Re: Licenses for DebConf6 [was: Re: DebConf6: Call For Papers]

2005-11-13 Thread David Nusinow
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 12:28:07AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 10:01:48 +0100 Andreas Schuldei wrote: Fine Print Publication Rights Debconf requires non-exclusive publication rights to papers, presentations, and any additional handouts or audio/visual materials

Re: Licenses for DebConf6 [was: Re: DebConf6: Call For Papers]

2005-11-12 Thread Andreas Schuldei
sorry for replying to this only today. i had been busy preparing for a talk i was giving yesterday at a conf. * Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-11-10 01:08:49]: given your knowledge level of how debconf intents to handle things and the way you escalate this issue gives me the idea

Re: Licenses for DebConf6 [was: Re: DebConf6: Call For Papers]

2005-11-09 Thread Francesco Poli
[replying to a message that was directed to debian-devel only, but readding debian-legal in Cc:] On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:38:07 +0100 Andreas Schuldei wrote: * Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-11-08 00:28:07]: The authors have the freedom to pick a DFSG-free license means that they *may*

Re: Licenses for DebConf6 [was: Re: DebConf6: Call For Papers]

2005-11-08 Thread Andreas Schuldei
* Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-11-08 00:28:07]: The authors have the freedom to pick a DFSG-free license means that they *may* do so, but are not required to. Am I correct? IMHO, DebConf paper authors should be *required* to publish in a DFSG-free manner, as a condition for

Licenses for DebConf6 [was: Re: DebConf6: Call For Papers]

2005-11-07 Thread Francesco Poli
[Added Cc: debian-legal, because the topic may be of interest there, I would say.] [No need to Cc: me, as long as you keep Cc:ing debian-legal (just to make things clear: I am subscribed to debian-legal, but not to debian-devel)] On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 10:01:48 +0100 Andreas Schuldei wrote:

Re: Licenses for DebConf6 [was: Re: DebConf6: Call For Papers]

2005-11-07 Thread Brian M. Carlson
On Monday 07 November 2005 11:28 pm, Francesco Poli wrote: [Added Cc: debian-legal, because the topic may be of interest there, I would say.] [No need to Cc: me, as long as you keep Cc:ing debian-legal (just to make things clear: I am subscribed to debian-legal, but not to debian-devel)]

OT: Humor: Re: Licenses for DebConf6 [was: Re: DebConf6: Call For Papers]

2005-11-07 Thread Adam Heath
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005, Brian M. Carlson wrote: The way I read it was that the authors may pick any license, so long as it's DFSG-free. Do you see how it could be read that way? You sound just like Henry Ford. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe.

Re: OT: Humor: Re: Licenses for DebConf6 [was: Re: DebConf6: Call For Papers]

2005-11-07 Thread Brian M. Carlson
On Tuesday 08 November 2005 01:58 am, Adam Heath wrote: On Tue, 8 Nov 2005, Brian M. Carlson wrote: The way I read it was that the authors may pick any license, so long as it's DFSG-free. Do you see how it could be read that way? You sound just like Henry Ford. My goal was to do exactly