Le vendredi 11 février 2011 à 19:33 +0100, Axel Beckert a écrit :
Kicking out good and unique software, only because of missing or
incomplete UTF-8 support, will surely lower Debian's quality more than
missing or broken UTF-8 support in very few packages. And it would
make those users (and
Josselin Mouette writes (Re: Make Unicode bugs release critical? (was: Re:
RFA: all my packages)):
Kicking out software that doesn?t work at all in UTF-8 locales and
requires the user to set a broken locale, OTOH, sounds like a sanitary
emergency.
Excellent, I look forward to the removal
* Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk, 2011-02-14, 12:42:
Kicking out software that doesn?t work at all in UTF-8 locales and
requires the user to set a broken locale, OTOH, sounds like a sanitary
emergency.
Excellent, I look forward to the removal of python. I always hated
that
Le lundi 14 février 2011 à 12:42 +, Ian Jackson a écrit :
Josselin Mouette writes (Re: Make Unicode bugs release critical? (was: Re:
RFA: all my packages)):
Kicking out software that doesn?t work at all in UTF-8 locales and
requires the user to set a broken locale, OTOH, sounds like
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011, Josselin Mouette wrote:
You must specify the encoding of your data in your bitstreams. I agree
this is inconvenient (and one of the things I dislike in Python), but it
is:
1. completely independent of the locale (UTF8 or not)
2. easy to work with once you
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 02:01:08PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
As long as python 3 is compiled to use UCS-4 as the internal
representation, you mean. Are our packages set to use UCS-4?
At least for python 3.1, yes:
common_configure_args = \
--prefix=/usr \
Hi,
Adam Borowski wrote:
Speaking of rxvt... shouldn't this clusterϫϫck become the only rxvt in
Debian? Both rxvt and rxvt-beta, completely dead upstream for 10 and 8
years respectively, besides having terrible support for terminal codes lack
even such a tiny detail as UTF-8 support.
I'd
7 matches
Mail list logo
