Re: {SPAM} Re: Trying to reach consensus - Yet Another Alternate Proposal to Declassification of debian-private

2005-12-08 Thread Daniel Ruoso
Em Qui, 2005-12-08 às 00:08 +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin escreveu: On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 02:47:07PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote: The first type of publication could embrace the entire content of debian-private, but restrictions will be applied for those who want to read, basically, the need of

Re: Trying to reach consensus - Yet Another Alternate Proposal to Declassification of debian-private

2005-12-08 Thread Daniel Ruoso
Em Qui, 2005-12-08 às 01:39 +0100, Wouter Verhelst escreveu: On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 02:47:07PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote: I hope this is closer to a consensus... Afraid not. This proposal basically creates a second class of people -- those who we want to sign NDA's to be able to read stuff.

Re: {SPAM} Re: Trying to reach consensus - Yet Another Alternate Proposal to Declassification of debian-private

2005-12-08 Thread Daniel Ruoso
Em Qui, 2005-12-08 às 08:07 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane escreveu: On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 01:39:15AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 02:47:07PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote: The first type of publication could embrace the entire content of debian-private, but restrictions

Re: Trying to reach consensus - Yet Another Alternate Proposal to Declassification of debian-private

2005-12-08 Thread Anthony Towns
Followups set to -vote; can we please keep this on the list that's designed for these discussions? On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 11:24:52AM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote: There's a lot of personal information inside debian-private, There is? I got 36 of 494 messages (7%) for the month I did, with an

Trying to reach consensus - Yet Another Alternate Proposal to Declassification of debian-private

2005-12-07 Thread Daniel Ruoso
Hi, I'll try to move forward in the direction of a more consensual proposal about the declassification. In this discussion, two points were made clear to me: 1) It would be really nice to have the d-p archives available to those who want to understand better how debian works, and from this

Re: Trying to reach consensus - Yet Another Alternate Proposal to Declassification of debian-private

2005-12-07 Thread mjr
Daniel Ruoso: I'll try to move forward in the direction of a more consensual proposal about the declassification.=20 In this discussion, two points were made clear to me: You do not mention the copyright and ethical problems, but the proposal seems to address them, near enough. Is the OP

Re: Trying to reach consensus - Yet Another Alternate Proposal to Declassification of debian-private

2005-12-07 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 02:47:07PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote: So, my conclusion is that it would be nice to have two types of publications: 1) Selected Readers 2) Selected Content The first type of publication could embrace the entire content of debian-private, but restrictions will be

Re: Trying to reach consensus - Yet Another Alternate Proposal to Declassification of debian-private

2005-12-07 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 02:47:07PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote: Hi, I'll try to move forward in the direction of a more consensual proposal about the declassification. In this discussion, two points were made clear to me: 1) It would be really nice to have the d-p archives available to

Re: Trying to reach consensus - Yet Another Alternate Proposal to Declassification of debian-private

2005-12-07 Thread Robert Collins
On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 00:08 +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 02:47:07PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote: So, my conclusion is that it would be nice to have two types of publications: 1) Selected Readers 2) Selected Content The first type of publication could

Re: Trying to reach consensus - Yet Another Alternate Proposal to Declassification of debian-private

2005-12-07 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 01:39:15AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 02:47:07PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote: I'll try to move forward in the direction of a more consensual proposal about the declassification. So, my conclusion is that it would be nice to have two types of