Hello!
> For me, this whole situation seems wrong though. Why do you have
> versioned package names (mariadb-server-*) when they are all mutually
> exclusive with one another due to all shipping the same binary?
This is how the MySQL packaging has been structured for the past 10
years or so.
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 07:12:18AM -0700, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> apt install --with-source ./Packages -s mariadb-server mariadb-client
> libmariadbclient18
I just want to add here, that --with-source also works with other apt
commands like "upgrade". Depending on what you want to test, it might
Hi Otto,
Quoting Otto Kekäläinen (2021-03-24 17:37:46)
> I've noticed I've spent quite a lot of time debugging various situations
> where the debian/control definitions for
> depends/breaks/replaces/conflicts/provides are not optimal.
>
> The waste of time is two-fold:
>
> 1) apt is not verbose
Thanks David, using --with-sources is exactly what I needed.
As a starting point I have the *.deb I've built. In the same directory
I create a Packages file with:
apt-ftparchive packages . > ./Packages
Then I install using it:
apt install --with-source ./Packages -s mariadb-server mariadb-client
On Wed, 24 Mar 2021, Otto Kek?l?inen wrote:
Hello!
I've noticed I've spent quite a lot of time debugging various
situations where the debian/control definitions for
depends/breaks/replaces/conflicts/provides are not optimal.
The waste of time is two-fold:
1) apt is not verbose enough
2) the
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 12:37:46PM -0400, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> As an example of 1, sometimes I see this:
>
> apt install mariadb-client
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> mariadb-client : Depends: mariadb-client-10.5 (>= 1:10.5.10) but it
> is not going to be installed
>
>
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 12:37:46PM -0400, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> I've noticed I've spent quite a lot of time debugging various
> situations where the debian/control definitions for
> depends/breaks/replaces/conflicts/provides are not optimal.
Thanks for asking about this, I could also use some
Hello!
I've noticed I've spent quite a lot of time debugging various
situations where the debian/control definitions for
depends/breaks/replaces/conflicts/provides are not optimal.
The waste of time is two-fold:
1) apt is not verbose enough
2) the cycle to rebuild/tests is too slow
As an
8 matches
Mail list logo
