On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 05:00:13PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
There's certainly time to communicate with the Release Manager that
the package should no longer be considered a removal candidate.
The way to do that is to fix all the release critical bugs filed against
the package, and upload to
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 11:32:31PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 05:00:13PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
There's certainly time to communicate with the Release Manager that
the package should no longer be considered a removal candidate.
The way to do that is to fix
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 03:18:49PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 11:32:31PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 05:00:13PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
There's certainly time to communicate with the Release Manager that
the package should no longer
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 01:49:29PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
No, this points to a problem with the bug list as seen by the testing
scripts. update_excuses for gjdoc says
gjdoc (source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc,
s390, sparc) is buggy! (1 0)
which is
W licie z pi, 12-12-2003, godz. 07:30, BugScan reporter pisze:
Some bugs have an additional set of tags indicating they only apply
to a particular release: O for oldstable (potato), S for stable (woody),
T for testing (sarge) or U for unstable (sid). X indicates that the package
is not in
Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Scripsit Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BugScan reporter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: chrony (debian/main)
Maintainer: John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[REMOVE]
223134 [] chrony: FTBFS: Errors in kernel headers
I think the distinction between sid RC bugs and all RC bugs was removed
at some point, without telling us. Take a look at the gjdoc package -
there are two RC bugs tagged sarge and one tagged sid, but the testing
scripts are not upgrading the version in testing, even though it would
close two rc
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 09:36:46AM +, Mark Howard wrote:
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 01:13:23AM -0500, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
The thing is that #215314 has tag: sid bacause it only applies to
unstable version (upstream release is on its way and will close it).
Version in testing is
Bug stamp-out list for Dec 12 06:01 (CST)
Total number of release-critical bugs: 689
Number that will disappear after removing packages marked [REMOVE]: 44
Number that have a patch: 106
Number that have a fix prepared and waiting to upload: 32
Number that are being ignored: 17
Number on packages
BugScan reporter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: chrony (debian/main)
Maintainer: John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[REMOVE]
223134 [] chrony: FTBFS: Errors in kernel headers
Why is chrony getting removed?
Package: defrag (debian/main)
Maintainer: Timshel Knoll [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Scripsit Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BugScan reporter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: chrony (debian/main)
Maintainer: John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[REMOVE]
223134 [] chrony: FTBFS: Errors in kernel headers
Why is chrony getting removed?
AFAIU, the [REMOVE]
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 09:34:12PM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
Scripsit Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BugScan reporter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: chrony (debian/main)
Maintainer: John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[REMOVE]
223134 [] chrony: FTBFS: Errors in
12 matches
Mail list logo
