On Sun, 2002-12-01 at 19:09, Matthias Klose wrote:
Or else include a precompiled version of the docs into your diff
file.
Hm, I don't think I like this. The gif images aren't the preferred form
of modification. Would we accept it if someone had a program written in
a language which only had
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 01:09:42AM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
Or else include a precompiled version of the docs into your diff
file.
Hm, I don't think I like this. The gif images aren't the preferred form
of modification. Would we accept it if someone had a program written in
a
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 12:27:09PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
Hm, I don't think I like this. The gif images aren't the preferred form
of modification. Would we accept it if someone had a program written in
a language which only had a non-free compiler, then uploaded source
packages to
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 02:55:50PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
Hm, I don't think I like this. The gif images aren't the preferred form
of modification. Would we accept it if someone had a program written in
a language which only had a non-free compiler, then uploaded source
On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 06:27, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 01:09:42AM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
Or else include a precompiled version of the docs into your diff
file.
Hm, I don't think I like this. The gif images aren't the preferred form
of modification. Would we
Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 02:55:50PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
Hm, I don't think I like this. The gif images aren't the preferred form
of modification. Would we accept it if someone had a program written in
a language which only had a
Chris Leishman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 01:09:54AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
snip
Look, if doxygen can be configured for your packages not using dot. Or
else include a precompiled version of the docs into your diff
file. Adapt your rules in a way, that it can
Hi all,
The recently released version of libxml++ (0.16.0) includes doxygen
documentation produced from the code (to html), so I created a -doc
package for this. However, doxygen wanted to use dot to create some
of the images for the documentation. Problem with that is that dot is
from the
Chris Leishman writes:
Hi all,
The recently released version of libxml++ (0.16.0) includes doxygen
documentation produced from the code (to html), so I created a -doc
package for this. However, doxygen wanted to use dot to create some
of the images for the documentation. Problem with that
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 01:09:54AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
snip
Look, if doxygen can be configured for your packages not using dot. Or
else include a precompiled version of the docs into your diff
file. Adapt your rules in a way, that it can fall back to the
precompiled version, if the
10 matches
Mail list logo
