On 09-Oct-04, 20:06 (CDT), Clemens Schwaighofer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/10/2004 07:38 AM, paddy wrote:
I'm actually surprised it takes them that long.
debian-devel must be way down the target list.
probably geeks don't buy viagra, home loans, online medicine, etc :)
People (aka
On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 11:32:06AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
On 09-Oct-04, 20:06 (CDT), Clemens Schwaighofer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/10/2004 07:38 AM, paddy wrote:
I'm actually surprised it takes them that long.
debian-devel must be way down the target list.
probably
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/11/2004 07:29 AM, paddy wrote:
On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 11:32:06AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
On 09-Oct-04, 20:06 (CDT), Clemens Schwaighofer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/10/2004 07:38 AM, paddy wrote:
I'm actually surprised it takes
First use of email address: 2004-10-06 18:56 (UTC)
First spam received at email address: 2004-10-09 17:12 (UTC)
If you've been wondering how long it takes for an email address to
propagate from the Debian list archives to spammers, here's one
data point: less than 71 hours.
--
André
On Sat, 9 Oct 2004, Andre Majorel wrote:
First use of email address: 2004-10-06 18:56 (UTC)
First spam received at email address: 2004-10-09 17:12 (UTC)
If you've been wondering how long it takes for an email address to
propagate from the Debian list archives to spammers, here's
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 11:25:11PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
First use of email address: 2004-10-06 18:56 (UTC)
First spam received at email address: 2004-10-09 17:12 (UTC)
If you've been wondering how long it takes for an email address to
propagate from the Debian list
On Sat, 09 Oct 2004, Jesus Climent wrote:
Santiago has a bit of rationale... Some obfuscation in the list archives might
Won't work. Spammer-database-feeders nowadays either subscribe to the
mailinglists (not common), or get the data for a pletora of spyware in
Winblows computers (really,
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 07:11:02PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Sat, 09 Oct 2004, Jesus Climent wrote:
Santiago has a bit of rationale... Some obfuscation in the list archives
might
Won't work. Spammer-database-feeders nowadays either subscribe to the
mailinglists (not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/10/2004 07:38 AM, paddy wrote:
I'm actually surprised it takes them that long.
debian-devel must be way down the target list.
probably geeks don't buy viagra, home loans, online medicine, etc :)
lg, clemens
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
9 matches
Mail list logo