Re: First spam

2004-10-10 Thread Steve Greenland
On 09-Oct-04, 20:06 (CDT), Clemens Schwaighofer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/10/2004 07:38 AM, paddy wrote: I'm actually surprised it takes them that long. debian-devel must be way down the target list. probably geeks don't buy viagra, home loans, online medicine, etc :) People (aka

Re: First spam

2004-10-10 Thread paddy
On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 11:32:06AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote: On 09-Oct-04, 20:06 (CDT), Clemens Schwaighofer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/10/2004 07:38 AM, paddy wrote: I'm actually surprised it takes them that long. debian-devel must be way down the target list. probably

Re: First spam

2004-10-10 Thread Clemens Schwaighofer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/11/2004 07:29 AM, paddy wrote: On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 11:32:06AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote: On 09-Oct-04, 20:06 (CDT), Clemens Schwaighofer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/10/2004 07:38 AM, paddy wrote: I'm actually surprised it takes

First spam

2004-10-09 Thread Andre Majorel
First use of email address: 2004-10-06 18:56 (UTC) First spam received at email address: 2004-10-09 17:12 (UTC) If you've been wondering how long it takes for an email address to propagate from the Debian list archives to spammers, here's one data point: less than 71 hours. -- André

Re: First spam

2004-10-09 Thread Santiago Vila
On Sat, 9 Oct 2004, Andre Majorel wrote: First use of email address: 2004-10-06 18:56 (UTC) First spam received at email address: 2004-10-09 17:12 (UTC) If you've been wondering how long it takes for an email address to propagate from the Debian list archives to spammers, here's

Re: First spam

2004-10-09 Thread Jesus Climent
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 11:25:11PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: First use of email address: 2004-10-06 18:56 (UTC) First spam received at email address: 2004-10-09 17:12 (UTC) If you've been wondering how long it takes for an email address to propagate from the Debian list

Re: First spam

2004-10-09 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sat, 09 Oct 2004, Jesus Climent wrote: Santiago has a bit of rationale... Some obfuscation in the list archives might Won't work. Spammer-database-feeders nowadays either subscribe to the mailinglists (not common), or get the data for a pletora of spyware in Winblows computers (really,

Re: First spam

2004-10-09 Thread paddy
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 07:11:02PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: On Sat, 09 Oct 2004, Jesus Climent wrote: Santiago has a bit of rationale... Some obfuscation in the list archives might Won't work. Spammer-database-feeders nowadays either subscribe to the mailinglists (not

Re: First spam

2004-10-09 Thread Clemens Schwaighofer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/10/2004 07:38 AM, paddy wrote: I'm actually surprised it takes them that long. debian-devel must be way down the target list. probably geeks don't buy viagra, home loans, online medicine, etc :) lg, clemens -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-