Re: IMPORTANT: your message to html-tidy

2003-09-23 Thread Cameron Patrick
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 05:09:30PM -0500, david nicol wrote: | Shamless plug: sign up for totally spam-free forwarding address | at http://pay2send.com Ewww! *recoils in disgust* You don't pay to send, we make others pay to send to you. - if this system become widespread, then you surely

Re: IMPORTANT: your message to html-tidy

2003-09-22 Thread david nicol
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 04:02, Craig Sanders wrote: sorry, a system that only works sometimes (or even most of the time) is a broken system. i prefer to know that my system's behaviour will be consistent and correct. Shamless plug: sign up for totally spam-free forwarding address at

Re: IMPORTANT: your message to html-tidy

2003-09-22 Thread Graham Wilson
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 05:09:30PM -0500, david nicol wrote: On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 04:02, Craig Sanders wrote: sorry, a system that only works sometimes (or even most of the time) is a broken system. i prefer to know that my system's behaviour will be consistent and correct.

Re: IMPORTANT: your message to html-tidy

2003-09-09 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 11:07:39AM +1000, Craig Sanders ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 11:09:57PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 15:40:15 +1000 Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 06:04:39AM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote: I'm

RE: IMPORTANT: your message to html-tidy

2003-09-09 Thread Julian Mehnle
Karsten M. Self kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote: [Using DNS RBLs to block spam is bad.] As many people have noted, for pretty much _any_ given IP, your odds are good that most of the mail received from it is spam. It doesn't do much for the legit mail that comes through. Given that we now _do_

Re: IMPORTANT: your message to html-tidy

2003-09-09 Thread Steve Lamb
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 07:49:36 +0100 It's the same sort of thinking that's causing no end of trouble for people trying to communicate with AOL users: http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=96264 http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/03/04/13/2215207.shtml?tid=120 I've got

Re: IMPORTANT: your message to html-tidy

2003-09-09 Thread Steve Lamb
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 12:50:51 +0200 Julian Mehnle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, you can't make such a general statement that using content-based filters is better than using DNS RBLs. It wholly depends on the listing policy of the RBL, and in most cases, content-based filters will be the far

Re: IMPORTANT: your message to html-tidy

2003-09-08 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 04:26:57PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote: On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 06:40:46PM -0400, W3C List Manager wrote: This is a response to a message apparently sent from your address to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Subject: Re: Thank you! From:debian-devel@lists.debian.org

Re: IMPORTANT: your message to html-tidy

2003-09-08 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 01:57:54PM +1000, Matthew Palmer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 04:26:57PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote: On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 06:40:46PM -0400, W3C List Manager wrote: This is a response to a message apparently sent from your address to [EMAIL

Re: IMPORTANT: your message to html-tidy

2003-09-08 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 06:04:39AM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote: on Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 01:57:54PM +1000, Matthew Palmer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: [W3C's autoresponder] This one's a bit different. It's only asking for permission to archive posts to the list - I guess W3C's just trying,

Re: IMPORTANT: your message to html-tidy

2003-09-08 Thread Steve Lamb
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 15:40:15 +1000 Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 06:04:39AM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote: I'm coming to the view that we're approaching the era where all mail is going to have to be subject to filtering, at the MTA level. Depends on how

Re: IMPORTANT: your message to html-tidy

2003-09-08 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 03:40:15PM +1000, Matthew Palmer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 06:04:39AM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote: on Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 01:57:54PM +1000, Matthew Palmer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: [W3C's autoresponder] This one's a bit different.

Re: IMPORTANT: your message to html-tidy

2003-09-08 Thread Craig Sanders
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 11:09:57PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 15:40:15 +1000 Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 06:04:39AM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote: I'm coming to the view that we're approaching the era where all mail is going to have to

IMPORTANT: your message to html-tidy

2003-09-06 Thread W3C List Manager
This is a response to a message apparently sent from your address to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Subject: Re: Thank you! From:debian-devel@lists.debian.org Date:Sat, 6 Sep 2003 18:40:45 --0400 Your message has NOT been distributed to the list; before we distribute it, we need your

Re: IMPORTANT: your message to html-tidy

2003-09-06 Thread Joshua Kwan
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 06:40:46PM -0400, W3C List Manager wrote: This is a response to a message apparently sent from your address to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Subject: Re: Thank you! From:debian-devel@lists.debian.org Date:Sat, 6 Sep 2003 18:40:45 --0400 Your message has