On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 01:54:36PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 02:45:20PM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
I use the attached bootstrap script to build the autotools scripts. the
version of autotools are hardcoded in it, which is a Bad Thing (TM). Feel
free to steal
On Sat, 2003-09-27 at 11:23, Richard Atterer wrote:
I've fixed a critical bug in w3c-libwww and now want to regenerate all the
libtool/autoconf/automake files. Not trivial!
With the same libtoolize/aclocal-1.4/autoheader2.13 under unstable, the
latter gives FATAL ERROR: Autoconf version
Hi,
I've fixed a critical bug in w3c-libwww and now want to regenerate all the
libtool/autoconf/automake files. Not trivial!
The usual libtoolize/aclocal-1.4/autoheader2.13 etc works under testing,
but I get build errors there, so I suspect I should try the latest versions
in unstable. (The
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 12:23:54PM +0200, Richard Atterer wrote:
Hi,
I've fixed a critical bug in w3c-libwww and now want to regenerate all the
libtool/autoconf/automake files. Not trivial!
[...]
I've uploaded the file to http://atterer.net/debian/configure.in - could
some
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 02:45:20PM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
I use the attached bootstrap script to build the autotools scripts. the
version of autotools are hardcoded in it, which is a Bad Thing (TM). Feel
free to steal anyway ;)
As far as I could tell, this message had no attachment
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 02:45:20PM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
[lots of useful stuff]
Many thanks indeed - that resolved all the problems! (But it took me a
while to track down the additional old-style AC_DEFINEs in acinclude.m4,
they also caused problems.)
Unfortunately it turns out that the
6 matches
Mail list logo
