Re: Bug#302138: incorrect Description line wrapping with bullet lists

2005-04-20 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 09:56 am, Daniel Burrows wrote:   We can also extend the description format in backwards-compatible ways.  So, while a proper markup language would be nice, that doesn't preclude fixing the bullet problem, albeit in a slightly hacky way, NOW.  What about this:

Re: Bug#302138: incorrect Description line wrapping with bullet lists

2005-04-07 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Branden Robinson] Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: twofish Go ahead and file a bug for this one, please Sorry, no can do - twofish isn't actually uncontroversially buggy. It handles bullet lists in the de facto standard way, which I didn't like, but I have since been persuaded that

Re: Bug#302138: incorrect Description line wrapping with bullet lists

2005-04-06 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 03:54:36AM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote: [Peter Samuelson] I'd like to file a mass bug for these, but it's on the order of 583 binary packages in 430 source packages, so I obviously want to get some feedback first. Jeroen van Wolffelaar pointed out to me that 430

Bug#302138: incorrect Description line wrapping with bullet lists

2005-03-30 Thread Peter Samuelson
Package: linda Version: 0.3.10 Severity: wishlist ObListCC: search for 'mass bug' below. Lots of packages have a Description field that includes a bullet list. There is no good way to do these, unfortunately, but lots of wrong ways. In particular, you'll cause incorrect line wrapping in dselect

Re: Bug#302138: incorrect Description line wrapping with bullet lists

2005-03-30 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Peter Samuelson] I'd like to file a mass bug for these, but it's on the order of 583 binary packages in 430 source packages, so I obviously want to get some feedback first. Jeroen van Wolffelaar pointed out to me that 430 source packages is a bit much for a mass bug, especially if

Re: Bug#302138: incorrect Description line wrapping with bullet lists

2005-03-30 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 03:54:36AM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote: [Peter Samuelson] I'd like to file a mass bug for these, but it's on the order of 583 binary packages in 430 source packages, so I obviously want to get some feedback first. Jeroen van Wolffelaar pointed out to me that

Re: Bug#302138: incorrect Description line wrapping with bullet lists

2005-03-30 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Jeroen van Wolffelaar] It seems like this list has a lot of false positives, take for example php-mail-mime: | Description: PHP PEAR module for creating and decoding MIME messages | Provides classes to deal with creation and manipulation of mime messages: | . | * mime.php: Create

Re: Bug#302138: incorrect Description line wrapping with bullet lists

2005-03-30 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 04:42:24AM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote: Omitting the check for forced word-wrapping in bullets cuts down the list of offenders drastically. The following are source packages that actually display _incorrectly_ in dselect / aptitude because bullet points incorrectly

Re: Bug#302138: incorrect Description line wrapping with bullet lists

2005-03-30 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 05:19 am, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: Ideally, all packaging tools would support some kind of very simple markup language to support enumerations in a sane way, but that's a long-term project. There's room in the description standard for future extensions: quoting

Re: Bug#302138: incorrect Description line wrapping with bullet lists

2005-03-30 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 09:56 am, Daniel Burrows wrote:   A line beginning with two or more spaces, followed by a bullet character and a space, is considered to be an element of a bulleted list.  Every succeeding line that begins with N+1 or more spaces, where N is the number of spaces

Re: Bug#302138: incorrect Description line wrapping with bullet lists

2005-03-30 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 09:56:36AM -0500, Daniel Burrows wrote: Bullet characters are (maybe) -, +, *, and o; the frontend may render them literally or modify their appearence as it deems appropriate. NOTE: it might be a good idea to exclude o; I doubt many packages use o as a word by

Re: Bug#302138: incorrect Description line wrapping with bullet lists

2005-03-30 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 11:44 am, Andrew Suffield wrote: I know of at least two such languages. Don't include 'o'. Ok, will do. Or, um, not do. Daniel -- /--- Daniel Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED] --\ |Human beings were created by water to transport