Re: UDD access from Alioth(s children) (Was: Alioth status update, take 3)

2011-06-16 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 09:03:25PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote: Thanks. Some findings about this: Formerly a plain service=udd was working as convenience. Is it planned to put the pg_service.conf into place again? That way the backend connection could be transparently switched (though, my

Re: UDD access from Alioth(s children) (Was: Alioth status update, take 3)

2011-06-16 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 16/06/11 at 13:36 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 09:03:25PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote: Thanks. Some findings about this: Formerly a plain service=udd was working as convenience. Is it planned to put the pg_service.conf into place again? That way the backend

Re: UDD access from Alioth(s children) (Was: Alioth status update, take 3)

2011-06-15 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Lucas Nussbaum said: Well, there are a few reasons why this would be suboptimal: - both qa.debian.org and udd.debian.org websites are managed using SVN, so it's a bit inconvenient to create a playpen as a subdirectory. That's a minor technical issue that can be

Re: UDD access from Alioth(s children) (Was: Alioth status update, take 3)

2011-06-15 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 15/06/11 at 08:36 +0100, Stephen Gran wrote: As a secondary issue, I think it might be useful to let DDs 'scratch their itch' when it comes to QA work in a light weight way. However, I'm not in the QA team, so I can't make decisions about what sort of access the QA team wants to give to

Re: UDD access from Alioth(s children) (Was: Alioth status update, take 3)

2011-06-15 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Lucas Nussbaum said: On 15/06/11 at 08:36 +0100, Stephen Gran wrote: As a secondary issue, I think it might be useful to let DDs 'scratch their itch' when it comes to QA work in a light weight way. However, I'm not in the QA team, so I can't make decisions about

Re: UDD access from Alioth(s children) (Was: Alioth status update, take 3)

2011-06-15 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 15/06/11 at 20:00 +0100, Stephen Gran wrote: This one time, at band camp, Lucas Nussbaum said: On 15/06/11 at 08:36 +0100, Stephen Gran wrote: As a secondary issue, I think it might be useful to let DDs 'scratch their itch' when it comes to QA work in a light weight way. However,

Re: UDD access from Alioth(s children) (Was: Alioth status update, take 3)

2011-06-14 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
Hi! * Stephen Gran sg...@debian.org [2011-06-11 16:06:58 CEST]: This one time, at band camp, Andreas Tille said: I would like to repeat my question about UDD access from alioth (or one / both of its successors): Is there anybody working to reenable the UDD access? This is now

Re: UDD access from Alioth(s children) (Was: Alioth status update, take 3)

2011-06-14 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 14/06/11 at 16:49 +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: tl;drIs there some host for php/cgi and UDD access? Hi, Maybe we need a general-purpose machine accessible by all alioth users, without any performance-critical services, to execute all the random development-supporting scripts that generate web

Re: UDD access from Alioth(s children) (Was: Alioth status update, take 3)

2011-06-14 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Gerfried Fuchs said: Hi! * Stephen Gran sg...@debian.org [2011-06-11 16:06:58 CEST]: This one time, at band camp, Andreas Tille said: I would like to repeat my question about UDD access from alioth (or one / both of its successors): Is there

Re: UDD access from Alioth(s children) (Was: Alioth status update, take 3)

2011-06-14 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 14/06/11 at 21:03 +0100, Stephen Gran wrote: This one time, at band camp, Gerfried Fuchs said: Hi! * Stephen Gran sg...@debian.org [2011-06-11 16:06:58 CEST]: This one time, at band camp, Andreas Tille said: I would like to repeat my question about UDD access from alioth

Re: UDD access from Alioth(s children) (Was: Alioth status update, take 3)

2011-06-11 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Andreas Tille said: Hi again, I would like to repeat my question about UDD access from alioth (or one / both of its successors): Is there anybody working to reenable the UDD access? This is now reenabled. I had hoped to get postgres streaming replication

Re: UDD access from Alioth(s children)

2011-06-01 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen said: Tollef Fog Heen tfh...@err.no writes: ]] Christian PERRIER | Is there a list of these known issues? Sure, it's in the topic of #alioth: http://titanpad.com/yyhfwA9Pyr What is the preferred method for submitting a proposed

Re: UDD access from Alioth(s children)

2011-05-31 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Tollef Fog Heen (tfh...@err.no): ]] Andreas Tille | I would like to repeat my question about UDD access from alioth (or | one / both of its successors): Is there anybody working to reenable | the UDD access? It's on the list of known issues. Repeating questions means less time

Re: UDD access from Alioth(s children)

2011-05-31 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 09:47:52AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: Is there a list of these known issues? It could really help in avoiding to repeat questions, Such a list would be quite helpful, especially if it would mark those items which are solved which prevents us from random checking

Re: UDD access from Alioth(s children)

2011-05-31 Thread Martin Bagge / brother
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2011-05-31 09:47, Christian PERRIER wrote: Quoting Tollef Fog Heen (tfh...@err.no): ]] Andreas Tille | I would like to repeat my question about UDD access from alioth (or | one / both of its successors): Is there anybody working to reenable

Re: UDD access from Alioth(s children)

2011-05-31 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
]] Christian PERRIER | Is there a list of these known issues? Sure, it's in the topic of #alioth: http://titanpad.com/yyhfwA9Pyr -- Tollef Fog Heen UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Re: UDD access from Alioth(s children)

2011-05-31 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org writes: It's on the list of known issues. Repeating questions means less time to fix the issues that remain. Is there a list of these known issues? It could really help in avoiding to repeat questions, indeed (and thanks again for all the good work... I

Re: UDD access from Alioth(s children)

2011-05-31 Thread Stig Sandbeck Mathisen
Tollef Fog Heen tfh...@err.no writes: ]] Christian PERRIER | Is there a list of these known issues? Sure, it's in the topic of #alioth: http://titanpad.com/yyhfwA9Pyr What is the preferred method for submitting a proposed fix? -- Stig Sandbeck Mathisen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

UDD access from Alioth(s children) (Was: Alioth status update, take 3)

2011-05-30 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi again, I would like to repeat my question about UDD access from alioth (or one / both of its successors): Is there anybody working to reenable the UDD access? Kind regards and thanks for maintaining Alioth Andreas. On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 09:25:37AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: It also

Re: UDD access from Alioth(s children)

2011-05-30 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
]] Andreas Tille | I would like to repeat my question about UDD access from alioth (or | one / both of its successors): Is there anybody working to reenable | the UDD access? It's on the list of known issues. Repeating questions means less time to fix the issues that remain. Regards, --