Re: What do you do if a package is built and not uploaded?

2005-10-03 Thread Frank Küster
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2005, Andreas Barth wrote: * Nathanael Nerode ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051001 22:42]: Thiemo Seufer wrote: Mailing {alpha,mips,[EMAIL PROTECTED] is my best guess. There is usually no reply, but from some cases I conclude

Re: What do you do if a package is built and not uploaded?

2005-10-02 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sat, 01 Oct 2005, Andreas Barth wrote: * Nathanael Nerode ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051001 22:42]: Thiemo Seufer wrote: Mailing {alpha,mips,[EMAIL PROTECTED] is my best guess. There is usually no reply, but from some cases I conclude the mailboxes are read. I don't know if those

What do you do if a package is built and not uploaded?

2005-10-01 Thread Nathanael Nerode
I'm thinking of python2.1, which is a key element in some testing transitions. It's out of date on alpha, mips, mipsel, and powerpc -- *yet the buildd logs indicate successful builds on all of them on August 30*. I have already emailed debian-mips@lists.debian.org, and the listed maintainers of

Re: What do you do if a package is built and not uploaded?

2005-10-01 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Nathanael Nerode] I'm thinking of python2.1, which is a key element in some testing transitions. It's out of date on alpha, mips, mipsel, and powerpc -- *yet the buildd logs indicate successful builds on all of them on August 30*. I have already emailed debian-mips@lists.debian.org, and the

Re: What do you do if a package is built and not uploaded?

2005-10-01 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [Nathanael Nerode] I'm thinking of python2.1, which is a key element in some testing transitions. It's out of date on alpha, mips, mipsel, and powerpc -- *yet the buildd logs indicate successful builds on all of them on August 30*. I have already emailed

Re: What do you do if a package is built and not uploaded?

2005-10-01 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Thiemo Seufer wrote: Mailing {alpha,mips,[EMAIL PROTECTED] is my best guess. There is usually no reply, but from some cases I conclude the mailboxes are read. I don't know if those addresses are documented anywhere. They're not. Perhaps they could be? :-) That would be a big help. --

Re: What do you do if a package is built and not uploaded?

2005-10-01 Thread Andreas Barth
* Nathanael Nerode ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051001 22:42]: Thiemo Seufer wrote: Mailing {alpha,mips,[EMAIL PROTECTED] is my best guess. There is usually no reply, but from some cases I conclude the mailboxes are read. I don't know if those addresses are documented anywhere. They're not.

Re: What do you do if a package is built and not uploaded?

2005-10-01 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thiemo Seufer wrote: Mailing {alpha,mips,[EMAIL PROTECTED] is my best guess. There is usually no reply, but from some cases I conclude the mailboxes are read. I don't know if those addresses are documented anywhere. They're not. Perhaps they could