On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 07:26:09PM +0200, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver wrote:
Sure. That's ok. I was more thinking of someone reading the existing
firmware sources, writing a spec and a second person/group implementing
the new free firmware based on the spec. AFAICS the implementors and the
spec
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 12:44:00PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
Peter 'p2' De Schrijver writes:
Or do you think it would be ok if the same people read the existing
non-free sources and reimplement its functionality in a new free
firmware?
As long as they don't copy any protected code you'll
I wrote:
As long as they don't copy any protected code you'll be fine.
Wouter Verhelst writes:
That's the problem, I'm afraid. It's not unlikely that you'll have this
'great idea' which in reality is something you remember from reading the
original source, but not remembering that this is the
On Thu, 07 Apr 2005 01:11:38 +0200, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver wrote:
Hi,
Reading http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/12/msg00078.html I
wondered if people would be willing to work on a free firmware for the
Tigon II chip. I didn't look at the existing code yet, but looking at the
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 01:13:57PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
On Thu, 07 Apr 2005 01:11:38 +0200, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver wrote:
Hi,
Reading http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/12/msg00078.html I
wondered if people would be willing to work on a free firmware for the
Tigon II
On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 19:26:09 +0200, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver wrote:
[...]
Sure. That's ok. I was more thinking of someone reading the existing
firmware sources, writing a spec and a second person/group implementing
the new free firmware based on the spec. AFAICS the implementors and the
spec
Peter 'p2' De Schrijver wrote:
I didn't look at the existing code yet, but looking at the datasheet
(http://alteon.shareable.org/firmware-source/12.4.13/tigonbk.pdf.bz2) it
doesn't seem to be a very complicated chip to code for. I'm not sure
however, how to handle the development in such a way
Peter 'p2' De Schrijver writes:
I was more thinking of someone reading the existing firmware sources,
writing a spec and a second person/group implementing the new free
firmware based on the spec. AFAICS the implementors and the spec writers
should be different people/groups.
You can do that
Hi,
Reading http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/12/msg00078.html I
wondered if people would be willing to work on a free firmware for
the Tigon II chip. I didn't look at the existing code yet, but looking
at the datasheet
9 matches
Mail list logo
