Re: Questions about apt-get upgrade/install semantic

2005-05-11 Thread Martin Braure de Calignon
Gunnar Wolf a écrit : It is not only that - It is because apt-get is an infrastructure manager, not an individual package manager. dpkg does work on single packages, but apt-get works on the whole collection - and it could lead to inconsistencies if you let apt-get do a half-assed job and

Re: Questions about apt-get upgrade/install semantic

2005-05-10 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Daniel J. Axtens dijo [Fri, May 06, 2005 at 01:36:06PM +0800]: and not apt-get upgrade package Possibly because apt-get upgrade is used to upgrade the whole system, not just one package. My guess is that the developers didn't want to overload the upgrade command. It is not only that - It

Re: Questions about apt-get upgrade/install semantic

2005-05-06 Thread Martin Braure de Calignon
Daniel J. Axtens a écrit : and not apt-get upgrade package Possibly because apt-get upgrade is used to upgrade the whole system, not just one package. My guess is that the developers didn't want to overload the upgrade command. HTH, Daniel Yes, ok for that. But when I want to upgrade

Re: Questions about apt-get upgrade/install semantic

2005-05-06 Thread Guido Heumann
Martin Braure de Calignon schrieb: Daniel J. Axtens a écrit : and not apt-get upgrade package Possibly because apt-get upgrade is used to upgrade the whole system, not just one package. My guess is that the developers didn't want to overload the upgrade command. HTH, Daniel Yes,

Re: Questions about apt-get upgrade/install semantic

2005-05-06 Thread Martin Braure de Calignon
Guido Heumann a écrit : Martin Braure de Calignon schrieb: Daniel J. Axtens a écrit : and not apt-get upgrade package Possibly because apt-get upgrade is used to upgrade the whole system, not just one package. My guess is that the developers didn't want to overload the

Re: Questions about apt-get upgrade/install semantic

2005-05-06 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Friday 06 May 2005 06:04 am, Martin Braure de Calignon wrote: Yes, ok for that. But when I want to upgrade a package, it is not really logical to use install, because the package is already installed, no ? Yes. Daniel -- /--- Daniel Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Questions about apt-get upgrade/install semantic

2005-05-05 Thread Martin Braure de Calignon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello DDs, I wonder why when you want to upgrade one package, you have to do : apt-get install package and not apt-get upgrade package Is there a reason for that ? It makes me more sens to upgrade the package when I want to upgrade it... No ?

Questions about apt-get upgrade/install semantic

2005-05-05 Thread Daniel J. Axtens
and not apt-get upgrade package Possibly because apt-get upgrade is used to upgrade the whole system, not just one package. My guess is that the developers didn't want to overload the upgrade command. HTH, Daniel -- Neuronstorm: neuronstorm.sourceforge.net The Neuronstorm Blog: