* GOTO Masanori ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030829 11:05]:
I may need to explain the status glibc:
[...]
The current version is 2.3.2-4. We're working for fixing bugs,
some bugs were resolved.
Sorry, I didn't want to step on your feet. I know that glibc is a
nasty beast, and you're really good at
At Thu, 28 Aug 2003 10:24:15 +0200,
Andreas Barth wrote:
Really? The latest glibc in sarge is from 2003-03-22, and there are
currently 1103 packages waiting for glibc.
I may need to explain the status glibc:
2003-03-22 glibc is 2.3.1-17. The next version of glibc is 2.3.2-2,
which was
* Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030828 03:50]:
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We've often had whining here about sid breaking something production
critical. Well, sid is not meant to be used for that, but enough
people do. (In other words: I don't trust the users enough
* Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030828 13:20]:
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Really? The latest glibc in sarge is from 2003-03-22, and there are
currently 1103 packages waiting for glibc.
What has that got to do with anything?
This was the part of the mail were we
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030828 03:50]:
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We've often had whining here about sid breaking something production
critical. Well, sid is not meant to be used for that, but enough
people do.
* Mark Howard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030826 21:35]:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 03:46:33PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
the system. (And, I don't believe that a proposal with so many changes
to the pool and mirror system has a real chance to be implemented.)
Why do you need many changes?
Because
* Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030826 21:50]:
Mark Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 10:25:24AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
So speak up Mark, what do you mean with changed?
I meant identifying that bug X was fixed in version Y; packages in
* Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030826 21:50]:
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030826 15:20]:
Only those contained in the sections enabled on the users system. If
you have experimental-core and experimental-gnome all gnome
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030826 21:50]:
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This mass-introduces bugs reports of glibc-bugs to other packages. No,
glibc (and the other core parts) must be the most conservative part of
If
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 12:18:54AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Mark Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BTS Support for tracking when bugs were changed
- AFAIK, already been worked on
This will be more important when there are a large number
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 07:42:13PM +0100, Mark Howard wrote: Hello,
I'm glad to hear so many people agreeing with the RM's plans and even
more glad to see so many things being done to make this seem plausible!
I'm one of those developers who has cvs and other unrealeasable packages
in
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 10:25:24AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 12:18:54AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Mark Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BTS Support for tracking when bugs were changed
- AFAIK, already
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 07:42:13PM +0100, Mark Howard wrote: Hello,
If we don't rebuild every dependant package in the experimental pool,
we need then to have a way to eventually retrigger the build of every
dependant package once it reaches unstable.
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 10:25:24AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
So speak up Mark, what do you mean with changed?
I meant identifying that bug X was fixed in version Y; packages in
experimental contain the fix but sid and testing packages do not (yet).
I think this feature would be even
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 11:17:48AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 07:42:13PM +0100, Mark Howard wrote: Hello,
If we don't rebuild every dependant package in the experimental pool,
we need then to have a way to eventually
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 11:17:48AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 07:42:13PM +0100, Mark Howard wrote: Hello,
If we don't rebuild every dependant package in the experimental pool,
* Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030826 15:20]:
Only those contained in the sections enabled on the users system. If
you have experimental-core and experimental-gnome all gnome debs
should be comnpiled against the experimental glibc for example.
This mass-introduces bugs reports of
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 03:46:33PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
the system. (And, I don't believe that a proposal with so many changes
to the pool and mirror system has a real chance to be implemented.)
Why do you need many changes?
All the packages could go in the pool and you'd just need a few
Mark Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 10:25:24AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
So speak up Mark, what do you mean with changed?
I meant identifying that bug X was fixed in version Y; packages in
experimental contain the fix but sid and testing packages do not
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030826 15:20]:
Only those contained in the sections enabled on the users system. If
you have experimental-core and experimental-gnome all gnome debs
should be comnpiled against the experimental glibc for
Hello,
I'm glad to hear so many people agreeing with the RM's plans and even
more glad to see so many things being done to make this seem plausible!
I'm one of those developers who has cvs and other unrealeasable packages
in sid. I agree with the comments about moving these to experimental,
Mark Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BTS Support for tracking when bugs were changed
- AFAIK, already been worked on
This will be more important when there are a large number of
users/testers using different distributions - sid and experimental.
changed? The time since the last message was
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 12:18:54AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Mark Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BTS Support for tracking when bugs were changed
- AFAIK, already been worked on
This will be more important when there are a large number of
users/testers using different
23 matches
Mail list logo
