On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 03:28:30PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Apparently, developers have a strong tendency to not fix these bugs the
correct way and instead, to make packages depend on e.g.
python-gtkmozembed | python-gnome2-extras
Could you expand on this point?
The question has just
Le jeudi 09 avril 2009 à 14:24 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire a écrit :
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 03:28:30PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Apparently, developers have a strong tendency to not fix these bugs the
correct way and instead, to make packages depend on e.g.
python-gtkmozembed |
Le lundi 16 mars 2009 à 14:08 +0100, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
3. GNOME-PYTHON-EXTRAS
What is happening in unstable:
* egg.trayicon, gtkhtml2 and gtkmozembed each have their own
binary package (python-eggtrayicon, python-gtkhtml2,
python-gtkmozembed)
* gksu 1.X
Hi Joss,
Josselin Mouette wrote:
1. GNOME-PYTHON
I propose to file wishlist bugs on the packages that can move to using
python-gconf.
2. GNOME-PYTHON-DESKTOP
I propose to file important bugs on all packages depending on
python-gnome2-desktop, making them RC once the package is removed
Hi,
the gnome-python, gnome-python-desktop and gnome-python-extras packages
are collections of Python modules that are not necessarily related. It
was more and more requested to split them more logically, and this is
what I have done now that upstream plans are a bit clearer.
According to the
Clement Lorteau northern_lig...@users.sourceforge.net
gtkvncviewer
I filed #518000 a while ago about this, heh. But the bug report needs
updating to say that python-gconf exists on its own, and that
gtkvncviewer should depend on that instead of python-gnome2.
Cheers,
--
- Are you sure
6 matches
Mail list logo
