On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 13:49:44 +1100, Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The advantage of using glastree over pdumpfs is that it is
implemented in Perl rather than Ruby (this is in fact the reason
that I encountered it in the first place).
How is that an advantage of use?
Well,
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 01:24:32AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 13:49:44 +1100, Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The advantage of using glastree over pdumpfs is that it is
implemented in Perl rather than Ruby (this is in fact the reason
that I encountered it
* Henning Makholm
| Scripsit Charles Fry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| Is there any benefit to using glastree over dirvish or pdumpfs?
|
| The advantage of using glastree over pdumpfs is that it is implemented
| in Perl rather than Ruby (this is in fact the reason that I encountered
| it in the
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 03:27:26PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
There were quite many backup programs without the admin::backup tag.
Now admin::backup counts 61 packages: good!
If someone wants to take care of keeping the admin::backup tag up to
date, please send me a note.
hdup?
--
On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 10:48:45AM +0100, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
If someone wants to take care of keeping the admin::backup tag up to
date, please send me a note.
hdup?
It was already tagged, it seems. However, its only tag is admin::backup
at the moment.
If you want to improve
On Thu, 02 Dec 2004, Charles Fry wrote:
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 05:59:09PM -0500, Charles Fry wrote:
In what ways is this package different to, say, dirvish, which I use
in a manner which is, AFAICS, identical to the way this package
operates?
glastree provides a subset of
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 09:31:32AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 03:04:15PM -0500, Charles Fry wrote:
The poor man's daily snapshot, glastree builds live backup trees, with
branches for each day. Users directly browse the past to recover older
documents or retrieve
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 01:49:44PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
The advantage of using glastree over pdumpfs is that it is implemented
in Perl rather than Ruby (this is in fact the reason that I encountered
it in the first place).
How is that an advantage of use?
One may want to use tools
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 03:04:15PM -0500, Charles Fry wrote:
utility effects a constant, sliding window. Similar to pdumpfs; inspired
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 09:31:32AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
In what ways is this package different to, say, dirvish, which I use in a
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004
Well, if one had a small system and desired not to install ruby, it
would still be possible to obtain pdumpfs' functionality. Of course
that could be called an installation issue rather than a usability
issue.
3314kB, including pdumpfs itself. I'll donate a 32MB USB key to store it
In what ways is this package different to, say, dirvish, which I use
in a manner which is, AFAICS, identical to the way this package
operates?
Or storebackup?
(Actually, storebackup's one-line description doesn't really hint at
this functionality. But I'm using it to create daily
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 15:00:22 +1100, Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
3314kB, including pdumpfs itself. I'll donate a 32MB USB key to store it
all on for anyone that is *truly* that starved of space.
Low-Memory systems are unlikely to have USB.
Greetings
Marc
--
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 07:02:38PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 15:00:22 +1100, Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
3314kB, including pdumpfs itself. I'll donate a 32MB USB key to store it
all on for anyone that is *truly* that starved of space.
Low-Memory systems are
Matthew Palmer wrote:
The advantage of using glastree over pdumpfs is that it is implemented
in Perl rather than Ruby (this is in fact the reason that I encountered
it in the first place).
How is that an advantage of use?
We're talking about free software. Modifying it to fit your needs is a
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 07:17:45PM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
Matthew Palmer wrote:
The advantage of using glastree over pdumpfs is that it is implemented
in Perl rather than Ruby (this is in fact the reason that I encountered
it in the first place).
How is that an advantage of
Matthew Palmer wrote:
Sounds like you need to expand your repertoire a bit.
Possibly so, but unfortunately my time is a finite. There are far too
many languages (even in debian main) for me to learn them all.
Can you imagine a world in which your argument was taken at face value?
There would
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: glastree
Version : 1.03
Upstream Author : Jeremy Wohl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://igmus.org/code/
* License : public domain
Description : builds live backup trees, with branches for each day
The poor
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 03:04:15PM -0500, Charles Fry wrote:
The poor man's daily snapshot, glastree builds live backup trees, with
branches for each day. Users directly browse the past to recover older
documents or retrieve lost files. Hard links serve to compress out
unchanged files, while
In what ways is this package different to, say, dirvish, which I use
in a manner which is, AFAICS, identical to the way this package
operates?
glastree provides a subset of the functionality of dirvish. It is
actually most closely related pdumpfs. Like pdumpfs, glastree works
locally and not
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 05:59:09PM -0500, Charles Fry wrote:
In what ways is this package different to, say, dirvish, which I use
in a manner which is, AFAICS, identical to the way this package
operates?
glastree provides a subset of the functionality of dirvish. It is
actually most
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 05:59:09PM -0500, Charles Fry wrote:
In what ways is this package different to, say, dirvish, which I use
in a manner which is, AFAICS, identical to the way this package
operates?
glastree provides a subset of the functionality of dirvish. It is
actually
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 07:58:17PM -0500, Charles Fry wrote:
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 05:59:09PM -0500, Charles Fry wrote:
In what ways is this package different to, say, dirvish, which I use
in a manner which is, AFAICS, identical to the way this package
operates?
glastree
Scripsit Charles Fry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there any benefit to using glastree over dirvish or pdumpfs?
The advantage of using glastree over pdumpfs is that it is implemented
in Perl rather than Ruby (this is in fact the reason that I encountered
it in the first place).
How would this be
Is there any benefit to using glastree over dirvish or pdumpfs?
The advantage of using glastree over pdumpfs is that it is implemented
in Perl rather than Ruby (this is in fact the reason that I encountered
it in the first place).
How is that an advantage of use?
Well, if one had
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 10:30:05PM -0500, Charles Fry wrote:
Is there any benefit to using glastree over dirvish or pdumpfs?
The advantage of using glastree over pdumpfs is that it is implemented
in Perl rather than Ruby (this is in fact the reason that I encountered
it in the
Scripsit Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Meanwhile, what's
the total installed space for glastree if you're not a Perl lover?
Perl-base is 'Proirity: required' and 'Essential: yes'. It doesn't
even have to be depended on.
--
Henning Makholm It will be useful
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 04:10:01AM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
Scripsit Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Meanwhile, what's
the total installed space for glastree if you're not a Perl lover?
Perl-base is 'Proirity: required' and 'Essential: yes'. It doesn't
even have to be depended on.
27 matches
Mail list logo
