Re: Bug#453680: ITP: djbdns -- Replacement for BIND, written by Dan Bernstein

2007-11-30 Thread Russ Allbery
Robert Edmonds [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Package: wnpp Owner: Robert S. Edmonds [EMAIL PROTECTED] Severity: wishlist * Package name: djbdns Version : 1.05 Upstream Author : Daniel J. Bernstein * URL : http://cr.yp.to/djbdns.html * License : public

Re: Bug#453680: ITP: djbdns -- Replacement for BIND, written by Dan Bernstein

2007-11-30 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
Milan P. Stanic wrote: On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 10:24:48AM -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote: Supposedly DJB has released all of his code into the public domain. If this is really the case and passes DFSG, I plan to package djbdns assuming Adam McKenna (maintainer of djbdns-installer) doesn't want

Re: Bug#453680: ITP: djbdns -- Replacement for BIND, written by Dan Bernstein

2007-11-30 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
Kevin B. McCarty wrote: Assuming that qmail-1.03.tar.gz contains all the code written by DJB that's needed to build qmail, that seems pretty explicit. My apologies, I briefly confused qmail and djbdns. Good news for the qmail maintainers, at any rate. I have not yet found an explicit

Re: Bug#453680: ITP: djbdns -- Replacement for BIND, written by Dan Bernstein

2007-11-30 Thread Milan P. Stanic
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 10:24:48AM -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote: Package: wnpp Owner: Robert S. Edmonds [EMAIL PROTECTED] Severity: wishlist * Package name: djbdns Version : 1.05 Upstream Author : Daniel J. Bernstein * URL : http://cr.yp.to/djbdns.html *

Bug#453680: ITP: djbdns -- Replacement for BIND, written by Dan Bernstein

2007-11-30 Thread Robert Edmonds
Package: wnpp Owner: Robert S. Edmonds [EMAIL PROTECTED] Severity: wishlist * Package name: djbdns Version : 1.05 Upstream Author : Daniel J. Bernstein * URL : http://cr.yp.to/djbdns.html * License : public domain Programming Lang: C Description :

Re: Bug#453680: ITP: djbdns -- Replacement for BIND, written by Dan Bernstein

2007-11-30 Thread Michael Shuler
On 11/30/2007 11:51 AM, Milan P. Stanic wrote: Are you sure that the complete package is in the public domain? Some files are, but not all of them, AFAIK. There has been some additional discussion on this topic in BTS, as well as some other places. http://bugs.debian.org/453680