Re: ITP: rootkit - a Ro0Tk1t 4 Deb1an boxxxen

2002-04-03 Thread Richard Braakman
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 03:39:56AM +0200, Simon Richter wrote: jU5T d0 apt-get install rootkit, 4n5W3r d4 q35t10nz h4V3 fUn!!! ^^^ You misspelled phUn. When will people learn to check their descriptions for spelling? Arrgh.

Re: ITP: rootkit - a Ro0Tk1t 4 Deb1an boxxxen

2002-04-02 Thread Sebastian Rittau
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 08:56:10PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: Marco d'Itri wrote: But rootkits are only likely to be useful if you already know what they are or have specialised requirements. Ah, but useful to whom? It is clearly in the best interest of some of our users for a rootkit to be

Re: ITP: rootkit - a Ro0Tk1t 4 Deb1an boxxxen

2002-04-02 Thread Bryan Andersen
Marco d'Itri wrote: On Apr 01, Simon Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Priority: optional It should have Priority: extra. Yes, but what I want to know is it available on all architectures? -- | Bryan Andersen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.nerdvest.com | | Buzzwords are like

Re: ITP: rootkit - a Ro0Tk1t 4 Deb1an boxxxen

2002-04-01 Thread Joey Hess
Marco d'Itri wrote: But rootkits are only likely to be useful if you already know what they are or have specialised requirements. Ah, but useful to whom? It is clearly in the best interest of some of our users for a rootkit to be installed by default. Debian will gain more users by doing so.

Re: ITP: rootkit - a Ro0Tk1t 4 Deb1an boxxxen

2002-04-01 Thread Erich Schubert
I felt oblieged to announce this package on slashdot ;) http://slashdot.org/developers/02/04/01/162223.shtml?tid=90 We got quite some positive feedback ;) It's about time. As usual, Debian shows the great leadership that we have all come to expect from the project. The addition of a r00tk1t is