On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 02:00:21PM +0200, Felix Moessbauer wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Felix Moessbauer
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
>
> * Package name: wnpp
> Version : 0
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Felix Moessbauer
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: wnpp
Version : 0.5.19
Upstream Author : Steve Purcell
* URL : https://github.com/purcell/airspeed
* License
On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 10:31:03AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> You have a large set there which covers three of the ones I'd need. Could
> you upload these:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/rvandegrift/aws-c-common
> https://salsa.debian.org/rvandegrift/aws-checksums
>
On 13 January 2022 at 19:18, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
| On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 10:31:03AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > You have a large set there which covers three of the ones I'd need. Could
| > you upload these:
| >
| > https://salsa.debian.org/rvandegrift/aws-c-common
| >
On 31 December 2021 at 07:51, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| On 30 December 2021 at 22:17, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
| | On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 08:10:50AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| | > My (very informal) packaging has always been in the open (but on GitHub).
A
| | > possible first step might
(Dual reply to two emails)
On 30 December 2021 at 23:32, Wookey wrote:
| On 2021-12-26 18:08 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > Does anybody know where we are with respect to the WNPPs / ITPs / ... on the
| > Amazon SDK for C++?
| >
| > I have a package that could take advantage of this
Hi Dirk,
On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 08:10:50AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> My (very informal) packaging has always been in the open (but on GitHub). A
> possible first step might be to review the added files in debian/ and in a
> first pass edit out all references to 'informal' or 'unofficial'
On 2021-12-26 18:08 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> Does anybody know where we are with respect to the WNPPs / ITPs / ... on the
> Amazon SDK for C++?
>
> I have a package that could take advantage of this if it were packaged, and I
> am sure a number of other packages are in a similar
Hi Noah,
On 26 December 2021 at 20:18, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
| On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 06:08:56PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > I have a package that could take advantage of this if it were packaged, and
I
| > am sure a number of other packages are in a similar situation given how
| >
On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 06:08:56PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> I have a package that could take advantage of this if it were packaged, and I
> am sure a number of other packages are in a similar situation given how
> pervasive AWS use is. So does anybody know where this is at?
>
> FWIW I
Does anybody know where we are with respect to the WNPPs / ITPs / ... on the
Amazon SDK for C++?
I have a package that could take advantage of this if it were packaged, and I
am sure a number of other packages are in a similar situation given how
pervasive AWS use is. So does anybody know where
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Henry-Nicolas Tourneur
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
pkg-rust-maintain...@alioth-lists.debian.net
* Package name: gps-share
Version : 0.3.1
Upstream Author : Zeeshan Ali
* URL : https://github.com/zeenix/gps
* Package name: ITP: wnpp -- GNULOCSYS (Linguistic database
management system) for Debian
Version : 1.9.5
Upstream Author : A.D.Klumpp
* URL : https://github.com/AndreasDanielKlumpp/GNULOCSYS
* License : (GPL)
Programming Lang: (C++)
Description
* Package name: wnpp
Version : 1.9.5
Upstream Author : A.D.Klumpp
* URL : https://github.com/AndreasDanielKlumpp/GNULOCSYS
* License : (GPL)
Programming Lang: (C++)
Description : GNULOCSYS (Linguistic database management system) for
Debian
GNULOCSYS
WNPP bug is CCed by the
rejection mail it can be
1. easily found at a convenient place
2. easily referenced for further discussion
3. reviewed by everybody not only DDs (we do not hide
problems, right?)
Since it might be extra work for ftpmaster which I'd like to avoid I
could imagine
On Jul 23, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I was told that DDs can review the rejection mails at
>coccia.debian.org:/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/queue/reject
> but this was somehow hidden knowledge to me and works only for DDs.
Also, not very practical.
I agree that it is a great idea to Cc a
Dear Andreas,
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 12:07 AM Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I think the software that is used by ftpmaster is dak but I think I can
> not really file a bug report about this. So asking here how to put my
> wish into BTS - and may be discussing here whether its a sensible
are
involved. Forcing readers to follow all those links is not very
convenient.
My idea for a solution is that if the according WNPP bug is CCed
by the rejection mail it can be
1. easily found at a convenient place
2. easily referenced for further discussion
3. reviewed by everybody not only
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: wnpp
Version: 1.3.2
Upstream Author: KeePassXC-Browser team
URL: https://github.com/keepassxreboot/keepassxc-browser
License: GPL-3, Expat, OFL-1.1, MPL-2.0
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: wnpp
Version:
Upstream Author: Davis E. King <da...@dlib.net>
URL: http://dlib.net
License: Boost Software License
Description: Dlib is a general purpose cross pl
Package: reportbug
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Neil Williams wrote:
On Sun, 18 May 2014 18:29:39 +0200 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk
* Package name: get
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:42:42PM -0300, Albino B Neto wrote:
Oi
Na lista dev [1] tem um e-mail sobre alguns pacotes. Sendo possível
adotar um pacote [2], acerta seu bug etc.
1 - http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/05/msg00038.html
2 - http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
Então
], acerta seu bug etc.
1 - http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/05/msg00038.html
2 - http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
Então, resolvi verificar o pacote q está órfão (sem mantenedor) [3] e
assim adotar o ARA [4][5]
3 - http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/orphaned_byage
4 - http
Oi
Na lista dev [1] tem um e-mail sobre alguns pacotes. Sendo possível
adotar um pacote [2], acerta seu bug etc.
1 - http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/05/msg00038.html
2 - http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
Então, resolvi verificar o pacote q está órfão (sem mantenedor) [3] e
assim
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 683129 wnpp
Bug #683129 [general] general: Please consider packaging libopencv-nonfree2.4.
Bug reassigned from package 'general' to 'wnpp'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #683129 to the same values
previously set
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tzafrir Cohen tzaf...@debian.org
* Package name: libilbc
Version : 1.1.1
Upstream Author : Jeroen Dekkers jer...@dekkers.ch,
Originally: the WebRTC project: http://webrtc.org
* URL : https://github.com/dekkers
Hi Tzafrir,
the name is a bad idea, as it is already in use:
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/pseudo-packages
Cheers,
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: gmsh-tetgen
Version: 2.5.1~beta2~svn12026
Upstream Author: Christophe Geuzaine cgeuza...@ulg.ac.be,
Jean-Francois Remacle rema
On Dom 18 Mar 2012 11:55:51 Henri Le Foll escribió:
Hello
Hi Henri! Please try the debian-mentors list.
Kinds regards, Lisandro.
--
Una vez que hemos eliminado lo imposible, lo que queda, por improbable que
parezca, es la verdad.
Sherlock Holmes
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Dom 18 Mar 2012 11:55:51 Henri Le Foll escribió:
Hello
OK, maybe I've hitted enter too fast.
I don't know a to maintain a package, and I would be interested to
maintain a package I use every day.
OK, my early reply was mostly to ↑ this.
First I need to learn how to maintain an easy
general section
- UDD could order and find packages by difficulty.
Here are the informations I think could be usefull in the wnpp mail (and
in the PTS when it is not already there)
1. The name of the team the package belongs to.
==
- I hope
2011-03-15 21:24 Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 13:52, Jari Aalto jari.aa...@cante.net wrote:
- does not depend on external programs outside of Debian.
...vast majority of its uses requires downloading things from outside of
Debian, typically with a
On 2011-03-23, Jari Aalto jari.aa...@cante.net wrote:
2011-03-15 21:24 Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 13:52, Jari Aalto jari.aa...@cante.net wrote:
- does not depend on external programs outside of Debian.
...vast majority of its uses requires downloading
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 20:52:05 +0200
Message-ID: 87k4g0fc8a@picasso.cante.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
--text follows this line--
Andreas Barth a...@not.so.argh.org
I agree that starting with the current scripts is for starters. But we
should do it in a way that is
* Jari Aalto (jari.aa...@cante.net) [110315 19:57]:
What is the status of this ITP opened 2010-10-03, 6 months ago? To my
understanding winetricks:
- does not depend on external programs outside of Debian.
- is a single utility that helps quite a bit to install WINE related
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 13:52, Jari Aalto jari.aa...@cante.net wrote:
- is DFSG compliant. The current license is GPL.
Nitpick, but winetricks is LGPL (same as Wine).
- does not depend on external programs outside of Debian.
Winetricks can do some things without external help (change
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
reassign 585385 wnpp
Bug #585385 [general] general: Package GTK+3
Bug reassigned from package 'general' to 'wnpp'.
retitle 585385 RFP: gtk+3.0 -- the GTK+ 3.0 user
was adopted in the WNPP report.
afaik this script is not actively maintained but it's in SVN so you
can give it a go.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
on what
was adopted in the WNPP report.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 513402 wnpp
Bug#513402: general: [needs packaging] fasm
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `wnpp'.
retitle 513402 RFP - fasm
Bug#513402: general: [needs packaging] fasm
Changed Bug title to `RFP - fasm' from `general: [needs
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: libwill-paginate-ruby
Version: 2.3.2
Upstream Author: Mislav Marohnić [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL: http://github.com/mislav/will_paginate/wikis
Hi Patrick,
Patrick Ringl [2008-04-21 3:46 +0200]:
I am concerned about 'cupsddk' which recently passed NEW. On 25th of
march I contacted pkg-cups for joining the team and working on cupsddk
[1] since I am about to repackage 'splix' (a driver for samsung laser
printers).
Martin Pitt did
/msg00043.html
You didn't change the RFP to an ITP and the WNPP is full of people who haven't
issued an ITP and say they will but then never do anything. Policy states
you should change the WNPP bug to ITP, which you didn't, so there has been no
policy violation. But you are free to assist
Hello Martin,
Martin Pitt wrote:
Hi Patrick,
Patrick Ringl [2008-04-21 3:46 +0200]:
I am concerned about 'cupsddk' which recently passed NEW. On 25th of
march I contacted pkg-cups for joining the team and working on cupsddk
[1] since I am about to repackage 'splix' (a driver for samsung
to an ITP and the WNPP is full of people who haven't
issued an ITP and say they will but then never do anything. Policy states
you should change the WNPP bug to ITP, which you didn't, so there has been no
policy violation. But you are free to assist with the package in what ever
way you can. All
Hi Patrick,
Patrick [2008-04-21 17:55 +0200]:
You have not _explicitely refused it - but you didnt add me either.
Oh, that might have been the point of confusion. I am an administrator
for the cupsys package alioth project, but you didn't state that you
wanted to work on cupsys itself (and,
[removing non-related maillists and recipients, this is a purely devel
comment]
Patrick wrote:
Till did never deal with my correspondence so far, which is why I think
he should not maintain it - apart from that I am a CDBS fan, and things
look far cleaner than with his debian/rules.
A bit of
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 10:36:37PM +1000, Mark Purcell wrote:
But you are free to assist with the package in what ever
way you can. All contributions are welcome.
Patrick, as you see you are clearly welcome. So please cool down
and submit patches :)
Perhaps in the longer term we could
but then realized that it
has been uploaded to sid already.
Not just that the uploader/sponsor (probably Mark Purcell) turned a
blind eye to the WNPP and _my_ response that I'll take it *[2]* ... the
package also violates debian policy as far as the copyright file is
concerned (which is a RC
Patrick Ringl wrote:
But - back to the actual topic:
Is this common sense in debian? Not respecting responses to WNPP's and
even ignoring volunteers work? I am gutted!
It is common practice to retitle the RFP (request for packaging) to ITP
(intend to package) and changing the owner of
/wnpp/
Which is linked from http://qa.debian.org/
I think normally debian.net sites are not linked from debian.org addresses,
except from people.d.o or wiki.d.o, so for now I've added a link to
wnpp.debian.net on wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org.
And I'm sending this mail so this can be discussed
Tim Cutts wrote:
Still not free, but the following web site probably helps you do what
you want:
http://wellstyled.com/tools/colorscheme2/index-en.html
Very cool tool. I guess they changed the license,
it reads Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 2.0 now.
Click on its triad button, and it
On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 01:41 +0100, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Tim Cutts wrote:
Still not free, but the following web site probably helps you do what
you want:
http://wellstyled.com/tools/colorscheme2/index-en.html
Very cool tool. I guess they changed the license,
it reads Creative
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 04:35:44AM +0100, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Tim Cutts wrote:
There are a number of programs around which can help with this. I use
Color Oracle: http://colororacle.cartography.ch/
It sits in a Gnome panel, and will temporarily change your entire
display's colours
On 17 Mar 2008, at 3:35 am, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Tim Cutts wrote:
Hm, can you help with creating a good set of colors?
There are a number of programs around which can help with this. I
use Color Oracle: http://colororacle.cartography.ch/
It sits in a Gnome panel, and will temporarily
Hi Tim,
On Monday 17 March 2008 10:45, Tim Cutts wrote:
http://wellstyled.com/tools/colorscheme2/index-en.html
Click on its triad button, and it automatically picks three
contrasting colours which work in all forms of colour blindness
That page/tool rocks! Thanks for sharing! :)
regards,
Tim Cutts wrote:
Hm, can you help with creating a good set of colors?
There are a number of programs around which can help with this. I use
Color Oracle: http://colororacle.cartography.ch/
It sits in a Gnome panel, and will temporarily change your entire
display's colours to simulate
On 13 Mar 2008, at 9:33 pm, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Tim Cutts wrote:
A minor niggle, but the colours you have chosen are not good for
the 5% of your male viewers who have deuteranopia or protanopia,
the two most common forms of colour-blindness. I don't have either
condition myself,
Tim Cutts wrote:
A minor niggle, but the colours you have chosen are not good for the 5%
of your male viewers who have deuteranopia or protanopia, the two most
common forms of colour-blindness. I don't have either condition myself,
but I've been bitten by this before in web pages I've
Sebastian Pipping wrote:
thanks to lucas nussbaum the address
http://debian.binera.de/wnpp/
is now accessible through
http://wnpp.debian.net/ .
I moved the WNPP table page to a host
where I can modify the Apache config.
Therefore
http://wnpp.debian.net/
is no longer a HTTP redirect
Hello folks,
following a short discussion with Erich Schubert on the debtags-devel list[1],
I decided to come with a simple proposal (are DEPs already active and
useful?).
In order to have wnpp bugs better categorized (and, as such, searched, shown,
and managed), it seems a viable option
On Sat, 01 Mar 2008, Luca Brivio wrote:
Any comments? What ‘user’ should we use?
If nothing against comes up, I'm going to use such usertags as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and report (lots of) RFPs (and possibly some ITP!) for
fields I am interested in.
I'd suggest just picking a reasonable subset
subset of the tags
I shall see, didn't even quickly screened for applicable tags, anyway I guess
they will be a subset of debtags + a few wnpp-specific tags. We haven't yet
created a wiki page.
and using the [EMAIL PROTECTED] user so the tags are visible by
default.
I wasn't aware
The colors were introduced for distinction, to speed up hopping from
bug to
bug of a certain type. I decided against coloring the legend because
it
(probably, didn't try) looks ugly and because in my view it was not
important which color ITP is. But that's just my view. I plan to
open up
Hi,
On Monday 28 January 2008 11:03, Holger Levsen wrote:
Could you add an explaination of dust on the page, too? I'm pretty sure
it means age in days, but as there seem to be 23 wnpp-bugs from today, I
checked half of them as I couldnt believe there are so many on a monday
morning already
Hi Sebastian,
On Saturday 26 January 2008 02:13, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
thanks to lucas nussbaum the address
http://debian.binera.de/wnpp/
is now accessible through
http://wnpp.debian.net/ .
Heh, cool, I tried wnpp.debian.net last week and it was not there yet :-)
Could you add
in days, but as there seem to be 23 wnpp-bugs from today, I
checked half of them as I couldnt believe there are so many on a monday
morning already :)
Dust
Number of days without changes
(i.e. amount of dust stacking up on a bug)
Also, what do the different colors mean? Ah, got that. You
Holger Levsen wrote:
It doesnt mean age in days but days since last activity on the bug. The
bugs I checked first, were indeed filed today, but then I saw #456640, which
was filed in December but had activity today, so the dust was 0.
Dust
Number of days without changes
(i.e. amount of
I just finished a RSS 2.0 feed for WNPP. It is located here:
http://debian.binera.de/wnpp/news.php5
The cron job feeding it currently runs every 30 minutes.
Please take that into account when configuring the query
interval. Further details on its usage below...
Configuration:
data
thanks to lucas nussbaum the address
http://debian.binera.de/wnpp/
is now accessible through
http://wnpp.debian.net/ .
sebastian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
,
sebastian
[1] http://debian.binera.de/wnpp/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 21/01/08 at 23:48 +0100, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
i plan to add a feed to [1] in the future.
the current set of questions to answer is
what new/existing bugs became type O/RFA/RFH
== what existing packages need help
what i want to know:
* what would your questions be?
the one
-- rm
i noticed this bug [1] is the only wnpp bug using
the type rm for removal. is this an official
type that scripts talking to BTS should support?
is it documented somewhere? is it a bug in the bug
report?
-- ita
i noticed the intent to adopt tag is not mentioned
on [2] though used frequently
Hi Sebastian,
* Sebastian Pipping [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-01-15 15:58]:
-- rm
i noticed this bug [1] is the only wnpp bug using
the type rm for removal. is this an official
type that scripts talking to BTS should support?
is it documented somewhere? is it a bug in the bug
report?
In general
On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 15:56 +0100, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
-- rm
i noticed this bug [1] is the only wnpp bug using
the type rm for removal. is this an official
type that scripts talking to BTS should support?
is it documented somewhere? is it a bug in the bug
report?
-- ita
i noticed
reassign 453466 ftp.debian.org
thanks
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 03:56:35PM +0100, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
-- rm
i noticed this bug [1] is the only wnpp bug using
the type rm for removal. is this an official
type that scripts talking to BTS should support?
is it documented somewhere
Nico Golde wrote:
i noticed the intent to adopt tag is not mentioned
on [2] though used frequently. is this on purpose?
I guess yes since this part is about adding a new wnpp bug.
And adding a bug with ITA as tag does not make much sense.
It is documented on http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
reassign 458405 wnpp
Bug#458405: general: Include a new software in Debian repository.
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `wnpp'.
retitle 458405 RFP: hermes -- hardware
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: wnpp
Version:
Upstream Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL: http://www.dedalo-3d.com/index.php
License: GPL 3
Description: MakeHuman
Hi,
I tried to take a look at the wnpp bug page but neither Konqueror nor Firefox
were able to handle it on my system. 3182462 bytes for the HTML code of a
single web page is a bit much, isn't it?
So I was just wondering if it is really necessary to show 3500 resolved issues
by default
Hendrik Sattler wrote:
I hope that something can be done about this to make the BTS web pages more
usable.
Are you perhaps not aware of the much smaller indices into the BTS here?
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
Ben
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Hi,
I tried to take a look at the wnpp bug page but neither Konqueror
nor Firefox were able to handle it on my system.
Really? Galeon handles it fine, as does Firefox (the latter on win32).
3182462 bytes for the HTML code of a single web page is a bit much, isn't
it?
Possibly. It's also 25
Am Freitag 04 August 2006 13:49 schrieb Ben Armstrong:
Hendrik Sattler wrote:
I hope that something can be done about this to make the BTS web pages
more usable.
Are you perhaps not aware of the much smaller indices into the BTS here?
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
Indeed, didn't know
Hi,
Am Freitag 04 August 2006 13:39 schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
I tried to take a look at the wnpp bug page but neither Konqueror
nor Firefox were able to handle it on my system.
Really? Galeon handles it fine, as does Firefox (the latter on win32).
Really. Firefox gets very slow
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jose Parrella [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: assp
Version : 1.2.1
Upstream Author : John Hanna [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://assp.sf.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Perl
Description : Anti Spam SMTP
sensitive part of the WNPP chunk. An
automatic retitling for ITAs with an inactivity greater than 250 days
was launched, but it didn't return any bug retitled, which is great
since at least this shows there is some activity on the BTS regarding
these bugs.
You can eliminate most of the noise
On Fri, 2005-09-23 at 17:40 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Fri, 23 Sep 2005, David Moreno Garza wrote:
All of these closings will be done permanently once a day from now on.
Why once a day? Once a week would be more than often enough. Heck, even
once a month is good enough
of bugs
were parsed to check last activity on them, so we could be sure (or
close to sure) the WNPP bug had no activity at all. We did this second
closing on the ITPs and RFPs older than 450 days. The number of bugs
closed was happily reduced (because of checking the time of inactivity)
to 140: 67
On Fri, 23 Sep 2005, David Moreno Garza wrote:
All of these closings will be done permanently once a day from now on.
Why once a day? Once a week would be more than often enough. Heck, even
once a month is good enough :-)
That said, thanks for the nice cleanup work, it is appreciated!
--
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 07:50 +0200, Martin Samuelsson wrote:
Wouldn't it make more sense to close bugs that hasn't recieved more info
in X days than bugs that had their initial post in Y days?
Some packages are trickier than others to create and may therefor take
more time. As long as people
is
that if the people with intention of packaging or requesting a package
to be included is really committed with the wnpp bug, they will kindly
reopen it and will understand why are we doing this.
--
David Moreno Garza [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.damog.net/
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi David!
About ITP's, they should be retitled to RFPs, rather than closed. That
way, other people can have a go at packaging the software.
I concur. If someone did not produce a packge withing NN days (say 3
months) after ITP, the system should
Paul TBBle Hampson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 02:34:51PM +0200, Vedran Furac wrote:
Btw. why then mencoder, can't be packaged? Why are only ffmpeg -dev in
debian: http://packages.qa.debian.org/f/ffmpeg.html?
Only ffmpeg-dev is in Debian as ffmpeg upstream recommends
Hi David!
You wrote:
Talking with adn on IRC, I've decided to launch an script that will
close every opened ITP and RFP bug on the BTS with a lifetime greater
than 600 days by tonight (or if anything goes wrong -I have an exam
tomorrow noon-, by tomorrow night). I'll point to documentation
, if they are not DFSG-compliant (or depend it) they should be
listed here:
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/unable-to-package
- also note that there is software that waits some other software to get in:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=195236
- popular software with status unknown
Vedran Furac [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Moreno Garza wrote:
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 11:02 +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
[...]
- note that there is software that probably can't be packaged:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=203211
Christian Marillat wrote:
Vedran Furac [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Moreno Garza wrote:
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 11:02 +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
[...]
- note that there is software that probably can't be packaged:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=203211
Vedran Furac [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Christian Marillat wrote:
Vedran Furac [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Package already in Debian : gstreamer0.8-ffmpeg
Ops, then it should be closed.
Btw. why then mencoder, can't be packaged? Why are only ffmpeg -dev in
Normaly, encoder can't be
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 02:34:51PM +0200, Vedran Furac wrote:
Btw. why then mencoder, can't be packaged? Why are only ffmpeg -dev in
debian: http://packages.qa.debian.org/f/ffmpeg.html?
Only ffmpeg-dev is in Debian as ffmpeg upstream recommends static linking
due to not having fixed the
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 07:50 +0200, Martin Samuelsson wrote:
Wouldn't it make more sense to close bugs that hasn't recieved more info
in X days than bugs that had their initial post in Y days?
Some packages are trickier than others to create and may therefor take
more time. As long as people
1 - 100 of 272 matches
Mail list logo
