* Josselin Mouette
| /usr/lib/libgconf2-4/gconf-sanity-check-2: error while loading shared
| libraries: libpangocairo-1.0.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such
| file or dir
|
| Ladies and gentlemen, this is a perfect example of why linking indirect
| dependencies is a very bad thing.
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 03:09:34PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le vendredi 06 janvier 2006 à 14:28 -0600, Alejandro Bonilla a écrit :
/usr/lib/libgconf2-4/gconf-sanity-check-2: error while loading shared
libraries: libpangocairo-1.0.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such
file or
Le lundi 09 janvier 2006 à 14:41 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen a écrit :
| Ladies and gentlemen, this is a perfect example of why linking indirect
| dependencies is a very bad thing. Let me explain.
No, it's not. At least not in the way GTK friends work.
Why so?
| Of all binaries shipped with
Le lundi 09 janvier 2006 à 15:45 +0100, Kurt Roeckx a écrit :
Linking indirect dependency isn't a good thing, but not linking
to them isn't magicly going to fix bugs like this.
How so? Please show me a case where the bug will still be here.
You should _never_ exclude anything for the
* Josselin Mouette
| Le lundi 09 janvier 2006 à 14:41 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen a écrit :
| | Ladies and gentlemen, this is a perfect example of why linking indirect
| | dependencies is a very bad thing. Let me explain.
|
| No, it's not. At least not in the way GTK friends work.
|
| Why so?
Le lundi 09 janvier 2006 à 16:42 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen a écrit :
Because GTK exports and depends on the definitions of GLib (and pango,
in this case) types, so if any of those definitions change, you must
get the right ones.
That's why GTK itself depends on GLib and pango. I don't get your
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 16:10 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le lundi 09 janvier 2006 à 15:45 +0100, Kurt Roeckx a écrit :
Linking indirect dependency isn't a good thing, but not linking
to them isn't magicly going to fix bugs like this.
How so? Please show me a case where the bug will still
On Monday, 9 January 2006 19:26, Ron Johnson wrote:
The gconf-sanity-check functionality is optional. As such, its
Why is gconf-sanity-check optional? It seems pretty vital to me.
AFAIK only gdm (or gnome-settings-daemon) uses gconf-sanity-check and both
depend on libgtk2.0-0.
Best regards
[Re-sending, my previous reply didn't made it.]
Le lundi 09 janvier 2006 à 15:45 +0100, Kurt Roeckx a écrit :
Linking indirect dependency isn't a good thing, but not linking
to them isn't magicly going to fix bugs like this.
How so? Please show me a case where the bug will still be here.
You
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 19:50 +0100, Isaac Clerencia wrote:
On Monday, 9 January 2006 19:26, Ron Johnson wrote:
The gconf-sanity-check functionality is optional. As such, its
Why is gconf-sanity-check optional? It seems pretty vital to me.
AFAIK only gdm (or gnome-settings-daemon) uses
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 04:42:05PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
* Josselin Mouette
| Le lundi 09 janvier 2006 à 14:41 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen a écrit :
| | Ladies and gentlemen, this is a perfect example of why linking indirect
| | dependencies is a very bad thing. Let me explain.
|
|
Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
I just upgraded Sid and rebooted, after that, logging into Gnome told me if I
wanted to migrate to a Single file that will give me better performance, so of
course I said yes. It logged me off and everytime that I need to log back in,
it kicks me out.
I don't have any
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
/usr/lib/libgconf2-4/gconf-sanity-check-2: error while loading shared
libraries: libpangocairo-1.0.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such
file or dir
gconf-sanity-check-2 did not pass, logging back out
I've filed a serious
Le vendredi 06 janvier 2006 à 14:28 -0600, Alejandro Bonilla a écrit :
Hi,
I just upgraded Sid and rebooted, after that, logging into Gnome told me if I
wanted to migrate to a Single file that will give me better performance, so of
course I said yes. It logged me off and everytime that I
Alejandro Bonilla [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
/usr/lib/libgconf2-4/gconf-sanity-check-2: error while loading shared
libraries: libpangocairo-1.0.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such
file or dir
gconf-sanity-check-2 did not pass, logging back out
Fun! :-/
Which package gets the bug
15 matches
Mail list logo
