Re: Getting the buildds to notice new architectures in a package

Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 09:56:22AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> Two things: >> >> - control files are part of the source. w-b would have to download and >> unpack every source package to get that file. > > Exactly. > >> - control files can be

Re: Getting the buildds to notice new architectures in a package

On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 09:56:22AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Two things: > > - control files are part of the source. w-b would have to download and > unpack every source package to get that file. Exactly. > - control files can be auto generated during build (e.g. glibc) and > might no

Re: Getting the buildds to notice new architectures in a package

Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 05:53:25AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> The buildd package could just be a central hub where two or three >> knowlegable people sift through the bug reports and then distribute it >> to the affected/responsible person.

Re: Getting the buildds to notice new architectures in a package

Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 02:40:28PM -0400, Joe Smith wrote: >> "Wouter Verhelst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >> >There is no such general solution. See >> > >> >> That says: >>

Re: Getting the buildds to notice new architectures in a package

On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 02:40:28PM -0400, Joe Smith wrote: > "Wouter Verhelst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > >There is no such general solution. See > > > > That says: > >However, wanna-build does not look at the control f

Re: Getting the buildds to notice new architectures in a package

"Wouter Verhelst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 10:55:32PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote: Where should I ask for help? Neither buildd.debian.org nor www.debian.org/devel/buildd, mention where the buildd admins can be reached; and lists.debia

Re: Getting the buildds to notice new architectures in a package

On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 05:53:25AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > The buildd package could just be a central hub where two or three > knowlegable people sift through the bug reports and then distribute it > to the affected/responsible person. Who would you suggest would do that? I know it's

Re: Getting the buildds to notice new architectures in a package

Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 06:31:56PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote: >> Also, I would propose that a list, [EMAIL PROTECTED], or even better, a >> pseudo-package, buildd, be created for such issues. buildd would >> complement ftp.debian.org as a central pla

Re: Getting the buildds to notice new architectures in a package

On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 06:31:56PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote: > Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 10:55:32PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote: > >> Where should I ask for help? Neither buildd.debian.org nor > >> www.debian.org/devel/buildd, mention where the buil

Re: Getting the buildds to notice new architectures in a package

Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 10:55:32PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote: >> Where should I ask for help? Neither buildd.debian.org nor >> www.debian.org/devel/buildd, mention where the buildd admins can be >> reached; and lists.debian.org does not have a "build

Re: Getting the buildds to notice new architectures in a package

On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 10:55:32PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote: > Where should I ask for help? Neither buildd.debian.org nor > www.debian.org/devel/buildd, mention where the buildd admins can be > reached; and lists.debian.org does not have a "buildd@" list. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. I just committed

Re: Getting the buildds to notice new architectures in a package

On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 10:55:32PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote: > I will upload ~20 source packages in the next few weeks, adding > support for more architectures to each package. So I'm really looking > for a general solution and not one that only applies to asis. Why aren't those packages arch:

Re: Getting the buildds to notice new architectures in a package

Ludovic Brenta wrote: > Hello, Hi Ludovic > Package asis (=3.15p-10) supports i386, kfreebsd-i386, sparc, and > powerpc. > > I uploaded the next version (=2005-3) a couple of days ago. It adds > support for more architectures, namely: amd63, hppa, and ia64. You should contact the buildd mainta

Getting the buildds to notice new architectures in a package

Hello, Package asis (=3.15p-10) supports i386, kfreebsd-i386, sparc, and powerpc. I uploaded the next version (=2005-3) a couple of days ago. It adds support for more architectures, namely: amd63, hppa, and ia64. I notice that the buildds have successfully built the powerpc and sparc packages,