Re: Packaging MATE for Debian

2012-12-03 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 03 décembre 2012 à 02:06 +0100, Adam Borowski a écrit : You can use the upstream packaging, available at: deb http://packages.mate-desktop.org/repo/debian wheezy main I see this still includes all s/gnome/mate/ libraries from GNOME 2, while their counterparts are still here in Debian

Re: Packaging MATE for Debian

2012-12-03 Thread Stefano Karapetsas
Il 03/12/2012 19:46, Josselin Mouette ha scritto: Le lundi 03 décembre 2012 à 02:06 +0100, Adam Borowski a écrit : You can use the upstream packaging, available at: deb http://packages.mate-desktop.org/repo/debian wheezy main I see this still includes all s/gnome/mate/ libraries from GNOME 2,

Re: Packaging MATE for Debian

2012-12-03 Thread Jeremy Bicha
On 3 December 2012 14:28, Stefano Karapetsas stef...@karapetsas.com wrote: As I already said you many times, MATE no longer uses these obsolete and duplicated libraries. And, maybe you dont know, but we are already working with GNOME developers to share efforts with them. Just some examples:

Re: Packaging MATE for Debian

2012-12-03 Thread Jon Dowland
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 03:39:03PM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote: What's so bad about evince that you need to use a forked version anyway? Or gnome-icon-theme, gnome-keyring, gnome-terminal, etc. This is drifting off the topic at hand, please, take it to another list if you want to continue down

Re: Packaging MATE for Debian

2012-12-03 Thread Jon Dowland
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 02:06:03AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: You can use the upstream packaging, available at: deb http://packages.mate-desktop.org/repo/debian wheezy main Thanks but I'm interested in possibly helping an effort to package MATE in Debian, rather than run it myself. So from

Re: Packaging MATE for Debian

2012-12-03 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Jeremy Bicha wrote on 2012-12-03 15:39: What's so bad about evince that you need to use a forked version anyway? Or gnome-icon-theme, gnome-keyring, gnome-terminal, etc. And in the same way: why mdm instead of gdm ? I have created some updates of gdm with the same patches as mdm, but without

Re: Packaging MATE for Debian

2012-12-03 Thread Stefano Karapetsas
Il 03/12/2012 22:33, Joachim Wiedorn ha scritto: And in the same way: why mdm instead of gdm ? MDM is not part of MATE Desktop. Cheers, Stefano -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Packaging MATE for Debian

2012-12-03 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 03 décembre 2012 à 20:28 +0100, Stefano Karapetsas a écrit : That repository contains the current stable MATE. The repository with develpment MATE packages, without obsolete libraries, is deb http://dev.mate-desktop.org/debian wheezy main Our github repo with debian folders, in

Re: Packaging MATE for Debian

2012-12-03 Thread Stefano Karapetsas
Hi Joss, thank you for your feedback. Il 04/12/2012 00:05, Josselin Mouette ha scritto: This still includes seemingly useless forks of: - libwnck, still in Debian We forked libwnck for three main reasons: to have stable API, to keep GTK2 support, and to add new features on it (we already

Re: Packaging MATE for Debian

2012-12-03 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 04 décembre 2012 à 00:37 +0100, Stefano Karapetsas a écrit : - libwnck, still in Debian We forked libwnck for three main reasons: to have stable API, to keep GTK2 support, and to add new features on it (we already started to do this). The GTK2 libwnck version will not change API,

Re: Packaging MATE for Debian

2012-12-02 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hey, On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:22:52AM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: I'd therefore like to ask if anyone here would be willing to help me to get MATE into Debian for Jessie. I'd like to ping back and see if there's anyone here who'd be interested in joining me to package MATE for

Re: Packaging MATE for Debian

2012-12-02 Thread Jon Dowland
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 01:26:50PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: Hey, On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:22:52AM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: I'd therefore like to ask if anyone here would be willing to help me to get MATE into Debian for Jessie. I'd like to ping back and

Re: Packaging MATE for Debian

2012-12-02 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 10:21:43PM +, Jon Dowland wrote: On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 01:26:50PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: Hey, On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:22:52AM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: I'd therefore like to ask if anyone here would be willing to help me

Re: Packaging MATE for Debian

2012-12-02 Thread Adam Borowski
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 10:21:43PM +, Jon Dowland wrote: On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 01:26:50PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:22:52AM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: I'd therefore like to ask if anyone here would be willing to help me to get

Packaging MATE for Debian

2012-11-21 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi, after following up with the discussion on MATE on this list, I think we have a consens that there are many people who'd be in favor to getting MATE into Debian. As Debian Wheezy is already in the freeze, MATE won't undeniably be a part of it. Even if we still weren't in the freeze, I still

Re: Packaging MATE for Debian

2012-11-21 Thread Jon Dowland
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:22:52AM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: I'd therefore like to ask if anyone here would be willing to help me to get MATE into Debian for Jessie. As you know, there is already an effort to package MATE ongoing (at least #658783). The purpose of ITPs is to

Re: Re: Packaging MATE for Debian

2012-11-21 Thread Stefano Karapetsas
Also as you aren't the filer or owner of that ITP please make sure anything you do is agreeable to the actual ITP owner. I'm the current ITP owner, and an upstream MATE developer too. I alread talked with Adrian some weeks ago and I would be happy to move MATE packaging on an appropriate