Hi Luca,
sorry about the Cc, but eye-balling -devel didn't reveal much activity
from you, so I'm not sure if you track the list. M-F-T is set to d-d.
I propose to restructure the vim package so that it builds fewer vim
variants.
I propose to have only the following:
vim (aka
* Marcelo E. Magallon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At the moment:
* Perl is lost (that threaded thing)
As one of the new Co-Maintainers, I'm going to upload the package from
http://p.d.o/~nobse/vim/ to experimental this evening.
The perl issue is fixed in this package.
* Can't
On Sunday 15 June 2003 17:39, Marc Wilson wrote:
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 11:23:34AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
What about a version _with_ all non-threaded interpreters, but _without_
gtk2/kde support?
That would be console Vim, from either package. The GUI doesn't add so
much to it
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
Hello people,
I propose to restructure the vim package so that it builds fewer vim
variants.
I propose to have only the following:
vim (aka vim-tiny; no interpreters, no docs)
kvim (including all non-threaded interpreters; kde support; no
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Luca Filipozzi wrote:
Hello people,
I propose to restructure the vim package so that it builds fewer vim
variants.
I propose to have only the following:
vim (aka vim-tiny; no interpreters, no docs)
kvim (including all non-threaded interpreters; kde
5 matches
Mail list logo