On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Jonathan Carter (highvoltage)
jonat...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Now... I am surprised this is seen so harshly. This is not the first
site I see that syndicates Planet Debian. What I can understand is
There's a big difference between aggregating
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Jonathan Yu jonathan.i...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Jonathan Carter (highvoltage)
jonat...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Now... I am surprised this is seen so harshly. This is not the first
site I see that syndicates Planet
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 07:34 -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Ben Hutchings dijo [Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 04:14:45AM -0700]:
The blog at http://www.rossbeazley.co.uk, which is hosted in your IP
space, is a copy of Planet Debian http://planet.debian.org, apparently
intended to gain keyword advertising
]] Obey Arthur Liu
| And how is planet debian licensed anyway ?
How is that relevant? Assuming you did put your own blog there (or
asked it to be put there), you're ok with Planet Debian redistributing
your content.
| There is an implicit licensing of the blog authors to the planet since
|
Obey Arthur Liu art...@milliways.fr writes:
And how is planet debian licensed anyway ? There is an implicit
licensing of the blog authors to the planet since aggregation is
voluntary but what about redistribution ? :D
Personally, my journal posts are intentionally not released under any
5 matches
Mail list logo
