, Brian May wrote:
Any ideas?
Share an initscript between them, if that's possible?
pgp2vmAEIdmO0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
9 matches
Mail list logo
