Joerg Jaspert jo...@ganneff.de writes:
Additionally we will support new architectures like armhf, sparc64,
powerpc64, sh4 and s390x in case someone does the neccessary
groundwork needed prior to an inclusion, and gets all the needed
preconditions settled. If porters want to discuss
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:50:31AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
At that point, exactly why should you not upload the entire thing?
In most parts of the world you actually have to pay for data transfer.
So why transfer something that is not going to be used at all?
Bastian
--
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:19:32PM +, Philipp Kern wrote:
I talked with Joerg at the meeting and we agreed that arch-based admin
keyrings aren't needed. If you feel so strongly about it, I think you
should take it up yourself and make [0] support one keyring per arch.
Why do you want one
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:54:21AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:50:31AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
At that point, exactly why should you not upload the entire thing?
In most parts of the world you actually have to pay for data transfer.
So why
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:55:39AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:19:32PM +, Philipp Kern wrote:
I talked with Joerg at the meeting and we agreed that arch-based admin
keyrings aren't needed. If you feel so strongly about it, I think you
should take it up
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:16:00PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:55:39AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
Why do you want one keyring per arch? What problem are you trying to
solve with this?
I think it's called principle of least privilege. Of course we could also let
On Monday 28 March 2011 19:43:52 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
So, we have to either accept source-only uploads with the knowledge that
some people will upload even more crap, or don't accept source-only
uploads at all. There is no punishment for the bad uploader option,
anyone proposing
On 03/28/2011 07:05 PM, Philipp Kern wrote:
I think people who screw up repeatedly even after being told to be careful
should have their upload privileges suspended at the discretion of the
ftp-masters. We had that in the past as well. Then source-only uploads
shouldn't be a problem.
That
On ti, 2011-03-29 at 09:52 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
And as you have to test-build your packages anyway the only reason I see
why you wouldn't be able to upload them is a very slow connection to the
rest of the world.
Bandwidth quotas would be another reason. (I have no opinion on whether
Bernd Zeimetz be...@bzed.de (29/03/2011):
And as you have to test-build your packages anyway the only reason I
see why you wouldn't be able to upload them is a very slow
connection to the rest of the world.
One can test-build in her own, non-chroot environment, and still be
cautious about what
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011, Dominique Dumont wrote:
On Monday 28 March 2011 19:43:52 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
So, we have to either accept source-only uploads with the knowledge that
some people will upload even more crap, or don't accept source-only
uploads at all. There is no
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:19:32PM +, Philipp Kern wrote:
On 2011-03-28, Wouter Verhelst w...@uter.be wrote:
But I'd think that making sure this buildd host can still do uploads in
a timely manner when the key expires is pretty well inside the realm of
the buildd admin's responsibility.
Note that it isn't entirely clear to me how splitting up keyrings per
architecture would help there, so some explanation might help (if I want
to make sure that whatever patch I come up with actually solves the
issue at hand...).
You need to check on which site you luck. Lets take it that
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:56:28AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
- The long standing project of enabling autosigning for the buildds also
got finished. That means that packages successfully built can now be
uploaded automatically, without waiting for the buildd admin to wake
up/come back
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:56:28AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
Hello world,
as previously announced[1] we had a FTPMaster meeting in the
LinuxHotel[2] in Essen during the week from March 21st till 27th. While
there have been[3] quite[4] a number[5] of blog[6] posts[7] about this
meeting[8],
Hi
- The long standing project of enabling autosigning for the buildds also
got finished. That means that packages successfully built can now be
uploaded automatically, without waiting for the buildd admin to wake
up/come back from holiday/whatever. The rules for this are simple
*
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:25:13AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:56:28AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
- The long standing project of enabling autosigning for the buildds also
got finished. That means that packages successfully built can now be
uploaded
On Mon, 28, Mar, 2011 at 11:54:29AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli spoke thus..
Related to this, in your agendas you did mention the topic of throwaway
DD built .debs. I understand from the minutes that no specific hacking
on that has been done (understandably given how much other stuff has
been
On 03/28/2011 04:37 PM, Mark Hymers wrote:
The main decision which needs to be made is whether, as a project, we
want source only uploads or to throw away DD built non-all debs.
There's not entire agreement amongst the ftpmasters about this (I err on
the side of the source-only uploads to
On 2011-03-28, Bernd Zeimetz be...@bzed.de wrote:
On 03/28/2011 04:37 PM, Mark Hymers wrote:
The main decision which needs to be made is whether, as a project, we
want source only uploads or to throw away DD built non-all debs.
There's not entire agreement amongst the ftpmasters about this (I
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
On 03/28/2011 04:37 PM, Mark Hymers wrote:
The main decision which needs to be made is whether, as a project, we
want source only uploads or to throw away DD built non-all debs.
There's not entire agreement amongst the ftpmasters about this (I err
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 01:26:02PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
Hi
- The long standing project of enabling autosigning for the buildds also
got finished. That means that packages successfully built can now be
uploaded automatically, without waiting for the buildd admin to wake
Hi Phil,
[ Note: re-reading, I find that my mail could be read as heated, which
it wasn't meant to be. I'm firm in what I believe needs to be done, but
not angry :-) ]
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 03:08:12PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
So, AIUI, only members of the wbadm GID can change keys, not any
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Mark Hymers wrote:
The main decision which needs to be made is whether, as a project,
we want source only uploads or to throw away DD built non-all debs.
There are two separate decisions here.
One is whether we throw away DD built debs (non-all, or
everything.[0])
The
On 2011-03-28, Wouter Verhelst w...@uter.be wrote:
But I'd think that making sure this buildd host can still do uploads in
a timely manner when the key expires is pretty well inside the realm of
the buildd admin's responsibility.
And manual signing wouldn't be timely?
I talked with Joerg at
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:56:28AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
Just wanted to say congratulations to you all for for getting so much
great stuff done in such a short time, and many thanks for all your
hard work; it's much appreciated!
- The long standing project of enabling autosigning for the
Hi,
are there any news about leaf packages and the new field mainpackage:?
If so, will Wheezy contain packages using this new field?
Did you decide about throwing away DD built binaries?
* Joerg Jaspert [2011-03-27 10:56 +0200]:
- We had some discussion about accepting ddebs into the archive
On 2011-03-27, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote:
- The long standing project of enabling autosigning for the buildds also
got finished. That means that packages successfully built can now be
uploaded automatically, without waiting for the buildd admin to wake
up/come back from
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 12:27:15PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:56:28AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
- The long standing project of enabling autosigning for the buildds also
got finished. That means that packages successfully built can now be
uploaded
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
- As there have been intermittent problems with the current tool which
generates the pdiff files (on occasion causing us to have to restart
the whole diff series), we looked into improving the situation. We
finally came up with the idea to store
30 matches
Mail list logo
